From: Kevin Brodsky <kevin.brodsky@arm.com>
To: "Ritesh Harjani (IBM)" <ritesh.list@gmail.com>, linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
Andreas Larsson <andreas@gaisler.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>, Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>,
"Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>,
Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>, Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Yeoreum Yun <yeoreum.yun@arm.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org,
xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, x86@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 05/12] mm: introduce CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_LAZY_MMU_MODE
Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2025 10:33:24 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1ac5be9f-fc05-463f-9512-74922acf8980@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87o6ph3xdq.ritesh.list@gmail.com>
On 05/11/2025 04:40, Ritesh Harjani (IBM) wrote:
> Kevin Brodsky <kevin.brodsky@arm.com> writes:
>
>> Architectures currently opt in for implementing lazy_mmu helpers by
>> defining __HAVE_ARCH_ENTER_LAZY_MMU_MODE.
>>
>> In preparation for introducing a generic lazy_mmu layer that will
>> require storage in task_struct, let's switch to a cleaner approach:
>> instead of defining a macro, select a CONFIG option.
>>
>> This patch introduces CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_LAZY_MMU_MODE and has each
>> arch select it when it implements lazy_mmu helpers.
>> __HAVE_ARCH_ENTER_LAZY_MMU_MODE is removed and <linux/pgtable.h>
>> relies on the new CONFIG instead.
>>
>> On x86, lazy_mmu helpers are only implemented if PARAVIRT_XXL is
>> selected. This creates some complications in arch/x86/boot/, because
>> a few files manually undefine PARAVIRT* options. As a result
>> <asm/paravirt.h> does not define the lazy_mmu helpers, but this
>> breaks the build as <linux/pgtable.h> only defines them if
>> !CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_LAZY_MMU_MODE. There does not seem to be a clean
>> way out of this - let's just undefine that new CONFIG too.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Kevin Brodsky <kevin.brodsky@arm.com>
>> ---
>> arch/arm64/Kconfig | 1 +
>> arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h | 1 -
>> arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/tlbflush-hash.h | 2 --
>> arch/powerpc/platforms/Kconfig.cputype | 1 +
>> arch/sparc/Kconfig | 1 +
>> arch/sparc/include/asm/tlbflush_64.h | 2 --
>> arch/x86/Kconfig | 1 +
>> arch/x86/boot/compressed/misc.h | 1 +
>> arch/x86/boot/startup/sme.c | 1 +
>> arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt.h | 1 -
>> include/linux/pgtable.h | 2 +-
>> mm/Kconfig | 3 +++
>> 12 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> Maybe we can add this to ... ?
>
> Documentation/features/vm/lazy_mmu/arch-support.txt
>
> #
> # Feature name: lazy_mmu mode
> # Kconfig: ARCH_HAS_LAZY_MMU_MODE
> # description: arch supports arch_{enter|flush|leave}_lazy_mmu_mode()
> #
> -----------------------
> | arch |status|
> -----------------------
> | arm64: | ok |
> | powerpc: | ok |
> | sparc: | ok |
> | x86: | ok |
> -----------------------
That's an interesting idea but I'm not sure it really makes sense for
lazy MMU? AFAIU these arch-support.txt files are meant to help identify
which generic features an arch has support for. Lazy MMU isn't really a
feature though, in the sense that what it does is entirely defined by
the arch. This patch does introduce a generic layer, but ultimately it
remains a collection of arch hooks.
> As for this patch, the changes are mostly straight forward around the
> configs part. This looks good to me. Please feel free to add:
>
> Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
Thanks for the review!
- Kevin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-06 10:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 80+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-29 10:08 [PATCH v4 00/12] Nesting support for lazy MMU mode Kevin Brodsky
2025-10-29 10:08 ` [PATCH v4 01/12] powerpc/64s: Do not re-activate batched TLB flush Kevin Brodsky
2025-11-01 12:05 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-11-05 2:46 ` Ritesh Harjani
2025-11-06 10:29 ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-11-08 0:35 ` Ritesh Harjani
2025-11-10 13:18 ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-11-07 12:25 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-11-07 12:28 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-10-29 10:08 ` [PATCH v4 02/12] x86/xen: simplify flush_lazy_mmu() Kevin Brodsky
2025-11-01 12:14 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-11-03 18:06 ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-11-07 12:31 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-11-10 10:36 ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-11-11 10:08 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-11-07 15:45 ` Jürgen Groß
2025-10-29 10:09 ` [PATCH v4 03/12] powerpc/mm: implement arch_flush_lazy_mmu_mode() Kevin Brodsky
2025-11-01 12:14 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-11-05 3:15 ` Ritesh Harjani
2025-11-05 9:49 ` Ritesh Harjani
2025-11-06 10:31 ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-10-29 10:09 ` [PATCH v4 04/12] sparc/mm: " Kevin Brodsky
2025-11-01 12:14 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-10-29 10:09 ` [PATCH v4 05/12] mm: introduce CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_LAZY_MMU_MODE Kevin Brodsky
2025-11-01 12:16 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-11-05 4:40 ` Ritesh Harjani
2025-11-06 10:33 ` Kevin Brodsky [this message]
2025-11-07 13:56 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-11-10 10:37 ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-10-29 10:09 ` [PATCH v4 06/12] mm: introduce generic lazy_mmu helpers Kevin Brodsky
2025-11-01 12:18 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-11-07 14:26 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-11-07 14:34 ` David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)
2025-11-07 15:22 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-11-10 8:11 ` Alexander Gordeev
2025-11-10 9:19 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-11-11 8:01 ` Alexander Gordeev
2025-11-11 12:16 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-11-10 10:45 ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-11-24 12:47 ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-11-24 14:36 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-10-29 10:09 ` [PATCH v4 07/12] mm: enable lazy_mmu sections to nest Kevin Brodsky
2025-10-29 16:41 ` Alexander Gordeev
2025-10-30 10:28 ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-10-30 16:34 ` Alexander Gordeev
2025-11-01 12:22 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-11-03 18:08 ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-11-05 8:49 ` Ritesh Harjani
2025-11-05 16:12 ` Alexander Gordeev
2025-11-06 10:51 ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-11-06 15:33 ` Alexander Gordeev
2025-11-07 10:16 ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-11-06 16:32 ` Ritesh Harjani
2025-11-06 17:01 ` Ritesh Harjani
2025-11-07 11:13 ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-11-07 14:59 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-11-10 10:47 ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-11-11 10:24 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-11-11 15:56 ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-11-11 17:03 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-11-12 10:42 ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-11-12 13:57 ` David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)
2025-10-29 10:09 ` [PATCH v4 08/12] arm64: mm: replace TIF_LAZY_MMU with in_lazy_mmu_mode() Kevin Brodsky
2025-11-03 16:03 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-11-03 18:25 ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-11-07 15:28 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-10-29 10:09 ` [PATCH v4 09/12] powerpc/mm: replace batch->active " Kevin Brodsky
2025-11-03 16:05 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-11-04 11:33 ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-11-05 9:40 ` Ritesh Harjani
2025-10-29 10:09 ` [PATCH v4 10/12] sparc/mm: " Kevin Brodsky
2025-11-03 16:11 ` David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)
2025-10-29 10:09 ` [PATCH v4 11/12] x86/xen: use lazy_mmu_state when context-switching Kevin Brodsky
2025-11-03 16:15 ` David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)
2025-11-03 18:29 ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-11-03 19:23 ` David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)
2025-11-04 11:28 ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-10-29 10:09 ` [PATCH v4 12/12] mm: bail out of lazy_mmu_mode_* in interrupt context Kevin Brodsky
2025-11-07 15:42 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-11-10 10:48 ` Kevin Brodsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1ac5be9f-fc05-463f-9512-74922acf8980@arm.com \
--to=kevin.brodsky@arm.com \
--cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andreas@gaisler.com \
--cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
--cc=maddy@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
--cc=yeoreum.yun@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox