From: Chunsheng Luo <luochunsheng@ustc.edu>
To: Gregory Price <gregory.price@memverge.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mempolicy: check home_node is in the nodes of policy
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2024 10:29:53 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1bd6caec-f799-48df-8523-22ea0013beb4@ustc.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZbfAUEx0+2d76KWz@memverge.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2132 bytes --]
On 2024/1/29 23:12, Gregory Price wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 26, 2024 at 08:22:40AM -0500, Chunsheng Luo wrote:
>> set_mempolicy_home_node should be used after setting the memory
>> policy. If the home_node isn't in the nodes of policy, we should
>> return failure to avoid misunderstanding.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Chunsheng Luo<luochunsheng@ustc.edu>
>> ---
>> mm/mempolicy.c | 6 ++++++
>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>>
> Since it's not possible to add/remove a node to a mask without also
> erasing the home node, this seems reasonable.
>
> e.g. this is what happens presently
> mbind(0-2) : mask(0,1,2), home_node(NUMA_NO_NODE)
> home_node(3) : mask(0,1,2), home_node(3)
> mbind(0-3) : mask(0,1,2,3), home_node(NUMA_NO_NODE)
>
> However, it is possible for a cgroup migration or a change to
> cpusets.mems_allowed to change a nodemask without somping the home_node.
>
> e.g.:
> mbind(2-3) : mask(2-3), home_node(NUMA_NO_NODE)
> home_node(3) : mask(2-3), home_node(3)
> cpusets(0-1) : mask(0-1), home_node(3)
>
> Should the rebind code also shift the home-node or un-set it accordingly
> to keep the mask/home_node behavior consistent with the syscalls?
>
> (see mpol_rebind_nodemask)
Thank you for your reply.
First, home_node can only be set for VMA policy.
second, the result of cgroup migration is consistent with the result of the first e.g.
when process mem_allowed updates, vma policy will alse be updated.
Function call:
update_tasks_nodemask
->mpol_rebind_mm
-> for_each_vma: mpol_rebind_policy
-> mpol_rebind_nodemask
>
>> diff --git a/mm/mempolicy.c b/mm/mempolicy.c
>> index 10a590ee1c89..9282be2ae18e 100644
>> --- a/mm/mempolicy.c
>> +++ b/mm/mempolicy.c
>> @@ -1536,6 +1536,12 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE4(set_mempolicy_home_node, unsigned long, start, unsigned long, le
>> err = -EOPNOTSUPP;
>> break;
>> }
>> +
>> + if (!node_isset(home_node, old->nodes)) {
>> + err = -EINVAL;
>> + break;
>> + }
>> +
>> new = mpol_dup(old);
>> if (IS_ERR(new)) {
>> err = PTR_ERR(new);
>> --
>> 2.43.0
>>
>>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 3004 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-30 2:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-26 13:22 Chunsheng Luo
2024-01-28 8:29 ` Andrew Morton
2024-01-29 6:15 ` ustc
2024-01-29 15:12 ` Gregory Price
2024-01-30 2:29 ` Chunsheng Luo [this message]
2024-01-30 4:02 ` Chunsheng Luo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1bd6caec-f799-48df-8523-22ea0013beb4@ustc.edu \
--to=luochunsheng@ustc.edu \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=gregory.price@memverge.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox