From: Yang Shi <yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com, hannes@cmpxchg.org,
vbabka@suse.cz, rientjes@google.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH 1/2 -mm] mm: account lazy free pages separately
Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2019 09:19:13 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1a3c4185-c7ab-8d6f-8191-77dce02025a7@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190809083216.GM18351@dhcp22.suse.cz>
On 8/9/19 1:32 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Fri 09-08-19 07:57:44, Yang Shi wrote:
>> When doing partial unmap to THP, the pages in the affected range would
>> be considered to be reclaimable when memory pressure comes in. And,
>> such pages would be put on deferred split queue and get minus from the
>> memory statistics (i.e. /proc/meminfo).
>>
>> For example, when doing THP split test, /proc/meminfo would show:
>>
>> Before put on lazy free list:
>> MemTotal: 45288336 kB
>> MemFree: 43281376 kB
>> MemAvailable: 43254048 kB
>> ...
>> Active(anon): 1096296 kB
>> Inactive(anon): 8372 kB
>> ...
>> AnonPages: 1096264 kB
>> ...
>> AnonHugePages: 1056768 kB
>>
>> After put on lazy free list:
>> MemTotal: 45288336 kB
>> MemFree: 43282612 kB
>> MemAvailable: 43255284 kB
>> ...
>> Active(anon): 1094228 kB
>> Inactive(anon): 8372 kB
>> ...
>> AnonPages: 49668 kB
>> ...
>> AnonHugePages: 10240 kB
>>
>> The THPs confusingly look disappeared although they are still on LRU if
>> you are not familair the tricks done by kernel.
> Is this a fallout of the recent deferred freeing work?
This series follows up the discussion happened when reviewing "Make
deferred split shrinker memcg aware".
David Rientjes suggested deferred split THP should be accounted into
available memory since they would be shrunk when memory pressure comes
in, just like MADV_FREE pages. For the discussion, please refer to:
https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org/msg2010115.html
>
>> Accounted the lazy free pages to NR_LAZYFREE, and show them in meminfo
>> and other places. With the change the /proc/meminfo would look like:
>> Before put on lazy free list:
> The name is really confusing because I have thought of MADV_FREE immediately.
Yes, I agree. We may use a more specific name, i.e. DeferredSplitTHP.
>
>> +LazyFreePages: Cleanly freeable pages under memory pressure (i.e. deferred
>> + split THP).
> What does that mean actually? I have hard time imagine what cleanly
> freeable pages mean.
Like deferred split THP and MADV_FREE pages, they could be reclaimed
during memory pressure.
If you just go with "DeferredSplitTHP", these ambiguity would go away.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-08-09 16:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-08-08 23:57 Yang Shi
2019-08-08 23:57 ` [RESEND PATCH 2/2 -mm] mm: account lazy free pages into available memory Yang Shi
2019-08-09 8:32 ` [RESEND PATCH 1/2 -mm] mm: account lazy free pages separately Michal Hocko
2019-08-09 16:19 ` Yang Shi [this message]
2019-08-09 18:02 ` Michal Hocko
2019-08-09 18:26 ` Yang Shi
2019-08-09 23:54 ` Yang Shi
2019-08-12 9:34 ` Michal Hocko
2019-08-12 17:00 ` Yang Shi
2019-08-14 11:08 ` Michal Hocko
2019-08-15 4:51 ` Yang Shi
2019-08-15 8:46 ` Michal Hocko
2019-08-14 12:55 ` Vlastimil Babka
2019-08-15 4:54 ` Yang Shi
2019-08-14 12:49 ` Vlastimil Babka
2019-08-14 12:53 ` Michal Hocko
2019-08-15 4:53 ` Yang Shi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1a3c4185-c7ab-8d6f-8191-77dce02025a7@linux.alibaba.com \
--to=yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox