From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
penberg@kernel.org, David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
osalvador@suse.de, linmiaohe@huawei.com, steven.price@arm.com,
Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>,
"Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>,
Linux MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] mm: introduce PAGE_FLAGS() to make output of page flags better
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2021 11:15:21 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1acfa7dd-3662-0a60-41e7-ae3ead8aeeb8@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALOAHbCJYiWxVimYOhZQisqvOqR+oDKhBp-6qRu_NgnOcmTkuw@mail.gmail.com>
On 15.01.21 11:10, Yafang Shao wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 4:39 PM David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 15.01.21 07:13, Yafang Shao wrote:
>>> There're totally __NR_PAGEFLAGS page flags, but the type of page->flags is
>>> unsigned long, that makes the value of page->flags a little misleading when
>>> it is printed to the user. We'd better print the real pages flags, instead
>>> of the whole 64bits including the random values in the useless high bits.
>>
>> No, these are *not* random values. They include the nid, zid, and
>> section_nr - which are helpful to have at hand when debugging, or
>> detecting that something might be messed up there.
>>
>
> Thanks for the explanation. I just noticed the page-flags layout in
> page-flags-layout.h.
>
>>>
>>> There're two choices to achieve that, one of which is clear the useless
>>
>> Again, not useless.
>>
>>> high bits when we initlize the page->flags, the other is don't print the
>>> high bits when it is showed to the user. The latter one is better because
>>> it is in the slow path and the performance won't be impacted.
>>>
>>> Before that change, the output is,
>>> [ 8846.517809] INFO: Slab 0x00000000f42a2c60 objects=33 used=3 fp=0x0000000060d32ca8 flags=0x17ffffc0010200(slab|head)
>>>
>>> After that change, the output is,
>>> [ 8843.757770] INFO: Slab 0x00000000f0e98335 objects=33 used=3 fp=0x00000000b643c7d8 flags=0x10200(slab|head)
>>>
>>
>> Nack to the current approach. If you're going to strip this information,
>> you should expose it differently. E.g., printing page_zonenum() or
>> page_to_nid(). But still, then we might lose valuable information of
>> bits stored in there that shouldn't have been set.
>>
>
> How about changing the implementation of pGp in printk() ?
> In the new implementation of pGp we can dump the full information of
> page->flags, rather than the flag's name only.
>
> For example,
> 0xXXXXXXXX(node n, nid n, ..., slab|head)
>
> That will make it easier to understand, as it is not easy to look into
> the detail of page-flags layout.
Not completely opposed to this. Just keep in mind that the information
stored in the high bits differs per configuration. See
include/linux/page-flags-layout.h
So to dump reliably, you would have to consider all different flavors,
looking at SECTIONS_WIDTH, NODES_WIDTH, ZONES_WIDTH, LAST_CPUPID_WIDTH,
KASAN_TAG_WIDTH
Might be helpful for other users as well, like in mm/memory-failure.c
--
Thanks,
David / dhildenb
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-15 10:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-15 6:13 [PATCH 0/2] mm: improve the output of print_page_info() Yafang Shao
2021-01-15 6:13 ` [PATCH 1/2] mm, slub: use pGp to print page flags Yafang Shao
2021-01-15 8:46 ` David Hildenbrand
2021-01-15 10:14 ` Yafang Shao
2021-01-15 6:13 ` [PATCH 2/2] mm: introduce PAGE_FLAGS() to make output of page flags better Yafang Shao
2021-01-15 8:39 ` David Hildenbrand
2021-01-15 10:10 ` Yafang Shao
2021-01-15 10:15 ` David Hildenbrand [this message]
2021-01-15 10:17 ` Yafang Shao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1acfa7dd-3662-0a60-41e7-ae3ead8aeeb8@redhat.com \
--to=david@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=guro@fb.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
--cc=laoar.shao@gmail.com \
--cc=linmiaohe@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=osalvador@suse.de \
--cc=penberg@kernel.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=steven.price@arm.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox