From: "Stephen C. Tweedie" <sct@redhat.com>
To: "Stephen C. Tweedie" <sct@redhat.com>,
Chaitanya Tumuluri <chait@getafix.engr.sgi.com>,
Eric Youngdale <eric@andante.org>,
Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Douglas Gilbert <dgilbert@interlog.com>,
linux-scsi@vger.rutgers.edu, chait@sgi.com, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: PATCH: Enhance queueing/scsi-midlayer to handle kiobufs. [Re: Request splits]
Date: Fri, 19 May 2000 16:55:02 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20000519165502.G9961@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20000519084842.A3373@skull.piratehaven.org>; from bapper@piratehaven.org on Fri, May 19, 2000 at 08:48:42AM -0700
Hi,
On Fri, May 19, 2000 at 08:48:42AM -0700, Brian Pomerantz wrote:
> > The real solution is probably not to increase the atomic I/O size, but
> > rather to pipeline I/Os. That is planned for the future, and now there
>
> That really depends on the device characteristics. This Ciprico
> hardware I've been working with really only performs well if the
> atomic I/O size is >= 1MB. Once you introduce additional transactions
> across the bus, your performance drops significantly. I guess it is a
> tradeoff between latency and bandwidth. Unless you mean the low level
> device would be handed a vector of kiobufs and it would build a single
> SCSI request with that vector,
ll_rw_block can already do that, but...
> then I suppose it would work well but
> the requests would have to make up a contiguous chunk of drive space.
... a single request _must_, by definition, be contiguous. There is
simply no way for the kernel to deal with non-contiguous atomic I/Os.
I'm not sure what you're talking about here --- how can an atomic I/O
be anything else? We can do scatter-gather, but only from scattered
memory, not to scattered disk blocks.
--Stephen
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux.eu.org/Linux-MM/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-05-19 15:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <00c201bfc0d7$56664db0$4d0310ac@fairfax.datafocus.com>
[not found] ` <200005181955.MAA71492@getafix.engr.sgi.com>
2000-05-19 15:09 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2000-05-19 15:48 ` Brian Pomerantz
2000-05-19 15:55 ` Stephen C. Tweedie [this message]
2000-05-19 16:17 ` Brian Pomerantz
2000-05-19 18:00 ` Chaitanya Tumuluri
2000-05-19 18:11 ` Gérard Roudier
2000-05-19 19:24 ` Brian Pomerantz
2000-05-19 20:43 ` Gérard Roudier
2000-05-20 9:10 ` Change direct I/O memory model? [Was Re: PATCH: Enhance queueing/scsi-midlayer to handle kiobufs] Mark Mokryn
2000-05-19 17:53 ` PATCH: Enhance queueing/scsi-midlayer to handle kiobufs. [Re: Request splits] Chaitanya Tumuluri
2000-05-19 17:38 ` Chaitanya Tumuluri
2000-05-23 21:58 ` Chaitanya Tumuluri
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20000519165502.G9961@redhat.com \
--to=sct@redhat.com \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=chait@getafix.engr.sgi.com \
--cc=chait@sgi.com \
--cc=dgilbert@interlog.com \
--cc=eric@andante.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.rutgers.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox