From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>, bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: andrii@kernel.org, memxor@gmail.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
peterz@infradead.org, bigeasy@linutronix.de, rostedt@goodmis.org,
houtao1@huawei.com, hannes@cmpxchg.org, shakeel.butt@linux.dev,
mhocko@suse.com, willy@infradead.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
tj@kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, kernel-team@fb.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 3/6] locking/local_lock: Introduce local_trylock_irqsave()
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2024 11:53:11 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1c760bf1-14a4-42e4-a55b-438a29987aef@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241210023936.46871-4-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>
On 12/10/24 03:39, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> From: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
>
> Similar to local_lock_irqsave() introduce local_trylock_irqsave().
> It uses spin_trylock in PREEMPT_RT and always succeeds when !RT.
Hmm but is that correct to always succeed? If we're in an nmi, we might be
preempting an existing local_(try)lock_irqsave() critical section because
disabling irqs doesn't stop NMI's, right?
> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
> ---
> include/linux/local_lock.h | 9 +++++++++
> include/linux/local_lock_internal.h | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 32 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/local_lock.h b/include/linux/local_lock.h
> index 091dc0b6bdfb..6880c29b8b98 100644
> --- a/include/linux/local_lock.h
> +++ b/include/linux/local_lock.h
> @@ -30,6 +30,15 @@
> #define local_lock_irqsave(lock, flags) \
> __local_lock_irqsave(lock, flags)
>
> +/**
> + * local_trylock_irqsave - Try to acquire a per CPU local lock, save and disable
> + * interrupts. Always succeeds in !PREEMPT_RT.
> + * @lock: The lock variable
> + * @flags: Storage for interrupt flags
> + */
> +#define local_trylock_irqsave(lock, flags) \
> + __local_trylock_irqsave(lock, flags)
> +
> /**
> * local_unlock - Release a per CPU local lock
> * @lock: The lock variable
> diff --git a/include/linux/local_lock_internal.h b/include/linux/local_lock_internal.h
> index 8dd71fbbb6d2..2c0f8a49c2d0 100644
> --- a/include/linux/local_lock_internal.h
> +++ b/include/linux/local_lock_internal.h
> @@ -31,6 +31,13 @@ static inline void local_lock_acquire(local_lock_t *l)
> l->owner = current;
> }
>
> +static inline void local_trylock_acquire(local_lock_t *l)
> +{
> + lock_map_acquire_try(&l->dep_map);
> + DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(l->owner);
> + l->owner = current;
> +}
> +
> static inline void local_lock_release(local_lock_t *l)
> {
> DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(l->owner != current);
> @@ -45,6 +52,7 @@ static inline void local_lock_debug_init(local_lock_t *l)
> #else /* CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC */
> # define LOCAL_LOCK_DEBUG_INIT(lockname)
> static inline void local_lock_acquire(local_lock_t *l) { }
> +static inline void local_trylock_acquire(local_lock_t *l) { }
> static inline void local_lock_release(local_lock_t *l) { }
> static inline void local_lock_debug_init(local_lock_t *l) { }
> #endif /* !CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC */
> @@ -91,6 +99,13 @@ do { \
> local_lock_acquire(this_cpu_ptr(lock)); \
> } while (0)
>
> +#define __local_trylock_irqsave(lock, flags) \
> + ({ \
> + local_irq_save(flags); \
> + local_trylock_acquire(this_cpu_ptr(lock)); \
> + 1; \
> + })
> +
> #define __local_unlock(lock) \
> do { \
> local_lock_release(this_cpu_ptr(lock)); \
> @@ -148,6 +163,14 @@ typedef spinlock_t local_lock_t;
> __local_lock(lock); \
> } while (0)
>
> +#define __local_trylock_irqsave(lock, flags) \
> + ({ \
> + typecheck(unsigned long, flags); \
> + flags = 0; \
> + migrate_disable(); \
> + spin_trylock(this_cpu_ptr((__lock))); \
> + })
> +
> #define __local_unlock(__lock) \
> do { \
> spin_unlock(this_cpu_ptr((__lock))); \
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-12-11 10:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-12-10 2:39 [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/6] bpf, mm: Introduce __GFP_TRYLOCK Alexei Starovoitov
2024-12-10 2:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 1/6] mm, bpf: Introduce __GFP_TRYLOCK for opportunistic page allocation Alexei Starovoitov
2024-12-10 5:31 ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-12-10 9:05 ` Michal Hocko
2024-12-10 20:25 ` Shakeel Butt
2024-12-11 10:08 ` Michal Hocko
2024-12-10 22:06 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-12-11 10:19 ` Michal Hocko
2024-12-12 15:07 ` Sebastian Sewior
2024-12-12 15:21 ` Michal Hocko
2024-12-12 15:35 ` Sebastian Sewior
2024-12-12 15:48 ` Steven Rostedt
2024-12-12 16:00 ` Sebastian Sewior
2024-12-13 17:44 ` Steven Rostedt
2024-12-13 18:44 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-12-13 18:57 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-12-13 20:09 ` Steven Rostedt
2024-12-13 21:00 ` Steven Rostedt
2024-12-13 22:02 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-12-12 21:57 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-12-10 21:42 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-12-10 9:01 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-12-10 21:53 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-12-11 8:38 ` Vlastimil Babka
2024-12-12 2:14 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-12-12 8:54 ` Vlastimil Babka
2024-12-10 18:39 ` Vlastimil Babka
2024-12-10 22:42 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-12-11 8:48 ` Vlastimil Babka
2024-12-10 2:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 2/6] mm, bpf: Introduce free_pages_nolock() Alexei Starovoitov
2024-12-10 8:35 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-12-10 22:49 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-12-12 14:44 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-12-12 19:57 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-12-11 10:11 ` Vlastimil Babka
2024-12-12 1:43 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-12-10 2:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 3/6] locking/local_lock: Introduce local_trylock_irqsave() Alexei Starovoitov
2024-12-11 10:53 ` Vlastimil Babka [this message]
2024-12-11 11:55 ` Vlastimil Babka
2024-12-12 2:49 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-12-12 9:15 ` Vlastimil Babka
2024-12-13 14:02 ` Vlastimil Babka
2024-12-12 15:15 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-12-12 19:59 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-12-10 2:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 4/6] memcg: Add __GFP_TRYLOCK support Alexei Starovoitov
2024-12-11 23:47 ` kernel test robot
2024-12-10 2:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 5/6] mm, bpf: Use __GFP_ACCOUNT in try_alloc_pages() Alexei Starovoitov
2024-12-11 12:05 ` Vlastimil Babka
2024-12-12 2:54 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-12-10 2:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 6/6] bpf: Use try_alloc_pages() to allocate pages for bpf needs Alexei Starovoitov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1c760bf1-14a4-42e4-a55b-438a29987aef@suse.cz \
--to=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=houtao1@huawei.com \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=memxor@gmail.com \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox