From: "David Wang" <00107082@163.com>
To: "Vlastimil Babka" <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, surenb@google.com, mhocko@suse.com,
jackmanb@google.com, hannes@cmpxchg.org, ziy@nvidia.com,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Shakeel Butt" <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/codetag: sub in advance when free non-compound high order pages
Date: Mon, 5 May 2025 22:31:01 +0800 (CST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1da43908.3afc.196a0db7dc3.Coremail.00107082@163.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8edbd2be-d495-4bfc-a9f3-6eaae7a66d91@suse.cz>
At 2025-05-05 21:12:55, "Vlastimil Babka" <vbabka@suse.cz> wrote:
>On 5/4/25 08:19, David Wang wrote:
>> When page is non-compound, page[0] could be released by other
>> thread right after put_page_testzero failed in current thread,
>> pgalloc_tag_sub_pages afterwards would manipulate an invalid
>> page for accounting remaining pages:
>>
>> [timeline] [thread1] [thread2]
>> | alloc_page non-compound
>> V
>> | get_page, rf counter inc
>> V
>> | in ___free_pages
>> | put_page_testzero fails
>> V
>> | put_page, page released
>> V
>> | in ___free_pages,
>> | pgalloc_tag_sub_pages
>> | manipulate an invalid page
>> V
>> V
>>
>> Move the tag page accounting ahead, and only account remaining pages
>> for non-compound pages with non-zero order.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: David Wang <00107082@163.com>
>
>Hmm, I think the problem was introduced by 51ff4d7486f0 ("mm: avoid extra
>mem_alloc_profiling_enabled() checks"). Previously we'd get the tag pointer
>upfront and avoid the page use-after-free.
Oh, you're right. I forgot to check history......
>
>It would likely be nicer to fix it by going back to that approach for
>___free_pages(), while hopefully keeping the optimisations of 51ff4d7486f0
>for the other call sites where it applies?
After checking that commit, I kind of feels the changes in __free_pages are
the major optimization of the commit....
What about revert that commit and make optimization by condition checks,
similar to what this patch did?
David
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-05 14:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-04 6:19 David Wang
2025-05-05 13:12 ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-05-05 14:31 ` David Wang [this message]
2025-05-05 14:55 ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-05-05 15:33 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2025-05-05 16:42 ` David Wang
2025-05-05 16:53 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2025-05-05 18:34 ` [PATCH v2] mm/codetag: move tag retrieval back upfront in __free_pages() David Wang
2025-05-05 19:17 ` David Wang
2025-05-05 19:30 ` [PATCH v3] " David Wang
2025-05-05 20:32 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2025-05-06 7:58 ` Vlastimil Babka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1da43908.3afc.196a0db7dc3.Coremail.00107082@163.com \
--to=00107082@163.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=jackmanb@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox