From: Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@intel.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Alexander Duyck <alexanderduyck@fb.com>,
Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@huawei.com>,
"Jesper Dangaard Brouer" <hawk@kernel.org>,
Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
"Vlastimil Babka" <vbabka@suse.cz>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
<nex.sw.ncis.osdt.itp.upstreaming@intel.com>,
<netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org>,
<linux-mm@kvack.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v9 7/9] libeth: add Rx buffer management
Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2024 11:11:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1dda8fd5-233b-4b26-95cc-f4eb339a7f88@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240405212513.0d189968@kernel.org>
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2024 21:25:13 -0700
> On Thu, 4 Apr 2024 17:44:00 +0200 Alexander Lobakin wrote:
>> +/**
>> + * struct libeth_fq - structure representing a buffer queue
>> + * @fp: hotpath part of the structure
>
> Second time this happens this week, so maybe some tooling change in 6.9
> but apparently kdoc does not want to know about the tagged struct:
>
> include/net/libeth/rx.h:69: warning: Excess struct member 'fp' description in 'libeth_fq'
Oh no, maybe we should teach kdoc to parse struct_group*()?
>
>> + * @pp: &page_pool for buffer management
>> + * @fqes: array of Rx buffers
>> + * @truesize: size to allocate per buffer, w/overhead
>> + * @count: number of descriptors/buffers the queue has
>> + * @buf_len: HW-writeable length per each buffer
>> + * @nid: ID of the closest NUMA node with memory
>> + */
>> +struct libeth_fq {
>> + struct_group_tagged(libeth_fq_fp, fp,
>> + struct page_pool *pp;
>> + struct libeth_fqe *fqes;
>> +
>> + u32 truesize;
>> + u32 count;
>> + );
>> +
>> + /* Cold fields */
>> + u32 buf_len;
>> + int nid;
>> +};
Thanks,
Olek
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-08 9:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-04 15:43 [PATCH net-next v9 0/9] net: intel: start The Great Code Dedup + Page Pool for iavf Alexander Lobakin
2024-04-04 15:43 ` [PATCH net-next v9 1/9] net: intel: introduce {,Intel} Ethernet common library Alexander Lobakin
2024-04-04 15:43 ` [PATCH net-next v9 2/9] iavf: kill "legacy-rx" for good Alexander Lobakin
2024-04-05 10:15 ` Przemek Kitszel
2024-04-04 15:43 ` [PATCH net-next v9 3/9] iavf: drop page splitting and recycling Alexander Lobakin
2024-04-04 15:43 ` [PATCH net-next v9 4/9] slab: introduce kvmalloc_array_node() and kvcalloc_node() Alexander Lobakin
2024-04-05 10:12 ` Przemek Kitszel
2024-04-05 10:44 ` Vlastimil Babka
2024-04-04 15:43 ` [PATCH net-next v9 5/9] page_pool: constify some read-only function arguments Alexander Lobakin
2024-04-04 15:43 ` [PATCH net-next v9 6/9] page_pool: add DMA-sync-for-CPU inline helper Alexander Lobakin
2024-04-04 15:44 ` [PATCH net-next v9 7/9] libeth: add Rx buffer management Alexander Lobakin
2024-04-05 10:32 ` Przemek Kitszel
2024-04-08 9:09 ` Alexander Lobakin
2024-04-09 10:58 ` Przemek Kitszel
2024-04-10 11:49 ` Alexander Lobakin
2024-04-10 13:01 ` Przemek Kitszel
2024-04-10 13:01 ` Alexander Lobakin
2024-04-10 13:12 ` Przemek Kitszel
2024-04-06 4:25 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-04-08 9:11 ` Alexander Lobakin [this message]
2024-04-08 9:45 ` Alexander Lobakin
2024-04-09 16:17 ` Kees Cook
2024-04-10 13:36 ` Alexander Lobakin
2024-04-11 0:54 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-04-11 9:07 ` Alexander Lobakin
2024-04-11 13:45 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-04-04 15:44 ` [PATCH net-next v9 8/9] iavf: pack iavf_ring more efficiently Alexander Lobakin
2024-04-04 15:44 ` [PATCH net-next v9 9/9] iavf: switch to Page Pool Alexander Lobakin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1dda8fd5-233b-4b26-95cc-f4eb339a7f88@intel.com \
--to=aleksander.lobakin@intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alexanderduyck@fb.com \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=hawk@kernel.org \
--cc=ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org \
--cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linyunsheng@huawei.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nex.sw.ncis.osdt.itp.upstreaming@intel.com \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox