From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp3.akamai.com (vwall1.sanmateo.corp.akamai.com [172.23.1.71]) by smtp3.akamai.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j0R6UVNX025611 for ; Wed, 26 Jan 2005 22:30:32 -0800 (PST) content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Subject: RE: [patch] ptrace: unlocked access to last_siginfo (resending) Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 22:30:10 -0800 Message-ID: <1CEE377DC97AED448AB93CF602C983E450F421@usca1ex-priv1.sanmateo.corp.akamai.com> From: "Meda, Prasanna" Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Roland McGrath Cc: akpm@osdl.org, linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: > That's correct. Technically you don't need read_lock_irq, but just > spin_lock_irq, not that it really makes a difference. Myself, I would > change that and also use struct assignment instead of memcpy. > But your patch is fine as it is. Agreed, and I am going to preapre a patch based on your suggestions and resend. Thanks, Prasanna -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: aart@kvack.org