From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2000 23:36:57 +0200 Message-Id: <200004132136.XAA01065@agnes.bagneux.maison> From: JF Martinez In-reply-to: (blah@kvack.org) Subject: Re: A question about pages in stacks References: Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: blah@kvack.org Cc: jfm2@club-internet.fr, linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: > > > Let's imagine that when looking for a pege the kerneml a page who has > > been part of a stack frame but since then the stack has shrunk so it > > is no longer in it. Will the kernel save it to disk or will it > > recognize it as a page who despite what the dirty bit could say is > > in fact free and does not need to be saved? > > It will have to be flushed to swap. Stack shrinkage must be explicitely > performed, preferably using madvise. To this end, they could use a hint > from the kernel about the actual size of the stack (see the stack > discussions that have come up over the past week or two). > > -ben > Will I be flamed if I consider this as a weakness in Linux? While the hardware will notify the kernel only about increasings in the stack segment the fact is a page who is in the stack segment but on the wrong side of the bottom of the stack is in fact a free page a nd does not need to be written to disk. Unless that it is considered that checking for these "false dirty" pages is so slow that it will absorb the benefits got from the reduced number of disk writings. -- Jean Francois Martinez Project Independence: Linux for the Masses http://www.independence.seul.org -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux.eu.org/Linux-MM/