From: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>, <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: <nao.horiguchi@gmail.com>, <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mm/memory-failure: fix VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(PagePoisoned(page)) when unpoison memory
Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2024 15:29:08 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1d137347-23c9-36a5-e4f0-97e572ff6097@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <44de3a6c-6761-4ad6-a4dd-b9002a42c437@redhat.com>
On 2024/12/23 18:42, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 23.12.24 03:55, Miaohe Lin wrote:
>> On 2024/12/20 16:50, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>>> On 20.12.24 03:35, Miaohe Lin wrote:
>>>> On 2024/12/19 20:18, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>>>>> On 19.12.24 12:52, Miaohe Lin wrote:
>>>>>> When I did memory failure tests recently, below panic occurs:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> page dumped because: VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(PagePoisoned(page))
>>>>>> kernel BUG at include/linux/page-flags.h:616!
>>>>>> Oops: invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI
>>>>>> CPU: 3 PID: 720 Comm: bash Not tainted 6.10.0-rc1-00195-g148743902568 #40
>>>>>> RIP: 0010:unpoison_memory+0x2f3/0x590
>>>>>> RSP: 0018:ffffa57fc8787d60 EFLAGS: 00000246
>>>>>> RAX: 0000000000000037 RBX: 0000000000000009 RCX: ffff9be25fcdc9c8
>>>>>> RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000027 RDI: ffff9be25fcdc9c0
>>>>>> RBP: 0000000000300000 R08: ffffffffb4956f88 R09: 0000000000009ffb
>>>>>> R10: 0000000000000284 R11: ffffffffb4926fa0 R12: ffffe6b00c000000
>>>>>> R13: ffff9bdb453dfd00 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: fffffffffffffffe
>>>>>> FS: 00007f08f04e4740(0000) GS:ffff9be25fcc0000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
>>>>>> CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
>>>>>> CR2: 0000564787a30410 CR3: 000000010d4e2000 CR4: 00000000000006f0
>>>>>> Call Trace:
>>>>>> <TASK>
>>>>>> unpoison_memory+0x2f3/0x590
>>>>>> simple_attr_write_xsigned.constprop.0.isra.0+0xb3/0x110
>>>>>> debugfs_attr_write+0x42/0x60
>>>>>> full_proxy_write+0x5b/0x80
>>>>>> vfs_write+0xd5/0x540
>>>>>> ksys_write+0x64/0xe0
>>>>>> do_syscall_64+0xb9/0x1d0
>>>>>> entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
>>>>>> RIP: 0033:0x7f08f0314887
>>>>>> RSP: 002b:00007ffece710078 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000001
>>>>>> RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000009 RCX: 00007f08f0314887
>>>>>> RDX: 0000000000000009 RSI: 0000564787a30410 RDI: 0000000000000001
>>>>>> RBP: 0000564787a30410 R08: 000000000000fefe R09: 000000007fffffff
>>>>>> R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000009
>>>>>> R13: 00007f08f041b780 R14: 00007f08f0417600 R15: 00007f08f0416a00
>>>>>> </TASK>
>>>>>> Modules linked in: hwpoison_inject
>>>>>> ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
>>>>>> RIP: 0010:unpoison_memory+0x2f3/0x590
>>>>>> RSP: 0018:ffffa57fc8787d60 EFLAGS: 00000246
>>>>>> RAX: 0000000000000037 RBX: 0000000000000009 RCX: ffff9be25fcdc9c8
>>>>>> RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000027 RDI: ffff9be25fcdc9c0
>>>>>> RBP: 0000000000300000 R08: ffffffffb4956f88 R09: 0000000000009ffb
>>>>>> R10: 0000000000000284 R11: ffffffffb4926fa0 R12: ffffe6b00c000000
>>>>>> R13: ffff9bdb453dfd00 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: fffffffffffffffe
>>>>>> FS: 00007f08f04e4740(0000) GS:ffff9be25fcc0000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
>>>>>> CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
>>>>>> CR2: 0000564787a30410 CR3: 000000010d4e2000 CR4: 00000000000006f0
>>>>>> Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception
>>>>>> Kernel Offset: 0x31c00000 from 0xffffffff81000000 (relocation range: 0xffffffff80000000-0xffffffffbfffffff)
>>>>>> ---[ end Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception ]---
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The root cause is that unpoison_memory() tries to check the PG_HWPoison
>>>>>> flags of an uninitialized page. So VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(PagePoisoned(page)) is
>>>>>> triggered. This can be reproduced by below steps:
>>>>>> 1.Offline memory block:
>>>>>> echo offline > /sys/devices/system/memory/memory12/state
>>>>>> 2.Get offlined memory pfn:
>>>>>> page-types -b n -rlN
>>>>>> 3.Write pfn to unpoison-pfn
>>>>>> echo <pfn> > /sys/kernel/debug/hwpoison/unpoison-pfn
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> v2: Use pfn_to_online_page per David. Thanks.
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> mm/memory-failure.c | 14 +++++++++++---
>>>>>> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> diff --git a/mm/memory-failure.c b/mm/memory-failure.c
>>>>>> index a7b8ccd29b6f..02be0596ce67 100644
>>>>>> --- a/mm/memory-failure.c
>>>>>> +++ b/mm/memory-failure.c
>>>>>> @@ -2556,10 +2556,18 @@ int unpoison_memory(unsigned long pfn)
>>>>>> static DEFINE_RATELIMIT_STATE(unpoison_rs, DEFAULT_RATELIMIT_INTERVAL,
>>>>>> DEFAULT_RATELIMIT_BURST);
>>>>>> - if (!pfn_valid(pfn))
>>>>>> - return -ENXIO;
>>>>>> + p = pfn_to_online_page(pfn);
>>>>>> + if (!p) {
>>>>>> + struct dev_pagemap *pgmap;
>>>>>> - p = pfn_to_page(pfn);
>>>>>> + if (!pfn_valid(pfn))
>>>>>> + return -ENXIO;
>>>>>> + pgmap = get_dev_pagemap(pfn, NULL);
>>>>>> + if (!pgmap)
>>>>>> + return -ENXIO;
>>>>>> + put_dev_pagemap(pgmap);
>>>>>> + p = pfn_to_page(pfn);
>>>>>> + }
>>>>>
>>>>> Hm, I wonder if we can do anything reasonable with ZONE_DEVICE pages here?
>>>>
>>>> All I can see in unpoison_memory() is folio_test_clear_hwpoison() for ZONE_DEVICE pages.
>>>
>>> IIRC, it can only be triggered via debugfs in special kernel configs. So chances are this was never ever actually run against a ZONE_DEVICE page.
>>
>> If ZONE_DEVICE pages are never expected, we can simply filter them out.
>
> Looking into some details, I think we should just ignore ZONE_DEVICE for now, I'm pretty sure that it's not handled correctly.
>
> So I suggest to fail if pfn_to_online_page() == NULL, just like soft_offline_page() would.
I think current code doesn't take ZONE_DEVICE pages into account. So I tend to ignore them too.
But let's wait some time for input from Dan.
Thanks.
.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-12-24 7:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-12-19 11:52 Miaohe Lin
2024-12-19 12:18 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-12-20 2:35 ` Miaohe Lin
2024-12-20 8:50 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-12-23 2:55 ` Miaohe Lin
2024-12-23 10:42 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-12-24 7:29 ` Miaohe Lin [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1d137347-23c9-36a5-e4f0-97e572ff6097@huawei.com \
--to=linmiaohe@huawei.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=nao.horiguchi@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox