From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: kanoj@google.engr.sgi.com (Kanoj Sarcar) Message-Id: <200003140023.QAA09732@google.engr.sgi.com> Subject: Re: [patch] first bit of vm balancing fixes for 2.3.52-1 Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2000 16:23:10 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: from "Linus Torvalds" at Mar 13, 2000 03:31:42 PM MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Ben LaHaise , linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: > > > On Mon, 13 Mar 2000, Kanoj Sarcar wrote: > > > > I am not sure about the zone lru_cache, since any claims without extensive > > performance testing is meaningless ... but it does look more cleaner > > theoretically. > > It's certainly "different", and LRU list itself will obviously not be as > "least recently used" as a global LRU. However, considering that we're > only using the LRU on a per-zone basis anyway, I think it should give the > same basic behaviour, no? Hmm, true ... I would like Ben to look over the low_on_memory and zone_wake_kswapd setting/clearing part though. Kanoj -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux.eu.org/Linux-MM/