From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mm, page_alloc: disallow __GFP_COMP in alloc_pages_exact()
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2019 11:30:03 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1dc997a3-7573-7bd5-9ce6-3bfbf77d1194@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190314101526.GH7473@dhcp22.suse.cz>
On 3/14/19 11:15 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Thu 14-03-19 10:42:49, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
>> alloc_pages_exact*() allocates a page of sufficient order and then splits it
>> to return only the number of pages requested. That makes it incompatible with
>> __GFP_COMP, because compound pages cannot be split.
>>
>> As shown by [1] things may silently work until the requested size (possibly
>> depending on user) stops being power of two. Then for CONFIG_DEBUG_VM, BUG_ON()
>> triggers in split_page(). Without CONFIG_DEBUG_VM, consequences are unclear.
>>
>> There are several options here, none of them great:
>>
>> 1) Don't do the spliting when __GFP_COMP is passed, and return the whole
>> compound page. However if caller then returns it via free_pages_exact(),
>> that will be unexpected and the freeing actions there will be wrong.
>>
>> 2) Warn and remove __GFP_COMP from the flags. But the caller wanted it, so
>> things may break later somewhere.
>>
>> 3) Warn and return NULL. However NULL may be unexpected, especially for
>> small sizes.
>>
>> This patch picks option 3, as it's best defined.
>
> The question is whether callers of alloc_pages_exact do have any
> fallback because if they don't then this is forcing an always fail path
> and I strongly suspect this is not really what users want. I would
> rather go with 2) because "callers wanted it" is much less probable than
> "caller is simply confused and more gfp flags is surely better than
> fewer".
I initially went with 2 as well, as you can see from v1 :) but then I looked at
the commit [2] mentioned in [1] and I think ALSA legitimaly uses __GFP_COMP so
that the pages are then mapped to userspace. Breaking that didn't seem good.
The point is that with the warning in place, A developer will immediately know
that they did something wrong, regardless if the size is power-of-two or not.
But yeah, if it's adding of __GFP_COMP that is not deterministic, a bug can
still sit silently for a while.
But maybe we could go with 1) if free_pages_exact() is also adjusted to check
for CompoundPage and free it properly?
>> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20181126002805.GI18977@shao2-debian/T/#u
[2]
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tiwai/sound.git/commit/?id=3a6d1980fe96dbbfe3ae58db0048867f5319cdbf
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
>> ---
>> Sent v1 before amending commit, sorry.
>>
>> mm/page_alloc.c | 15 ++++++++++++---
>> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
>> index 0b9f577b1a2a..dd3f89e8f88d 100644
>> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
>> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
>> @@ -4752,7 +4752,7 @@ static void *make_alloc_exact(unsigned long addr, unsigned int order,
>> /**
>> * alloc_pages_exact - allocate an exact number physically-contiguous pages.
>> * @size: the number of bytes to allocate
>> - * @gfp_mask: GFP flags for the allocation
>> + * @gfp_mask: GFP flags for the allocation, must not contain __GFP_COMP
>> *
>> * This function is similar to alloc_pages(), except that it allocates the
>> * minimum number of pages to satisfy the request. alloc_pages() can only
>> @@ -4768,6 +4768,10 @@ void *alloc_pages_exact(size_t size, gfp_t gfp_mask)
>> unsigned long addr;
>>
>> addr = __get_free_pages(gfp_mask, order);
>> +
>> + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(gfp_mask & __GFP_COMP))
>> + return NULL;
>> +
>> return make_alloc_exact(addr, order, size);
>> }
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL(alloc_pages_exact);
>> @@ -4777,7 +4781,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(alloc_pages_exact);
>> * pages on a node.
>> * @nid: the preferred node ID where memory should be allocated
>> * @size: the number of bytes to allocate
>> - * @gfp_mask: GFP flags for the allocation
>> + * @gfp_mask: GFP flags for the allocation, must not contain __GFP_COMP
>> *
>> * Like alloc_pages_exact(), but try to allocate on node nid first before falling
>> * back.
>> @@ -4785,7 +4789,12 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(alloc_pages_exact);
>> void * __meminit alloc_pages_exact_nid(int nid, size_t size, gfp_t gfp_mask)
>> {
>> unsigned int order = get_order(size);
>> - struct page *p = alloc_pages_node(nid, gfp_mask, order);
>> + struct page *p;
>> +
>> + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(gfp_mask & __GFP_COMP))
>> + return NULL;
>> +
>> + p = alloc_pages_node(nid, gfp_mask, order);
>> if (!p)
>> return NULL;
>> return make_alloc_exact((unsigned long)page_address(p), order, size);
>> --
>> 2.20.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-03-14 10:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-03-14 9:39 [PATCH] " Vlastimil Babka
2019-03-14 9:42 ` [PATCH v2] " Vlastimil Babka
2019-03-14 10:15 ` Michal Hocko
2019-03-14 10:30 ` Vlastimil Babka [this message]
2019-03-14 11:36 ` Michal Hocko
2019-03-14 11:56 ` Takashi Iwai
2019-03-14 12:09 ` Michal Hocko
2019-03-14 13:15 ` Takashi Iwai
2019-03-14 13:29 ` Michal Hocko
2019-03-14 16:52 ` Takashi Iwai
2019-03-14 17:37 ` Hugh Dickins
2019-03-14 18:00 ` Takashi Iwai
2019-03-14 18:15 ` Hugh Dickins
2019-03-14 20:13 ` Takashi Iwai
2019-03-14 18:51 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2019-03-18 12:21 ` [PATCH v3] " Vlastimil Babka
2019-03-18 12:43 ` Michal Hocko
2019-03-19 8:45 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2019-03-19 9:47 ` Mel Gorman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1dc997a3-7573-7bd5-9ce6-3bfbf77d1194@suse.cz \
--to=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=tiwai@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox