From: Gabriele Monaco <gmonaco@redhat.com>
To: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.org>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 2/3] sched: Move task_mm_cid_work to mm work_struct
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2025 15:46:30 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1c161066bcbc916ae9d97e7d1753ee12511da085.camel@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250227153329.672079-3-gmonaco@redhat.com>
On Thu, 2025-02-27 at 16:33 +0100, Gabriele Monaco wrote:
> Currently, the task_mm_cid_work function is called in a task work
> triggered by a scheduler tick to frequently compact the mm_cids of
> each
> process. This can delay the execution of the corresponding thread for
> the entire duration of the function, negatively affecting the
> response
> in case of real time tasks. In practice, we observe task_mm_cid_work
> increasing the latency of 30-35us on a 128 cores system, this order
> of
> magnitude is meaningful under PREEMPT_RT.
>
> Run the task_mm_cid_work in a new work_struct connected to the
> mm_struct rather than in the task context before returning to
> userspace.
>
> This work_struct is initialised with the mm and disabled before
> freeing
> it. The queuing of the work happens while returning to userspace in
> __rseq_handle_notify_resume, maintaining the checks to avoid running
> more frequently than MM_CID_SCAN_DELAY.
> To make sure this happens predictably also on long running tasks, we
> trigger a call to __rseq_handle_notify_resume also from the scheduler
> tick if the runtime exceeded a 100ms threshold.
> [...]
>
> Fixes: 223baf9d17f2 ("sched: Fix performance regression introduced by
> mm_cid")
> Signed-off-by: Gabriele Monaco <gmonaco@redhat.com>
Is this patch missing anything?
I refactored a bit to have it build in configurations without RSEQ
and/or MM_CID (which was failing v10)
Thanks,
Gabriele
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-10 14:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20250227153329.672079-1-gmonaco@redhat.com>
2025-02-27 15:33 ` Gabriele Monaco
2025-03-10 14:46 ` Gabriele Monaco [this message]
2025-03-10 15:50 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2025-03-10 15:57 ` Gabriele Monaco
2025-03-10 15:49 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1c161066bcbc916ae9d97e7d1753ee12511da085.camel@redhat.com \
--to=gmonaco@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.org \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox