From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.4 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00298C55178 for ; Sun, 1 Nov 2020 05:22:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6931722272 for ; Sun, 1 Nov 2020 05:22:23 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=nvidia.com header.i=@nvidia.com header.b="GDRHpOkp" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 6931722272 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=nvidia.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 2F6B56B0036; Sun, 1 Nov 2020 01:22:21 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 2A6A86B005C; Sun, 1 Nov 2020 01:22:21 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 1597F6B005D; Sun, 1 Nov 2020 01:22:21 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0178.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.178]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D955A6B0036 for ; Sun, 1 Nov 2020 01:22:20 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin25.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay04.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 795681EE6 for ; Sun, 1 Nov 2020 05:22:20 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 77434703640.25.game27_0d0ffad272a4 Received: from filter.hostedemail.com (10.5.16.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.16.251]) by smtpin25.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A1CB1804E3A0 for ; Sun, 1 Nov 2020 05:22:20 +0000 (UTC) X-HE-Tag: game27_0d0ffad272a4 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 4776 Received: from hqnvemgate25.nvidia.com (hqnvemgate25.nvidia.com [216.228.121.64]) by imf15.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Sun, 1 Nov 2020 05:22:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from hqmail.nvidia.com (Not Verified[216.228.121.13]) by hqnvemgate25.nvidia.com (using TLS: TLSv1.2, AES256-SHA) id ; Sat, 31 Oct 2020 22:22:19 -0800 Received: from [10.2.59.55] (10.124.1.5) by HQMAIL107.nvidia.com (172.20.187.13) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Sun, 1 Nov 2020 05:22:12 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 05/15] mm/frame-vector: Use FOLL_LONGTERM To: Daniel Vetter CC: DRI Development , LKML , KVM list , Linux MM , Linux ARM , linux-samsung-soc , "open list:DMA BUFFER SHARING FRAMEWORK" , Daniel Vetter , Jason Gunthorpe , Pawel Osciak , Marek Szyprowski , "Kyungmin Park" , Tomasz Figa , "Mauro Carvalho Chehab" , Andrew Morton , =?UTF-8?B?SsOpcsO0bWUgR2xpc3Nl?= , Jan Kara , Dan Williams References: <20201030100815.2269-1-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> <20201030100815.2269-6-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> <446b2d5b-a1a1-a408-f884-f17a04b72c18@nvidia.com> From: John Hubbard Message-ID: <1f7cf690-35e2-c56f-6d3f-94400633edd2@nvidia.com> Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2020 22:22:11 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.12.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.124.1.5] X-ClientProxiedBy: HQMAIL111.nvidia.com (172.20.187.18) To HQMAIL107.nvidia.com (172.20.187.13) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nvidia.com; s=n1; t=1604208139; bh=BviMObXYl4DBSbzSpkoK8hvibl+1Fsc4El3qoj9SER4=; h=Subject:To:CC:References:From:Message-ID:Date:User-Agent: MIME-Version:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Language: Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Originating-IP:X-ClientProxiedBy; b=GDRHpOkpxs1Ufq2SOGdgYR/E9XR+fbuJ8LSdEQnzZVakY5/3RHLrlV0EUPacqB1hx sgcaxSS6kL92YgOCYxV61/vKgMeyJzWv3pbsiGOiPG2yzztyrS+M509X+WJsspP0iX eGYfmD7CUw9Sc7vfW/dXMJFEk0m7LtD6SNXFGO5vEh2idfKwEVzJ6ZAWx2tcCRv74B z9sCh7r8+3axv5dd8sfK1ThmV84FPNw8fCBM1IYOZ3eSLI6P+VCNYX5tGFWyGGRpnN ra2SHoMsB7AY6QbBfc+xZFCAcf9OI3Wzgrvev7r6iT4kkq15E1JGpS1HdFytcI+8SG 6LGq3w3+17JOQ== X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On 10/31/20 7:45 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Sat, Oct 31, 2020 at 3:55 AM John Hubbard wrote: >> On 10/30/20 3:08 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote: ... >> By removing this check from this location, and changing from >> pin_user_pages_locked() to pin_user_pages_fast(), I *think* we end up >> losing the check entirely. Is that intended? If so it could use a comment >> somewhere to explain why. > > Yeah this wasn't intentional. I think I needed to drop the _locked > version to prep for FOLL_LONGTERM, and figured _fast is always better. > But I didn't realize that _fast doesn't have the vma checks, gup.c got > me a bit confused. Actually, I thought that the change to _fast was a very nice touch, btw. > > I'll remedy this in all the patches where this applies (because a > VM_IO | VM_PFNMAP can point at struct page backed memory, and that > exact use-case is what we want to stop with the unsafe_follow_pfn work > since it wreaks things like cma or security). > > Aside: I do wonder whether the lack for that check isn't a problem. > VM_IO | VM_PFNMAP generally means driver managed, which means the > driver isn't going to consult the page pin count or anything like that > (at least not necessarily) when revoking or moving that memory, since > we're assuming it's totally under driver control. So if pup_fast can > get into such a mapping, we might have a problem. > -Daniel > Yes. I don't know why that check is missing from the _fast path. Probably just an oversight, seeing as how it's in the slow path. Maybe the appropriate response here is to add a separate patch that adds the check. I wonder if I'm overlooking something, but it certainly seems correct to do that. thanks, -- John Hubbard NVIDIA