From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 023BBC27C79 for ; Thu, 20 Jun 2024 16:52:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 8DA458D00C1; Thu, 20 Jun 2024 12:52:08 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 88A8A8D00AF; Thu, 20 Jun 2024 12:52:08 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 6DD398D00C1; Thu, 20 Jun 2024 12:52:08 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from relay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0012.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.12]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C3028D00AF for ; Thu, 20 Jun 2024 12:52:08 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin05.hostedemail.com (a10.router.float.18 [10.200.18.1]) by unirelay07.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04CB3160403 for ; Thu, 20 Jun 2024 16:52:07 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 82251859536.05.2E3CD7B Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) by imf19.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6F241A0022 for ; Thu, 20 Jun 2024 16:52:05 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: imf19.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=g7UWdsEn; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=redhat.com; spf=pass (imf19.hostedemail.com: domain of david@redhat.com designates 170.10.129.124 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=david@redhat.com ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hostedemail.com; s=arc-20220608; t=1718902315; h=from:from:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:dkim-signature; bh=wmT/TfqWZIcOIEydAuy+1NX1w0tpwKPG8r51Xm9pXoo=; b=NnN5a48tHulTPXqfNeYkXzvu+tgy8yjB6gwPjjIxcdCyGXbhBHdWSEWMXA+KJeMXTi9Imo AeCMVxAGUjCK4J+oWZEnUtu8s/UvDc1Z12viDjPrjmRbtUiRg0F1UmOmb8+1QkYtTnjjCK tGnwsJZNlndLjkAiBFHSKAnmgMIP71w= ARC-Seal: i=1; s=arc-20220608; d=hostedemail.com; t=1718902315; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=z2ZnjgC1MVN4D0mxPigWByVrEU68/azHYQkQ+wjYSukQQZ5avviUVsMU1nyl5V8T+/2FlD htD+1jZqIsw3mzyuIYgcPs3+2jbj9tsQLIJQJ701m5xBoEVfkqNg7Dz6LPBa6q/+7M910r IDA72leEy384BnogLl4yEA3SFAm7+Hk= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; imf19.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=g7UWdsEn; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=redhat.com; spf=pass (imf19.hostedemail.com: domain of david@redhat.com designates 170.10.129.124 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=david@redhat.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1718902324; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:autocrypt:autocrypt; bh=wmT/TfqWZIcOIEydAuy+1NX1w0tpwKPG8r51Xm9pXoo=; b=g7UWdsEnIQCTw73kHR5Mib433D6r3nMLYvXCTzwF9bBe1EVFbj2oxrVHVJXgterau/ZXEs 08LPsIqabfUzVw2KsPD5uqq1HFmsuU/KsYwjDWuyMkmamsEwpeEEL/11npEn4Uu2aLBTvg viLSLz0+2r4tpqWCAcOnFAMbeAgdOcA= Received: from mail-wm1-f69.google.com (mail-wm1-f69.google.com [209.85.128.69]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-349-7pI6EROzPcSHA1Wf5CUe5w-1; Thu, 20 Jun 2024 12:52:02 -0400 X-MC-Unique: 7pI6EROzPcSHA1Wf5CUe5w-1 Received: by mail-wm1-f69.google.com with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-4212e2a3a1bso7658315e9.3 for ; Thu, 20 Jun 2024 09:52:01 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1718902320; x=1719507120; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:organization:autocrypt :content-language:from:references:cc:to:subject:user-agent :mime-version:date:message-id:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=wmT/TfqWZIcOIEydAuy+1NX1w0tpwKPG8r51Xm9pXoo=; b=CKY0wObfXBSSYsXPDlGKuYhiD0wsSsvHxrngfCm/9Y4aqOp40rcqLAxVsrb7uQQSWQ wCyZ0besuXDiwDFLdG1qjnRFUnpGCOcGXkV+4gGp1nsJWkRHx2BynAN3K3Rw70V44+Y6 aR+x4z/a115Oir0N1AePIRjo7iAMxDlr72V1NTa9o4MWkF/rRosv0YLTHNFS/zUms00t HG1M8YynKQcQmjmHYkG/xImrGaL9s8RjmmaPn/Sb4KUFSdJXEfLit6E5oiVa9oWkihBt e6CmC93k9PQ6AvcGpUBECbBN15dkjbYwh/bWPV8+qujGZYXTDbsMf5QhGHErYQEm2ecX N13Q== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCXkPK5vss6A37xGxmA4XZ74fr3goHtfEDo6TelJAzZgBLD68MOQ3Z5bmxDFQFGRj6oViDHrjusMAlAqdviTZ5hOvV8= X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyKMEII4No9sq2dDNHII1t0pmVgTRMkg+MGnyfJ36uDftYQtiUk +1aXRfY15TX7wbIxuO8xmkxqjTlpfkUwRK8Y+vx34uEiFmfTpLM/i62MQxYnG4wjU7TlOd/p099 igZ13LicdfARq2Mkl8ZHVeFFDxsQlZiUcYkdQ7Z8iwD6tepz+ X-Received: by 2002:a7b:cc13:0:b0:424:784c:b13b with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-424784cb209mr34286545e9.13.1718902320395; Thu, 20 Jun 2024 09:52:00 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGkU9eW+awitjJjD5GfqBhhuJt0IBeYp1kZXJAiUgDhww7y86Wx3yzlGriaKMbYnwqURbX5rg== X-Received: by 2002:a7b:cc13:0:b0:424:784c:b13b with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-424784cb209mr34286355e9.13.1718902319937; Thu, 20 Jun 2024 09:51:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPV6:2003:cb:c719:5b00:61af:900f:3aef:3af3? (p200300cbc7195b0061af900f3aef3af3.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [2003:cb:c719:5b00:61af:900f:3aef:3af3]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 5b1f17b1804b1-4247d0b634asm32104925e9.1.2024.06.20.09.51.58 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 20 Jun 2024 09:51:59 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1cdf6a43-9599-4e34-8f70-29ed16295a60@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2024 18:51:58 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/9] support large folio swap-out and swap-in for shmem To: Hugh Dickins Cc: Andrew Morton , Barry Song , Baolin Wang , willy@infradead.org, wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com, chrisl@kernel.org, ying.huang@intel.com, 21cnbao@gmail.com, ryan.roberts@arm.com, shy828301@gmail.com, ziy@nvidia.com, ioworker0@gmail.com, da.gomez@samsung.com, p.raghav@samsung.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20240618130538.ffab3ce1b4e66e3ba095d8cf@linux-foundation.org> <475f0f2c-afc7-4225-809f-93c93f45c830@linux.alibaba.com> <2683b71d-aebd-5527-348c-18c0e021b653@google.com> <25ae21b4-23d5-73ba-2e0a-e642ec4b69a0@google.com> <2a358ff4-4219-4262-9225-d9aab14445f6@redhat.com> From: David Hildenbrand Autocrypt: addr=david@redhat.com; keydata= xsFNBFXLn5EBEAC+zYvAFJxCBY9Tr1xZgcESmxVNI/0ffzE/ZQOiHJl6mGkmA1R7/uUpiCjJ dBrn+lhhOYjjNefFQou6478faXE6o2AhmebqT4KiQoUQFV4R7y1KMEKoSyy8hQaK1umALTdL QZLQMzNE74ap+GDK0wnacPQFpcG1AE9RMq3aeErY5tujekBS32jfC/7AnH7I0v1v1TbbK3Gp XNeiN4QroO+5qaSr0ID2sz5jtBLRb15RMre27E1ImpaIv2Jw8NJgW0k/D1RyKCwaTsgRdwuK Kx/Y91XuSBdz0uOyU/S8kM1+ag0wvsGlpBVxRR/xw/E8M7TEwuCZQArqqTCmkG6HGcXFT0V9 PXFNNgV5jXMQRwU0O/ztJIQqsE5LsUomE//bLwzj9IVsaQpKDqW6TAPjcdBDPLHvriq7kGjt WhVhdl0qEYB8lkBEU7V2Yb+SYhmhpDrti9Fq1EsmhiHSkxJcGREoMK/63r9WLZYI3+4W2rAc UucZa4OT27U5ZISjNg3Ev0rxU5UH2/pT4wJCfxwocmqaRr6UYmrtZmND89X0KigoFD/XSeVv jwBRNjPAubK9/k5NoRrYqztM9W6sJqrH8+UWZ1Idd/DdmogJh0gNC0+N42Za9yBRURfIdKSb B3JfpUqcWwE7vUaYrHG1nw54pLUoPG6sAA7Mehl3nd4pZUALHwARAQABzSREYXZpZCBIaWxk ZW5icmFuZCA8ZGF2aWRAcmVkaGF0LmNvbT7CwZgEEwEIAEICGwMGCwkIBwMCBhUIAgkKCwQW AgMBAh4BAheAAhkBFiEEG9nKrXNcTDpGDfzKTd4Q9wD/g1oFAl8Ox4kFCRKpKXgACgkQTd4Q 9wD/g1oHcA//a6Tj7SBNjFNM1iNhWUo1lxAja0lpSodSnB2g4FCZ4R61SBR4l/psBL73xktp rDHrx4aSpwkRP6Epu6mLvhlfjmkRG4OynJ5HG1gfv7RJJfnUdUM1z5kdS8JBrOhMJS2c/gPf wv1TGRq2XdMPnfY2o0CxRqpcLkx4vBODvJGl2mQyJF/gPepdDfcT8/PY9BJ7FL6Hrq1gnAo4 3Iv9qV0JiT2wmZciNyYQhmA1V6dyTRiQ4YAc31zOo2IM+xisPzeSHgw3ONY/XhYvfZ9r7W1l pNQdc2G+o4Di9NPFHQQhDw3YTRR1opJaTlRDzxYxzU6ZnUUBghxt9cwUWTpfCktkMZiPSDGd KgQBjnweV2jw9UOTxjb4LXqDjmSNkjDdQUOU69jGMUXgihvo4zhYcMX8F5gWdRtMR7DzW/YE BgVcyxNkMIXoY1aYj6npHYiNQesQlqjU6azjbH70/SXKM5tNRplgW8TNprMDuntdvV9wNkFs 9TyM02V5aWxFfI42+aivc4KEw69SE9KXwC7FSf5wXzuTot97N9Phj/Z3+jx443jo2NR34XgF 89cct7wJMjOF7bBefo0fPPZQuIma0Zym71cP61OP/i11ahNye6HGKfxGCOcs5wW9kRQEk8P9 M/k2wt3mt/fCQnuP/mWutNPt95w9wSsUyATLmtNrwccz63XOwU0EVcufkQEQAOfX3n0g0fZz Bgm/S2zF/kxQKCEKP8ID+Vz8sy2GpDvveBq4H2Y34XWsT1zLJdvqPI4af4ZSMxuerWjXbVWb T6d4odQIG0fKx4F8NccDqbgHeZRNajXeeJ3R7gAzvWvQNLz4piHrO/B4tf8svmRBL0ZB5P5A 2uhdwLU3NZuK22zpNn4is87BPWF8HhY0L5fafgDMOqnf4guJVJPYNPhUFzXUbPqOKOkL8ojk CXxkOFHAbjstSK5Ca3fKquY3rdX3DNo+EL7FvAiw1mUtS+5GeYE+RMnDCsVFm/C7kY8c2d0G NWkB9pJM5+mnIoFNxy7YBcldYATVeOHoY4LyaUWNnAvFYWp08dHWfZo9WCiJMuTfgtH9tc75 7QanMVdPt6fDK8UUXIBLQ2TWr/sQKE9xtFuEmoQGlE1l6bGaDnnMLcYu+Asp3kDT0w4zYGsx 5r6XQVRH4+5N6eHZiaeYtFOujp5n+pjBaQK7wUUjDilPQ5QMzIuCL4YjVoylWiBNknvQWBXS lQCWmavOT9sttGQXdPCC5ynI+1ymZC1ORZKANLnRAb0NH/UCzcsstw2TAkFnMEbo9Zu9w7Kv AxBQXWeXhJI9XQssfrf4Gusdqx8nPEpfOqCtbbwJMATbHyqLt7/oz/5deGuwxgb65pWIzufa N7eop7uh+6bezi+rugUI+w6DABEBAAHCwXwEGAEIACYCGwwWIQQb2cqtc1xMOkYN/MpN3hD3 AP+DWgUCXw7HsgUJEqkpoQAKCRBN3hD3AP+DWrrpD/4qS3dyVRxDcDHIlmguXjC1Q5tZTwNB boaBTPHSy/Nksu0eY7x6HfQJ3xajVH32Ms6t1trDQmPx2iP5+7iDsb7OKAb5eOS8h+BEBDeq 3ecsQDv0fFJOA9ag5O3LLNk+3x3q7e0uo06XMaY7UHS341ozXUUI7wC7iKfoUTv03iO9El5f XpNMx/YrIMduZ2+nd9Di7o5+KIwlb2mAB9sTNHdMrXesX8eBL6T9b+MZJk+mZuPxKNVfEQMQ a5SxUEADIPQTPNvBewdeI80yeOCrN+Zzwy/Mrx9EPeu59Y5vSJOx/z6OUImD/GhX7Xvkt3kq Er5KTrJz3++B6SH9pum9PuoE/k+nntJkNMmQpR4MCBaV/J9gIOPGodDKnjdng+mXliF3Ptu6 3oxc2RCyGzTlxyMwuc2U5Q7KtUNTdDe8T0uE+9b8BLMVQDDfJjqY0VVqSUwImzTDLX9S4g/8 kC4HRcclk8hpyhY2jKGluZO0awwTIMgVEzmTyBphDg/Gx7dZU1Xf8HFuE+UZ5UDHDTnwgv7E th6RC9+WrhDNspZ9fJjKWRbveQgUFCpe1sa77LAw+XFrKmBHXp9ZVIe90RMe2tRL06BGiRZr jPrnvUsUUsjRoRNJjKKA/REq+sAnhkNPPZ/NNMjaZ5b8Tovi8C0tmxiCHaQYqj7G2rgnT0kt WNyWQQ== Organization: Red Hat In-Reply-To: X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Server: rspam07 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: A6F241A0022 X-Stat-Signature: 6ymj4ojaxn4qh63jy4o69b7ddyomia7w X-Rspam-User: X-HE-Tag: 1718902325-646767 X-HE-Meta: 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 prQYNRvp WCj1lbyyfp6mCtmB5zXbjJ7WqoJQAGtjfR6NAZCPrjYRiDRjreceFoySdrWe/MXnpn2DW4IiPAAUmQpBcVxXz0NP0zcNc3Alqyy86xyWN5O8Hyw/zciMpRv+F1oPt308TiYnMw6A6Elrqh10ULee7cGsGJ9BYvBdHfnZEzO3Xt+QWitkkAeCwjC3Au+/YOyj6lVACjIZ25KatXNHnCzFM+N8dHiTLlR99SPkUlrufkFrvcqgvUYr2YD9EW5g9LaCdFBLEM7WsBitd4bPUqB6qHBjAuX4VKkuuWZNTCuRhl4Ic2S9TNpZ0WMxUT752m9p6hhDAqKOIWA7mDTSfYnzmYPyjEuPRYw8bJSOTnZNt489ZZX20FT2aewKDyBOIG7EOMtpUmWT4jOVHhkJsot0QWT+fe7M0GLCPMfHtBMyOomXwmnyrz925gAC7yI+kUGMeI7s9jQ7dvUlEnfM= X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On 20.06.24 18:27, Hugh Dickins wrote: > On Thu, 20 Jun 2024, David Hildenbrand wrote: > >>> >>> (I do have doubts about Barry's: the "_new" in folio_add_new_anon_rmap() >>> was all about optimizing a known-exclusive case, so it surprises me >>> to see it being extended to non-exclusive; and I worry over how its >>> atomic_set(&page->_mapcount, 0)s can be safe when non-exclusive (but >>> I've never caught up with David's exclusive changes, I'm out of date). >> >> We discussed that a while ago: if we wouldn't be holding the folio lock in the >> "folio == swapcache" at that point (which we do for both do_swap_page() and >> unuse_pte()) things would already be pretty broken. > > You're thinking of the non-atomic-ness of atomic_set(): I agree that > the folio lock makes that safe (against other adds; but not against > concurrent removes, which could never occur with the old "_new" usage). > > But what I'm worried about is the 0 in atomic_set(&page->_mapcount, 0): > once the folio lock has been dropped, another non-exclusive add could > come in and set _mapcount again to 0 instead of to 1 (mapcount 1 when > it should be 2)? That would mean that we have someone checking folio_test_anon() before doing the folio_add_new*, and *not* performing that check under folio lock such that we can race with another folio_add_new*() call. (or not checking for folio_test_anon() at all, which would be similarly broken) When thinking about this in the past I concluded that such code would be inherently racy and wrong already and the existing VM_WARN_ON_FOLIO() would have revealed that race. Whoever calls folio_add_new*() either (a) just allocated that thing and can be sure that nobody else does something concurrently -- no need for the folio lock; or (b) calls it only when !folio_test_anon(), and synchronizes against any other possible races using the folio lock. swapin code falls into category (b), everything else we have in the tree into category (a). So far my thinking :) > >> >> That's I added a while ago: >> >> if (unlikely(!folio_test_anon(folio))) { >> VM_WARN_ON_FOLIO(!folio_test_locked(folio), folio); >> /* >> * For a PTE-mapped large folio, we only know that the single >> * PTE is exclusive. Further, __folio_set_anon() might not get >> * folio->index right when not given the address of the head >> * page. >> */ >> ... >> >> We should probably move that VM_WARN_ON_FOLIO() to folio_add_new_anon_rmap() >> and document that it's required in the non-exclusive case. >> >>> >>> But even if those are wrong, I'd expect them to tend towards a mapped >>> page becoming unreclaimable, then "Bad page map" when munmapped, >>> not to any of the double-free symptoms I've actually seen.) >> >> What's the first known-good commit? > > I cannot answer that with any certainty: we're on the shifting sands > of next and mm-unstable, and the bug itself is looking rather like > something which gets amplified or masked by other changes - witness > my confident arrival at Barry's series as introducing the badness, > only for a longer run then to contradict that conclusion. > > There was no sign of a problem in a 20-hour run of the same load on > rc3-based next-2024-06-13 (plus my posted fixes); there has been no > sign of this problem on 6.10-rc1, rc2, rc3 (but I've not tried rc4 > itself, mm.git needing the more urgent attention). mm-everything- > 2024-06-15 (minus Chris's mTHP swap) did not show this problem, but > did show filemap_get_folio() hang. mm-everything-2024-06-18 (minus > Baolin's mTHP shmem swap) is where I'm hunting it. Good, as long as we suspect only something very recent is affected. There was this report against rc3 upstream: https://lore.kernel.org/all/CA+G9fYvKmr84WzTArmfaypKM9+=Aw0uXCtuUKHQKFCNMGJyOgQ@mail.gmail.com/ It's only been observed once, and who knows what's happening in that NFS setup. I suspected NUMA hinting code, but I am not sure if that really explains the issue ... -- Cheers, David / dhildenb