linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andi Kleen <ak@muc.de>
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Sasi Peter <sape@iq.rulez.org>,
	riel@nl.linux.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.rutgers.edu
Subject: Re: [PATCH] 2.3.99-pre6-7 VM rebalanced
Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2000 17:39:48 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20000430173948.A26377@fred.muc.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E12lvU3-0008Ki-00@the-village.bc.nu>; from Alan Cox on Sun, Apr 30, 2000 at 05:27:51PM +0200

On Sun, Apr 30, 2000 at 05:27:51PM +0200, Alan Cox wrote:
> > The problem with this is that even if the kernel is in .99 pre-release
> > state for several weeks _nothing_ has been changed in it about the RAID
> > stuff still, so a lot of people using 2.2 + raid 0.90 patch (eg. RedHat
> > users) _cannot_ change to and try 2.3.99, because their partitions would
> > not mount.
> > 
> > It seems to me, that if we are talking about widening the testbase for
> > 2.3.99, this is the most important item on Alan's todo list.
> 
> In some ways it probably is. Almost every production site I would feed stuff
> to is using raid 0.90 and some of them are now using ext3 as well. 

Here I have similar problems with reiserfs (a lot of sites use it
already, upto reiserfs root).  So far the 2.3 port cannot read 2.2
file systems.

Andi

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux.eu.org/Linux-MM/

  reply	other threads:[~2000-04-30 15:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2000-04-26 22:03 Rik van Riel
2000-04-30  2:01 ` Sasi Peter
2000-04-30 15:18   ` Alan Cox
2000-04-30 15:39     ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2000-04-30 22:50       ` Hans Reiser

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20000430173948.A26377@fred.muc.de \
    --to=ak@muc.de \
    --cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.rutgers.edu \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=riel@nl.linux.org \
    --cc=sape@iq.rulez.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox