Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] mmap: Add clarifying comment to vma_merge() code

[Lorenzo Stoakes <lstoakes@gmail.com>]

On Fri, Sep 29, 2023 at 02:30:41PM -0400, Liam R. Howlett wrote:
> When tracing through the code in vma_merge(), it was not completely
> clear why the error return to a dup_anon_vma() call would not overwrite
> a previous attempt to the same function.  This commit adds a comment
> specifying why it is safe.
>
> Suggested-by: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/CAG48ez3iDwFPR=Ed1BfrNuyUJPMK_=StjxhUsCkL6po1s7bONg@mail.gmail.com/
> Signed-off-by: Liam R. Howlett <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>
> ---
>  mm/mmap.c | 5 +++++
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/mm/mmap.c b/mm/mmap.c
> index f9f0a5fe4db4..9967acbd070f 100644
> --- a/mm/mmap.c
> +++ b/mm/mmap.c
> @@ -943,6 +943,11 @@ struct vm_area_struct *vma_merge(struct vma_iterator *vmi, struct mm_struct *mm,
>  			vma_start_write(curr);
>  			remove = curr;
>  			remove2 = next;
> +			/*
> +			 * Note that the dup_anon_vma below cannot overwrite err
> +			 * since the first caller would do nothing unless next
> +			 * has an anon_vma.
> +			 */
>  			if (!next->anon_vma)
>  				err = dup_anon_vma(prev, curr, &anon_dup);
>  		}
> --
> 2.40.1
>

Nice comment! It causes me to sick up a bit in my mouth that this is a thing,
but it's good to have it documented.

Reviewed-by: Lorenzo Stoakes <lstoakes@gmail.com>