From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A1E4C433EF for ; Wed, 20 Jul 2022 01:31:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id B0DF06B0072; Tue, 19 Jul 2022 21:31:52 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id ABDB86B0073; Tue, 19 Jul 2022 21:31:52 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 985FE6B0074; Tue, 19 Jul 2022 21:31:52 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from relay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0010.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.10]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 894176B0072 for ; Tue, 19 Jul 2022 21:31:52 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin30.hostedemail.com (a10.router.float.18 [10.200.18.1]) by unirelay10.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A8D8C0362 for ; Wed, 20 Jul 2022 01:31:52 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 79705751664.30.1D7CDD6 Received: from mail-qk1-f175.google.com (mail-qk1-f175.google.com [209.85.222.175]) by imf10.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0107AC000A for ; Wed, 20 Jul 2022 01:31:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qk1-f175.google.com with SMTP id g1so11890286qki.7 for ; Tue, 19 Jul 2022 18:31:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject:content-language:to :cc:references:from:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=AtMEgJwqgzRjiyHQFY73y+e82U1rR+yNa9cRQVtZqJg=; b=JDL7Vm+f723/K5qgHietHufAHe6xEygeLdDSHughUfYIG3tORNp42yxMfr4LQqXjlW FB3q6QZcg7HiF9sICAi3urc5asGX0vWwn67ZwsHDEjGSgyC7Y8Wy94VDnSBh+bPh1KCO uWJ/xOU6p5kSsC4B4WRJXdh0j+CCA8lIO56LweBgBSIZTC83OKJr6qYlRBWErxDAwb1H 4k/u8lmE0/eZtEyXBw/swwhUQ6JW/lM97is0k98FK3jBy9i0u+2SsYBj0m2I3k9O7CqN JNZZwdIQOeJpeDosW9vj1tkG4f+KBxa63/W+fTV6dqSFwY2D9NOf2uNuqIaDeRSZpGEg lmcQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject :content-language:to:cc:references:from:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=AtMEgJwqgzRjiyHQFY73y+e82U1rR+yNa9cRQVtZqJg=; b=fQvyhCS2kkVyDeM7AW6e8+s3k3Ad8WKNVYQ/Lz89v4MBy+30dXfVegR0lDIimsREZM 4TBD0qQSGhFZCoEeCDN2DSlxameiQkM1IRLTg87smbQRk+oOdd5YXjB4u/J9sK3JtR5H z9YszEns8Ulp8SsT1MWPiPs5xw54nxqxDn8g2fRcrOCM7eVmQxN+Bvu37Ct7XV9toJXQ YpbMRlpi2UAhSD9f54iglmNTg7tlmahMpFV2mz/8wcnVVJZEa+1QSUSfOiShowx+KJWk kzRvkW8uWq0eVweRT+oaJtVKGUy34ZwDnkukFbF4UTADa+JWktatj6zZPEAKdBwscHyG wS+g== X-Gm-Message-State: AJIora8UQFWmN8CJkv/56VaKtZeq6YkNQMz6E4bd1y5EXB2UiPkDotrd mbb0CvuVkOBQl7vmYUEGkA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1sd5ltxxF/vOEbWSEiGGV5BuvPbMEZWDWSJXKzOFuKitTHspxtawWKkiyD3FCcuily70/lVpQ== X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:410c:b0:6b2:82d8:dcae with SMTP id j12-20020a05620a410c00b006b282d8dcaemr22769103qko.259.1658280711243; Tue, 19 Jul 2022 18:31:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.161] (c-73-219-103-14.hsd1.vt.comcast.net. [73.219.103.14]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id dm53-20020a05620a1d7500b006b4880b08a9sm16015951qkb.88.2022.07.19.18.31.49 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 19 Jul 2022 18:31:50 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <19c1a301-13ca-d7cf-c0f6-a63f75b7f8eb@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2022 21:31:49 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.11.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/34] Printbufs - new data structure for building strings Content-Language: en-US To: Steven Rostedt Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, pmladek@suse.com, enozhatsky@chromium.org, linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk, willy@infradead.org References: <20220620004233.3805-1-kent.overstreet@gmail.com> <20220719191522.4002a5fb@gandalf.local.home> <7462e934-f746-eef7-ff92-0eeb8cc08b82@gmail.com> <20220719200507.361b06ee@rorschach.local.home> <20220719211156.75ea9255@rorschach.local.home> From: Kent Overstreet In-Reply-To: <20220719211156.75ea9255@rorschach.local.home> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; imf10.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20210112 header.b=JDL7Vm+f; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (imf10.hostedemail.com: domain of kent.overstreet@gmail.com designates 209.85.222.175 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=kent.overstreet@gmail.com ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hostedemail.com; s=arc-20220608; t=1658280712; h=from:from:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:dkim-signature; bh=AtMEgJwqgzRjiyHQFY73y+e82U1rR+yNa9cRQVtZqJg=; b=18avruJcJzXKrUgqHH2P1aNsdy3og5u/72ahJQeK/0bMJBzH4/wYn6LhRveb5bi3iW61lQ cJvDuqjB7/5XTbMppOqntjS/qzPYX2GVrCSXvbrX3I2ID9AcVkIMr9s/6rxWzdACMV/WZc c6rfgmxdsRnpFaAdSQN7RSRuYfz4jHA= ARC-Seal: i=1; s=arc-20220608; d=hostedemail.com; t=1658280712; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=jsyz0QG87/PtejYstHXSI2iSXgCBqOOUQj9GV1+8cbftriSa8kwLUQRzx9VMclSS6ZLjQn IR7OBeAv4gkZZ3PkbWjPPyTRjzTw34w24jqHwIiYEAXyV0O3wbW69gVebmJuCACNydXSzV iKB7RtXT33U0dzsSVYL0XjDn8NYjfYs= X-Stat-Signature: ckmnte3rtkoax97p85fqktnt8fhbabaz X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 0107AC000A X-Rspam-User: Authentication-Results: imf10.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20210112 header.b=JDL7Vm+f; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (imf10.hostedemail.com: domain of kent.overstreet@gmail.com designates 209.85.222.175 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=kent.overstreet@gmail.com X-Rspamd-Server: rspam11 X-HE-Tag: 1658280711-93274 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On 7/19/22 21:11, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Tue, 19 Jul 2022 20:17:45 -0400 > Kent Overstreet wrote: > >>> More specific please. >> >> Steve, look at the man page for snprintf if you don't see what I mean. >> This discussion has become entirely too tedious, and your _only_ >> contribution to the discussion on pretty-printers has been "why isn't >> this using this thing I made?". > > No, my response is, why should we replace something that is working > just fine? For you. For your code. Look, Steve, I've tried to work with you. And I've given you reasons why seq_buf doesn't work for vsprintf.c, and more general cases. You have not responded _at all_ with technical reasons or discussion, all you've done from the very start is lecture me on process. And, to be blunt, the time to have the printbuf vs. seq_buf discussion was months ago. I tried to start that discussion with you, and you ghosted on IRC when I started talking about the things in seq_buf that would have to change. Like I said, I'll CC you when v5 is posted.