linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Kuehling, Felix" <Felix.Kuehling@amd.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	"Deucher, Alexander" <Alexander.Deucher@amd.com>,
	David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>
Cc: Ralph Campbell <rcampbell@nvidia.com>,
	Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>,
	John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>,
	"linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
	"dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org"
	<dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	"amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org" <amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] mm/hmm: pass mmu_notifier_range to sync_cpu_device_pagetables
Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2019 02:27:22 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1dc82dc8-3e6f-1d6f-b14d-41ae3c1b2709@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190702225911.GA11833@mellanox.com>

On 2019-07-02 6:59 p.m., Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 03, 2019 at 12:49:12AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 02, 2019 at 07:53:23PM +0000, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>>>> I'm sending this out now since we are updating many of the HMM APIs
>>>> and I think it will be useful.
>>> This make so much sense, I'd like to apply this in hmm.git, is there
>>> any objection?
>> As this creates a somewhat hairy conflict for amdgpu, wouldn't it be
>> a better idea to wait a bit and apply it first thing for next merge
>> window?
> My thinking is that AMD GPU already has a monster conflict from this:
>
>   int hmm_range_register(struct hmm_range *range,
> -                      struct mm_struct *mm,
> +                      struct hmm_mirror *mirror,
>                         unsigned long start,
>                         unsigned long end,
>                         unsigned page_shift);
>
> So, depending on how that is resolved we might want to do both API
> changes at once.

I just sent out a fix for the hmm_mirror API change.


>
> Or we may have to revert the above change at this late date.
>
> Waiting for AMDGPU team to discuss what process they want to use.

Yeah, I'm wondering what the process is myself. With HMM and driver 
development happening on different branches these kinds of API changes 
are painful. There seems to be a built-in assumption in the current 
process, that code flows mostly in one direction amd-staging-drm-next -> 
drm-next -> linux-next -> linux. That assumption is broken with HMM code 
evolving rapidly in both amdgpu and mm.

If we want to continue developing HMM driver changes in 
amd-staging-drm-next, we'll need to synchronize with hmm.git more 
frequently, both ways. I believe part of the problem is, that there is a 
fairly long lead-time from getting changes from amd-staging-drm-next 
into linux-next, as they are held for one release cycle in drm-next. 
Pushing HMM-related changes through drm-fixes may offer a kind of 
shortcut. Philip and my latest fixup is just bypassing drm-next 
completely and going straight into linux-next, though.

Regards,
   Felix


>
> Jason

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-07-03  2:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-06-08  0:14 Ralph Campbell
2019-06-08  9:10 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-08 11:41   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-06-10  0:16     ` John Hubbard
2019-06-08 11:50 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-06-09 19:46 ` Ira Weiny
2019-07-02 19:53 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-07-02 20:11   ` Ralph Campbell
2019-07-02 22:49   ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-07-02 22:59     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-07-03  0:03       ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-07-03  2:27       ` Kuehling, Felix [this message]
2019-07-03 15:08         ` Jason Gunthorpe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1dc82dc8-3e6f-1d6f-b14d-41ae3c1b2709@amd.com \
    --to=felix.kuehling@amd.com \
    --cc=Alexander.Deucher@amd.com \
    --cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
    --cc=airlied@linux.ie \
    --cc=amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=jgg@mellanox.com \
    --cc=jglisse@redhat.com \
    --cc=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rcampbell@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox