linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "David Wang" <00107082@163.com>
To: "Vlastimil Babka" <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, surenb@google.com, mhocko@suse.com,
	jackmanb@google.com, hannes@cmpxchg.org, ziy@nvidia.com,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	"Shakeel Butt" <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/codetag: sub in advance when free non-compound high order pages
Date: Mon, 5 May 2025 22:31:01 +0800 (CST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1da43908.3afc.196a0db7dc3.Coremail.00107082@163.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8edbd2be-d495-4bfc-a9f3-6eaae7a66d91@suse.cz>



At 2025-05-05 21:12:55, "Vlastimil Babka" <vbabka@suse.cz> wrote:
>On 5/4/25 08:19, David Wang wrote:
>> When page is non-compound, page[0] could be released by other
>> thread right after put_page_testzero failed in current thread,
>> pgalloc_tag_sub_pages afterwards would manipulate an invalid
>> page for accounting remaining pages:
>> 
>> [timeline]   [thread1]                     [thread2]
>>   |          alloc_page non-compound
>>   V
>>   |                                        get_page, rf counter inc
>>   V
>>   |          in ___free_pages
>>   |          put_page_testzero fails
>>   V
>>   |                                        put_page, page released
>>   V
>>   |          in ___free_pages,
>>   |          pgalloc_tag_sub_pages
>>   |          manipulate an invalid page
>>   V
>>   V
>> 
>> Move the tag page accounting ahead, and only account remaining pages
>> for non-compound pages with non-zero order.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: David Wang <00107082@163.com>
>
>Hmm, I think the problem was introduced by 51ff4d7486f0 ("mm: avoid extra
>mem_alloc_profiling_enabled() checks"). Previously we'd get the tag pointer
>upfront and avoid the page use-after-free.


Oh, you're right. I forgot to check history......


>
>It would likely be nicer to fix it by going back to that approach for
>___free_pages(), while hopefully keeping the optimisations of 51ff4d7486f0
>for the other call sites where it applies?

After checking that commit, I kind of feels the changes in __free_pages are
 the major optimization of the commit....
What about revert that commit and make optimization by condition checks,
similar to what this patch did?
 


David


  reply	other threads:[~2025-05-05 14:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-05-04  6:19 David Wang
2025-05-05 13:12 ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-05-05 14:31   ` David Wang [this message]
2025-05-05 14:55     ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-05-05 15:33       ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2025-05-05 16:42         ` David Wang
2025-05-05 16:53           ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2025-05-05 18:34             ` [PATCH v2] mm/codetag: move tag retrieval back upfront in __free_pages() David Wang
2025-05-05 19:17               ` David Wang
2025-05-05 19:30             ` [PATCH v3] " David Wang
2025-05-05 20:32               ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2025-05-06  7:58               ` Vlastimil Babka

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1da43908.3afc.196a0db7dc3.Coremail.00107082@163.com \
    --to=00107082@163.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=jackmanb@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
    --cc=surenb@google.com \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox