From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
To: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzju@redhat.com>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] mm/page_alloc: Remove unnecessary page == NULL check in rmqueue
Date: Thu, 19 May 2022 14:26:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1b478a71-7de1-2097-7006-634d51f3fda1@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220519121341.GV3441@techsingularity.net>
On 5/19/22 14:13, Mel Gorman wrote:
> On Thu, May 19, 2022 at 12:57:01PM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
>> On 5/12/22 10:50, Mel Gorman wrote:
>>> The VM_BUG_ON check for a valid page can be avoided with a simple
>>> change in the flow. The ZONE_BOOSTED_WATERMARK is unlikely in general
>>> and even more unlikely if the page allocation failed so mark the
>>> branch unlikely.
>>
>> Hm, so that makes a DEBUG_VM config avoid the check. On the other hand,
>> it puts it on the path returning from rmqueue_pcplist() for all configs,
>> and that should be the fast path. So unless things further change in the
>> following patches, it doesn't seem that useful?
>>
>
> You're right -- the fast path ends up with both a if
> (page) and if (!page) checks. Andrew, can you drop the patch
> mm-page_alloc-remove-unnecessary-page-==-null-check-in-rmqueue.patch from
> your tree please?
>
> Originally the flow was important when I was writing the patch and later
> became unnecessary. However, it reminded me of another problem I thought
> of when writing this and then forgotten to note it in the changelog. If
> the page allocation fails then ZONE_BOOSTED_WATERMARK should still be
> tested and cleared before waking kswapd. It could happen if an allocation
> attempt tried to fallback to another migratetype and still fail to find
> a suitable page. This is true whether going through the PCP lists or not.
>
> So what do you think of me adding this patch to a follow-up series?
LGTM.
>
> --8<--
> mm/page_alloc: Remove mistaken page == NULL check in rmqueue
>
> If a page allocation fails, the ZONE_BOOSTER_WATERMARK should be tested,
> cleared and kswapd woken whether the allocation attempt was via the PCP
> or directly via the buddy list.
>
> Remove the page == NULL so the ZONE_BOOSTED_WATERMARK bit is checked
> unconditionally. As it is unlikely that ZONE_BOOSTED_WATERMARK is set,
> mark the branch accordingly.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
> ---
> mm/page_alloc.c | 4 +---
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
> index 1c4c54503a5d..61d5bc2efffe 100644
> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> @@ -3765,12 +3765,10 @@ struct page *rmqueue(struct zone *preferred_zone,
>
> page = rmqueue_buddy(preferred_zone, zone, order, alloc_flags,
> migratetype);
> - if (unlikely(!page))
> - return NULL;
>
> out:
> /* Separate test+clear to avoid unnecessary atomics */
> - if (test_bit(ZONE_BOOSTED_WATERMARK, &zone->flags)) {
> + if (unlikely(test_bit(ZONE_BOOSTED_WATERMARK, &zone->flags))) {
> clear_bit(ZONE_BOOSTED_WATERMARK, &zone->flags);
> wakeup_kswapd(zone, 0, 0, zone_idx(zone));
> }
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-05-19 12:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-05-12 8:50 [PATCH 0/6] Drain remote per-cpu directly v3 Mel Gorman
2022-05-12 8:50 ` [PATCH 1/6] mm/page_alloc: Add page->buddy_list and page->pcp_list Mel Gorman
2022-05-13 11:59 ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2022-05-19 9:36 ` Vlastimil Babka
2022-05-12 8:50 ` [PATCH 2/6] mm/page_alloc: Use only one PCP list for THP-sized allocations Mel Gorman
2022-05-19 9:45 ` Vlastimil Babka
2022-05-12 8:50 ` [PATCH 3/6] mm/page_alloc: Split out buddy removal code from rmqueue into separate helper Mel Gorman
2022-05-13 12:01 ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2022-05-19 9:52 ` Vlastimil Babka
2022-05-23 16:09 ` Qais Yousef
2022-05-24 11:55 ` Mel Gorman
2022-05-25 11:23 ` Qais Yousef
2022-05-12 8:50 ` [PATCH 4/6] mm/page_alloc: Remove unnecessary page == NULL check in rmqueue Mel Gorman
2022-05-13 12:03 ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2022-05-19 10:57 ` Vlastimil Babka
2022-05-19 12:13 ` Mel Gorman
2022-05-19 12:26 ` Vlastimil Babka [this message]
2022-05-12 8:50 ` [PATCH 5/6] mm/page_alloc: Protect PCP lists with a spinlock Mel Gorman
2022-05-13 12:22 ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2022-05-12 8:50 ` [PATCH 6/6] mm/page_alloc: Remotely drain per-cpu lists Mel Gorman
2022-05-12 19:37 ` Andrew Morton
2022-05-13 15:04 ` Mel Gorman
2022-05-13 15:19 ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2022-05-13 18:23 ` Mel Gorman
2022-05-17 12:57 ` Mel Gorman
2022-05-12 19:43 ` [PATCH 0/6] Drain remote per-cpu directly v3 Andrew Morton
2022-05-13 14:23 ` Mel Gorman
2022-05-13 19:38 ` Andrew Morton
2022-05-16 10:53 ` Mel Gorman
2022-05-13 12:24 ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2022-05-17 23:35 ` Qian Cai
2022-05-18 12:51 ` Mel Gorman
2022-05-18 16:27 ` Qian Cai
2022-05-18 17:15 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-05-19 13:29 ` Qian Cai
2022-05-19 19:15 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-05-19 21:05 ` Qian Cai
2022-05-19 21:29 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-05-18 17:26 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2022-05-18 17:44 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2022-05-18 18:01 ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2022-05-26 17:19 ` Qian Cai
2022-05-27 8:39 ` Mel Gorman
2022-05-27 12:58 ` Qian Cai
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2022-05-09 13:07 [RFC PATCH 0/6] Drain remote per-cpu directly v2 Mel Gorman
2022-05-09 13:08 ` [PATCH 4/6] mm/page_alloc: Remove unnecessary page == NULL check in rmqueue Mel Gorman
2022-04-20 9:59 [RFC PATCH 0/6] Drain remote per-cpu directly Mel Gorman
2022-04-20 9:59 ` [PATCH 4/6] mm/page_alloc: Remove unnecessary page == NULL check in rmqueue Mel Gorman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1b478a71-7de1-2097-7006-634d51f3fda1@suse.cz \
--to=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=nsaenzju@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox