From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Linux API <linux-api@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-xfs <linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
"linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org" <linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
zhibli@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: reject MAP_SHARED_VALIDATE without new flags
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2018 21:17:55 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1e2ad827-6ff4-4b1e-c4d9-79ca4e432a6c@sandeen.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+55aFzeA7N3evSF2jKHu8JoTQuKDLCMKx7RiPhmym97-8HY7A@mail.gmail.com>
On 6/27/18 9:10 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 6:45 PM Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>> Thus the invalid flag combination of (MAP_SHARED|MAP_PRIVATE) now
>> passes without error, which is a regression.
>
> It's not a regression, it's just new behavior.
>
> "regression" doesn't mean "things changed". It means "something broke".
>
> What broke?
My commit log perhaps was not clear enough.
What broke is that mmap(MAP_SHARED|MAP_PRIVATE) now succeeds without error,
whereas before it rightly returned -EINVAL.
What behavior should a user expect from a successful mmap(MAP_SHARED|MAP_PRIVATE)?
-Eric
> Because if it's some manual page breakage, just fix the manual. That's
> what "new behavior" is all about.
>
> There is nothing that says that "MAP_SHARED_VALIDATE" can't work with
> just the legacy flags.
>
> Because I'd be worried about your patch breaking some actual new user
> of MAP_SHARED_VALIDATE.
>
> Because it's actual *users* of behavior we care about, not some
> test-suite or manual pages.
>
> Linus
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-06-28 2:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-06-28 1:45 Eric Sandeen
2018-06-28 2:10 ` Linus Torvalds
2018-06-28 2:17 ` Eric Sandeen [this message]
2018-06-28 2:37 ` Linus Torvalds
2018-06-28 4:18 ` Eric Sandeen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1e2ad827-6ff4-4b1e-c4d9-79ca4e432a6c@sandeen.net \
--to=sandeen@sandeen.net \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sandeen@redhat.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=zhibli@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox