linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@c-s.fr>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
	Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] mm: add probe_user_read()
Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2019 22:11:50 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <19c99d33-b796-72df-4212-20255f84efa0@c-s.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190108114803.583f203b86d4a368ac9796f3@linux-foundation.org>



Le 08/01/2019 à 20:48, Andrew Morton a écrit :
> On Tue,  8 Jan 2019 07:37:44 +0000 (UTC) Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@c-s.fr> wrote:
> 
>> In powerpc code, there are several places implementing safe
>> access to user data. This is sometimes implemented using
>> probe_kernel_address() with additional access_ok() verification,
>> sometimes with get_user() enclosed in a pagefault_disable()/enable()
>> pair, etc. :
>>      show_user_instructions()
>>      bad_stack_expansion()
>>      p9_hmi_special_emu()
>>      fsl_pci_mcheck_exception()
>>      read_user_stack_64()
>>      read_user_stack_32() on PPC64
>>      read_user_stack_32() on PPC32
>>      power_pmu_bhrb_to()
>>
>> In the same spirit as probe_kernel_read(), this patch adds
>> probe_user_read().
>>
>> probe_user_read() does the same as probe_kernel_read() but
>> first checks that it is really a user address.
>>
>> ...
>>
>> --- a/include/linux/uaccess.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/uaccess.h
>> @@ -263,6 +263,40 @@ extern long strncpy_from_unsafe(char *dst, const void *unsafe_addr, long count);
>>   #define probe_kernel_address(addr, retval)		\
>>   	probe_kernel_read(&retval, addr, sizeof(retval))
>>   
>> +/**
>> + * probe_user_read(): safely attempt to read from a user location
>> + * @dst: pointer to the buffer that shall take the data
>> + * @src: address to read from
>> + * @size: size of the data chunk
>> + *
>> + * Returns: 0 on success, -EFAULT on error.
>> + *
>> + * Safely read from address @src to the buffer at @dst.  If a kernel fault
>> + * happens, handle that and return -EFAULT.
>> + *
>> + * We ensure that the copy_from_user is executed in atomic context so that
>> + * do_page_fault() doesn't attempt to take mmap_sem.  This makes
>> + * probe_user_read() suitable for use within regions where the caller
>> + * already holds mmap_sem, or other locks which nest inside mmap_sem.
>> + */
>> +
>> +#ifndef probe_user_read
>> +static __always_inline long probe_user_read(void *dst, const void __user *src,
>> +					    size_t size)
>> +{
>> +	long ret;
>> +
>> +	if (!access_ok(src, size))
>> +		return -EFAULT;
>> +
>> +	pagefault_disable();
>> +	ret = __copy_from_user_inatomic(dst, src, size);
>> +	pagefault_enable();
>> +
>> +	return ret ? -EFAULT : 0;
>> +}
>> +#endif
> 
> Why was the __always_inline needed?
> 
> This function is pretty large.  Why is it inlined?
> 

Kees told to do that way, see https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/986848/

Christophe

  reply	other threads:[~2019-01-08 21:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-01-08  7:37 Christophe Leroy
2019-01-08  7:37 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] powerpc: use probe_user_read() Christophe Leroy
2019-01-08  9:04   ` David Hildenbrand
2019-01-08  9:19     ` Christophe Leroy
2019-01-08  9:37   ` Christophe Leroy
2019-01-08  9:58     ` Russell Currey
2019-01-08  9:58       ` Russell Currey
2019-01-08  7:51 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] mm: add probe_user_read() Mike Rapoport
2019-01-08 19:48 ` Andrew Morton
2019-01-08 21:11   ` Christophe Leroy [this message]
2019-01-08 21:14     ` Kees Cook
2019-01-08 21:14       ` Kees Cook

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=19c99d33-b796-72df-4212-20255f84efa0@c-s.fr \
    --to=christophe.leroy@c-s.fr \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=rppt@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox