From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59426C433E0 for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2021 23:13:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB6E4227BF for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2021 23:13:31 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org CB6E4227BF Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 5143B8D005B; Mon, 25 Jan 2021 18:13:31 -0500 (EST) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 4C51B8D0059; Mon, 25 Jan 2021 18:13:31 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 402988D005B; Mon, 25 Jan 2021 18:13:31 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0117.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.117]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D55D8D0059 for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2021 18:13:31 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtpin24.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay01.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E49F1180AD804 for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2021 23:13:30 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 77745850980.24.party90_291242827589 Received: from filter.hostedemail.com (10.5.16.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.16.251]) by smtpin24.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB2BC1A4A5 for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2021 23:13:30 +0000 (UTC) X-HE-Tag: party90_291242827589 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 3195 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [63.128.21.124]) by imf18.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2021 23:13:30 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1611616410; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Q73pb59lnjywOM942tBV2OcvzhYq24ztCSrUSq0hjQs=; b=DuanvDzShyI52NlcNPfO2bM4h9iPNOYdBXt3U2m8OjtsnUQTR/+G30EUy58G6pHZ2iKSm1 lLSoPWsJadpSMjRcqJ3+mVorFUTku4bi3frh/uhb+s2EX1LD+fEBAmB6TEoLGXqk0mBNqe aXgzfefoN1xM4Sj+sCopvMxVpNtvhOE= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-318-KbqhHvVZORSmwIKRNBSxMQ-1; Mon, 25 Jan 2021 18:13:26 -0500 X-MC-Unique: KbqhHvVZORSmwIKRNBSxMQ-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx06.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 547DE190B2A3; Mon, 25 Jan 2021 23:13:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from llong.remote.csb (ovpn-117-163.rdu2.redhat.com [10.10.117.163]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53D055F9B7; Mon, 25 Jan 2021 23:13:22 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/filemap: Adding missing mem_cgroup_uncharge() to __add_to_page_cache_locked() To: Andrew Morton Cc: Miaohe Lin , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Johannes Weiner , Alex Shi References: <20210125042441.20030-1-longman@redhat.com> <3b3f2b56-e66a-db5e-8d8e-95f3812c6838@huawei.com> <4367cc87-1ebf-6df2-d2d4-939c548ca790@redhat.com> <20210125151111.0da207db337a575e5346bd08@linux-foundation.org> From: Waiman Long Organization: Red Hat Message-ID: <1b643acd-920a-665e-5ebe-e7413be381da@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2021 18:13:22 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20210125151111.0da207db337a575e5346bd08@linux-foundation.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.16 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On 1/25/21 6:11 PM, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Mon, 25 Jan 2021 09:12:56 -0500 Waiman Long wrote: > >> Yes, this patch should go to stable. I think the stable tree maintainers >> will automatically pick up patches with the "Fixes" tag. That is why I >> don't explicitly put a "cc:stable" line in the patch. > No. Both the Fixes: and the cc:stable are needed for the backport. > Because sometimes we fix things but don't consider the fix important > enough to risk the backport. > I see. Thanks for the clarification. I will keep that in mind next time. Cheers, Longman