From: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
To: <linmiaohe@huawei.com>, <david@redhat.com>, <jane.chu@oracle.com>
Cc: <kernel@pankajraghav.com>, <ziy@nvidia.com>,
<akpm@linux-foundation.org>, <mcgrof@kernel.org>,
<nao.horiguchi@gmail.com>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>,
Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>,
"Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>,
Nico Pache <npache@redhat.com>,
Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>, Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>,
Barry Song <baohua@kernel.org>, Lance Yang <lance.yang@linux.dev>,
"Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@infradead.org>,
Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>,
Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com>, <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] Optimize folio split in memory failure
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2025 16:47:08 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1AE28DE5-1E0A-432B-B21B-61E0E3F54909@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251022033531.389351-1-ziy@nvidia.com>
On 21 Oct 2025, at 23:35, Zi Yan wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This patchset is a follow-up of "[PATCH v3] mm/huge_memory: do not change
> split_huge_page*() target order silently."[1]. It improves how memory
> failure code handles large block size(LBS) folios with
> min_order_for_split() > 0. By splitting a large folio containing HW
> poisoned pages to min_order_for_split(), the after-split folios without
> HW poisoned pages could be freed for reuse. To achieve this, folio split
> code needs to set has_hwpoisoned on after-split folios containing HW
> poisoned pages.
>
> This patchset includes:
> 1. A patch sets has_hwpoisoned on the right after-split folios after
> scanning all pages in the folios,
Based on the discussion with David[1], this patch will be sent separately
as a hotfix. The remaining patches will be sent out after Patch 1 is picked
up. Please note that I will address David's feedback in the new version of
Patch 1. Sorry for the inconvenience.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/d3d05898-5530-4990-9d61-8268bd483765@redhat.com/
> 2. A patch adds split_huge_page_to_order(),
> 3. Patch 2 and Patch 3 of "[PATCH v2 0/3] Do not change split folio target
> order"[2],
>
> This patchset is based on mm-new.
>
> Changelog
> ===
> From V2[2]:
> 1. Patch 1 is sent separately as a hotfix[1].
> 2. set has_hwpoisoned on after-split folios if any contains HW poisoned
> pages.
> 3. added split_huge_page_to_order().
> 4. added a missing newline after variable decalaration.
> 5. added /* release= */ to try_to_split_thp_page().
> 6. restructured try_to_split_thp_page() in memory_failure().
> 7. fixed a typo.
> 8. clarified the comment in soft_offline_in_use_page().
>
>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20251017013630.139907-1-ziy@nvidia.com/ [1]
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20251016033452.125479-1-ziy@nvidia.com/ [2]
>
> Zi Yan (4):
> mm/huge_memory: preserve PG_has_hwpoisoned if a folio is split to >0
> order
> mm/huge_memory: add split_huge_page_to_order()
> mm/memory-failure: improve large block size folio handling.
> mm/huge_memory: fix kernel-doc comments for folio_split() and related.
>
> include/linux/huge_mm.h | 22 ++++++++++++-----
> mm/huge_memory.c | 55 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> mm/memory-failure.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++++---
> 3 files changed, 82 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.51.0
--
Best Regards,
Yan, Zi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-22 20:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-22 3:35 Zi Yan
2025-10-22 3:35 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] mm/huge_memory: preserve PG_has_hwpoisoned if a folio is split to >0 order Zi Yan
2025-10-22 20:09 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-10-22 20:27 ` Zi Yan
2025-10-22 20:34 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-10-22 20:40 ` Zi Yan
2025-10-24 15:58 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-10-25 15:21 ` Zi Yan
2025-10-22 3:35 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] mm/huge_memory: add split_huge_page_to_order() Zi Yan
2025-10-22 20:13 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-10-24 16:11 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-10-22 3:35 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] mm/memory-failure: improve large block size folio handling Zi Yan
2025-10-22 20:17 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-10-22 20:29 ` Zi Yan
2025-10-24 18:11 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-10-22 3:35 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] mm/huge_memory: fix kernel-doc comments for folio_split() and related Zi Yan
2025-10-22 20:18 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-10-22 20:47 ` Zi Yan [this message]
2025-10-22 20:47 ` [PATCH v3 0/4] Optimize folio split in memory failure Zi Yan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1AE28DE5-1E0A-432B-B21B-61E0E3F54909@nvidia.com \
--to=ziy@nvidia.com \
--cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=baohua@kernel.org \
--cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=dev.jain@arm.com \
--cc=jane.chu@oracle.com \
--cc=kernel@pankajraghav.com \
--cc=lance.yang@linux.dev \
--cc=linmiaohe@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
--cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
--cc=nao.horiguchi@gmail.com \
--cc=npache@redhat.com \
--cc=richard.weiyang@gmail.com \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=shy828301@gmail.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox