* [PATCH] mm/damon: support freeze kdamond
@ 2026-04-08 8:06 Lin Ruifeng
2026-04-08 14:07 ` SeongJae Park
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Lin Ruifeng @ 2026-04-08 8:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: sj, akpm, chenjun102, tongtiangen; +Cc: damon, linux-mm, linux-kernel
During suspend and resume, the data monitored by kdamond is
no longer meaningful. Meanwhile, since kdamond may involve
I/O operations, it is necessary to freeze it.
Signed-off-by: Lin Ruifeng <linruifeng4@huawei.com>
---
mm/damon/core.c | 4 ++++
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/mm/damon/core.c b/mm/damon/core.c
index 3e1890d64d06..5cd1f0aed66b 100644
--- a/mm/damon/core.c
+++ b/mm/damon/core.c
@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
#include <linux/slab.h>
#include <linux/string.h>
#include <linux/string_choices.h>
+#include <linux/freezer.h>
#define CREATE_TRACE_POINTS
#include <trace/events/damon.h>
@@ -2753,6 +2754,7 @@ static int kdamond_fn(void *data)
complete(&ctx->kdamond_started);
kdamond_init_ctx(ctx);
+ set_freezable();
if (ctx->ops.init)
ctx->ops.init(ctx);
@@ -2774,6 +2776,8 @@ static int kdamond_fn(void *data)
unsigned long next_ops_update_sis = ctx->next_ops_update_sis;
unsigned long sample_interval = ctx->attrs.sample_interval;
+ try_to_freeze();
+
if (kdamond_wait_activation(ctx))
break;
--
2.43.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] mm/damon: support freeze kdamond
2026-04-08 8:06 [PATCH] mm/damon: support freeze kdamond Lin Ruifeng
@ 2026-04-08 14:07 ` SeongJae Park
2026-04-09 7:00 ` linruifeng (A)
2026-04-09 7:20 ` linruifeng (A)
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: SeongJae Park @ 2026-04-08 14:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Lin Ruifeng
Cc: SeongJae Park, akpm, chenjun102, tongtiangen, damon, linux-mm,
linux-kernel
Hello Lin,
Thank you for sharing this patch.
On Wed, 8 Apr 2026 16:06:52 +0800 Lin Ruifeng <linruifeng4@huawei.com> wrote:
> During suspend and resume, the data monitored by kdamond is
> no longer meaningful. Meanwhile, since kdamond may involve
> I/O operations, it is necessary to freeze it.
I'm not used to PM freezer, and maybe because of that, I'm not fully
understanding the motivation of this patch. Could you please elaborate the
existing problem and how this patch is fixing or improving it?
Thanks,
SJ
>
> Signed-off-by: Lin Ruifeng <linruifeng4@huawei.com>
> ---
> mm/damon/core.c | 4 ++++
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/mm/damon/core.c b/mm/damon/core.c
> index 3e1890d64d06..5cd1f0aed66b 100644
> --- a/mm/damon/core.c
> +++ b/mm/damon/core.c
> @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
> #include <linux/slab.h>
> #include <linux/string.h>
> #include <linux/string_choices.h>
> +#include <linux/freezer.h>
>
> #define CREATE_TRACE_POINTS
> #include <trace/events/damon.h>
> @@ -2753,6 +2754,7 @@ static int kdamond_fn(void *data)
>
> complete(&ctx->kdamond_started);
> kdamond_init_ctx(ctx);
> + set_freezable();
>
> if (ctx->ops.init)
> ctx->ops.init(ctx);
> @@ -2774,6 +2776,8 @@ static int kdamond_fn(void *data)
> unsigned long next_ops_update_sis = ctx->next_ops_update_sis;
> unsigned long sample_interval = ctx->attrs.sample_interval;
>
> + try_to_freeze();
> +
> if (kdamond_wait_activation(ctx))
> break;
>
> --
> 2.43.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] mm/damon: support freeze kdamond
2026-04-08 14:07 ` SeongJae Park
@ 2026-04-09 7:00 ` linruifeng (A)
2026-04-09 7:20 ` linruifeng (A)
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: linruifeng (A) @ 2026-04-09 7:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: SeongJae Park
Cc: akpm, chenjun102, tongtiangen, damon, linux-mm, linux-kernel
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3749 bytes --]
Hello SJ,
Thank you for your reply. Based on my current knowledge, I think this can be
described from three aspects:
1、kdamond monitors physical/virtual addresses and performs certain actions based
on the monitoring results to improve system/process efficiency. When the system
undergoes suspend/resume, most user-space processes are in a suspended state.
kdamond may therefore perform operations such as PAGEOUT / MADV_NOHUGEPAGE, but
these are not true data monitoring results. This may cause changes in the efficiency
of certain processes after system resume. Therefore, I believe that continuing to
run kdamond during suspend is meaningless and may even have negative effects.
2、When performing hibernate, most of the used memory in the system is swapped out to
disk. When memory is large, this is time-consuming. If kdamond does not sleep, it may
affect hibernate efficiency.
3、As discussed in [1]: "The principal reason is to prevent filesystems from being damaged
after hibernation. At the moment we have no simple means of checkpointing filesystems, so if
there are any modifications made to filesystem data and/or metadata on disks, we cannot bring
them back to the state from before the modifications. At the same time each hibernation image
contains some filesystem-related information that must be consistent with the state of the on
disk data and metadata after the system memory state has been restored from the image (otherwise
the filesystems will be damaged in a nasty way, usually making them almost impossible to repair).
We therefore freeze tasks that might cause the on-disk filesystems' data and metadata to be modified
after the hibernation image has been created and before the system is finally powered off. The majority
of these are user space processes, but if any of the kernel threads may cause something like this to
happen, they have to be freezable." During suspend/resume, processes involving I/O operations should
be frozen.
Based on the above reasons, I believe it is reasonable to support freezing kdamond. If there are any
errors in my thinking, please point them out.
Thans,
Lin Ruifeng
在 2026/4/8 22:07, SeongJae Park 写道:
> Hello Lin,
>
>
> Thank you for sharing this patch.
>
> On Wed, 8 Apr 2026 16:06:52 +0800 Lin Ruifeng<linruifeng4@huawei.com> wrote:
>
>> During suspend and resume, the data monitored by kdamond is
>> no longer meaningful. Meanwhile, since kdamond may involve
>> I/O operations, it is necessary to freeze it.
> I'm not used to PM freezer, and maybe because of that, I'm not fully
> understanding the motivation of this patch. Could you please elaborate the
> existing problem and how this patch is fixing or improving it?
>
>
> Thanks,
> SJ
>
>> Signed-off-by: Lin Ruifeng<linruifeng4@huawei.com>
>> ---
>> mm/damon/core.c | 4 ++++
>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/mm/damon/core.c b/mm/damon/core.c
>> index 3e1890d64d06..5cd1f0aed66b 100644
>> --- a/mm/damon/core.c
>> +++ b/mm/damon/core.c
>> @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
>> #include <linux/slab.h>
>> #include <linux/string.h>
>> #include <linux/string_choices.h>
>> +#include <linux/freezer.h>
>>
>> #define CREATE_TRACE_POINTS
>> #include <trace/events/damon.h>
>> @@ -2753,6 +2754,7 @@ static int kdamond_fn(void *data)
>>
>> complete(&ctx->kdamond_started);
>> kdamond_init_ctx(ctx);
>> + set_freezable();
>>
>> if (ctx->ops.init)
>> ctx->ops.init(ctx);
>> @@ -2774,6 +2776,8 @@ static int kdamond_fn(void *data)
>> unsigned long next_ops_update_sis = ctx->next_ops_update_sis;
>> unsigned long sample_interval = ctx->attrs.sample_interval;
>>
>> + try_to_freeze();
>> +
>> if (kdamond_wait_activation(ctx))
>> break;
>>
>> --
>> 2.43.0
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 5995 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] mm/damon: support freeze kdamond
2026-04-08 14:07 ` SeongJae Park
2026-04-09 7:00 ` linruifeng (A)
@ 2026-04-09 7:20 ` linruifeng (A)
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: linruifeng (A) @ 2026-04-09 7:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: SeongJae Park
Cc: akpm, chenjun102, tongtiangen, damon, linux-mm, linux-kernel
Hello SJ,
Thank you for your reply. Based on my current knowledge, I think this can be
described from three aspects:
1、kdamond monitors physical/virtual addresses and performs certain
actions based
on the monitoring results to improve system/process efficiency. When the
system
undergoes suspend/resume, most user-space processes are in a suspended
state.
kdamond may therefore perform operations such as PAGEOUT /
MADV_NOHUGEPAGE, but
these are not true data monitoring results. This may cause changes in
the efficiency
of certain processes after system resume. Therefore, I believe that
continuing to
run kdamond during suspend is meaningless and may even have negative
effects.
2、When performing hibernate, most of the used memory in the system is
swapped out to
disk. When memory is large, this is time-consuming. If kdamond does not
sleep, it may
affect hibernate efficiency.
3、As discussed in [1]: "The principal reason is to prevent filesystems
from being damaged
after hibernation. At the moment we have no simple means of
checkpointing filesystems, so if
there are any modifications made to filesystem data and/or metadata on
disks, we cannot bring
them back to the state from before the modifications. At the same time
each hibernation image
contains some filesystem-related information that must be consistent
with the state of the on
disk data and metadata after the system memory state has been restored
from the image (otherwise
the filesystems will be damaged in a nasty way, usually making them
almost impossible to repair).
We therefore freeze tasks that might cause the on-disk filesystems' data
and metadata to be modified
after the hibernation image has been created and before the system is
finally powered off. The majority
of these are user space processes, but if any of the kernel threads may
cause something like this to
happen, they have to be freezable." During suspend/resume, processes
involving I/O operations should
be frozen.
Based on the above reasons, I believe it is reasonable to support
freezing kdamond. If there are any
errors in my thinking, please point them out.
Thans,
Lin Ruifeng
在 2026/4/8 22:07, SeongJae Park 写道:
> Hello Lin,
>
>
> Thank you for sharing this patch.
>
> On Wed, 8 Apr 2026 16:06:52 +0800 Lin Ruifeng <linruifeng4@huawei.com> wrote:
>
>> During suspend and resume, the data monitored by kdamond is
>> no longer meaningful. Meanwhile, since kdamond may involve
>> I/O operations, it is necessary to freeze it.
> I'm not used to PM freezer, and maybe because of that, I'm not fully
> understanding the motivation of this patch. Could you please elaborate the
> existing problem and how this patch is fixing or improving it?
>
>
> Thanks,
> SJ
>
>> Signed-off-by: Lin Ruifeng <linruifeng4@huawei.com>
>> ---
>> mm/damon/core.c | 4 ++++
>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/mm/damon/core.c b/mm/damon/core.c
>> index 3e1890d64d06..5cd1f0aed66b 100644
>> --- a/mm/damon/core.c
>> +++ b/mm/damon/core.c
>> @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
>> #include <linux/slab.h>
>> #include <linux/string.h>
>> #include <linux/string_choices.h>
>> +#include <linux/freezer.h>
>>
>> #define CREATE_TRACE_POINTS
>> #include <trace/events/damon.h>
>> @@ -2753,6 +2754,7 @@ static int kdamond_fn(void *data)
>>
>> complete(&ctx->kdamond_started);
>> kdamond_init_ctx(ctx);
>> + set_freezable();
>>
>> if (ctx->ops.init)
>> ctx->ops.init(ctx);
>> @@ -2774,6 +2776,8 @@ static int kdamond_fn(void *data)
>> unsigned long next_ops_update_sis = ctx->next_ops_update_sis;
>> unsigned long sample_interval = ctx->attrs.sample_interval;
>>
>> + try_to_freeze();
>> +
>> if (kdamond_wait_activation(ctx))
>> break;
>>
>> --
>> 2.43.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-04-09 7:20 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-04-08 8:06 [PATCH] mm/damon: support freeze kdamond Lin Ruifeng
2026-04-08 14:07 ` SeongJae Park
2026-04-09 7:00 ` linruifeng (A)
2026-04-09 7:20 ` linruifeng (A)
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox