From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Fri, 26 May 2000 22:41:13 +0200 From: Jamie Lokier Subject: Re: [RFC] 2.3/4 VM queues idea Message-ID: <20000526224113.A22069@pcep-jamie.cern.ch> References: <20000525185059.A20563@pcep-jamie.cern.ch> <20000526120805.C10082@redhat.com> <20000526132219.C21510@pcep-jamie.cern.ch> <20000526141526.E10082@redhat.com> <20000526163129.B21662@pcep-jamie.cern.ch> <20000526153821.N10082@redhat.com> <20000526183640.A21731@pcep-jamie.cern.ch> <20000526174018.Q10082@redhat.com> <20000526190208.A21856@pcep-jamie.cern.ch> <20000526181509.R10082@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20000526181509.R10082@redhat.com>; from sct@redhat.com on Fri, May 26, 2000 at 06:15:09PM +0100 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: "Stephen C. Tweedie" Cc: Matthew Dillon , Rik van Riel , linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: Stephen C. Tweedie wrote: > > The stacked private address_spaces I described don't have to be shared > > between address_spaces in a single mm. You can have one per vma -- > > that's simple but maybe wasteful. > > That's basically exactly what davem's stuff did. Ok, I shall look more carefully at davem's code. Is this the most recent one?: > Date: Wed, 17 May 2000 11:00:34 +0100 > Subject: [davem@redhat.com: my paging work] > From: "Stephen C. Tweedie" > > Hi, > > Here's davem's page-based swapout snapshot. It's UNFINISHED + DANGEROUS > WILL_EAT_YOUR_DISK (his words!), but somebody may want to archive this > and pick up on the work in 2.5. > > --Stephen > > ----- Forwarded message from "David S. Miller" ----- -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux.eu.org/Linux-MM/