From: kanoj@google.engr.sgi.com (Kanoj Sarcar)
To: Ralf Baechle <ralf@oss.sgi.com>
Cc: manfreds@colorfullife.com, sct@redhat.com, viro@math.psu.edu,
andrea@suse.de, linux-kernel@vger.rutgers.edu,
mingo@chiara.csoma.elte.hu, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com, linux-mips@fnet.fr,
linux-mips@vger.rutgers.edu
Subject: Re: locking question: do_mmap(), do_munmap()
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 1999 10:50:11 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <199910151750.KAA99441@google.engr.sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <19991015115816.B948@uni-koblenz.de> from "Ralf Baechle" at Oct 15, 99 11:58:16 am
>
> On Wed, Oct 13, 1999 at 09:32:54AM +0200, Manfred Spraul wrote:
>
> > Kanoj Sarcar wrote:
> > > Here's a primitive patch showing the direction I am thinking of. I do not
> > > have any problem with a spinning lock, but I coded this against 2.2.10,
> > > where insert_vm_struct could go to sleep, hence I had to use sleeping
> > > locks to protect the vma chain.
> >
> > I found a few places where I don't know how to change them.
> >
> > 1) arch/mips/mm/r4xx0.c:
> > their flush_cache_range() function internally calls find_vma().
> > flush_cache_range() is called by proc/mem.c, and it seems that this
> > function cannot get the mmap semaphore.
> > Currently, every caller of flush_cache_range() either owns the kernel
> > lock or the mmap_sem.
> > OTHO, this function contains a race anyway [src_vma can go away if
> > handle_mm_fault() sleeps, src_vma is used at the end of the function.]
>
> The sole reason for fiddling with the VMA is that we try to optimize
> icache flushing for non-VM_EXEC vmas. This optimization is broken
> as the MIPS hardware doesn't make a difference between read and execute
> in page permissions, so the icache might be dirty even though the vma
> has no exec permission. So I'll have to re-implement this whole things
> anyway. The other problem is an efficience problem. A call like
> flush_cache_range(some_mm_ptr, 0, TASK_SIZE) would take a minor eternity
> and for MIPS64 a full eternity ...
>
> Ralf
Ralf,
Looking in 2.3.21, all the find_vma's in arch/mips/mm/r4xx0.c are used to
set a flag called "text" which is not used at all. Also, if the find_vma
returns null, the code basically does nothing. So the optimized icache
flushing is probably not implemented yet? Then, the only reason to
do the flush_vma currently is to check whether the lower level flush
routine should be called. Without holding some locks, this is always
tricky to do on a third party mm.
Btw, this probably belongs to linux-mips, but what do you mean by saying
the icache might be dirty? Its been a while since I worked on the
older mips chips, but as far as I remember, the icache can not hold
dirty lines.
Kanoj
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://humbolt.geo.uu.nl/Linux-MM/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1999-10-15 17:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <Pine.LNX.4.10.9910101713010.364-100000@alpha.random>
1999-10-10 15:52 ` Manfred Spraul
1999-10-10 16:07 ` Alexander Viro
1999-10-10 16:25 ` Alexander Viro
1999-10-10 16:45 ` Manfred Spraul
1999-10-10 17:25 ` Alexander Viro
1999-10-10 17:12 ` Andrea Arcangeli
1999-10-10 17:48 ` Alexander Viro
1999-10-10 18:42 ` Manfred Spraul
1999-10-10 19:03 ` Alexander Viro
1999-10-10 21:31 ` Manfred Spraul
1999-10-10 21:53 ` Andrea Arcangeli
1999-10-10 22:34 ` Alexander Viro
1999-10-10 23:28 ` Andrea Arcangeli
1999-10-11 15:50 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
1999-10-11 16:05 ` Alexander Viro
1999-10-11 18:02 ` Manfred Spraul
1999-10-11 19:07 ` Kanoj Sarcar
1999-10-11 22:23 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
1999-10-13 1:25 ` Kanoj Sarcar
1999-10-13 7:32 ` Manfred Spraul
1999-10-15 9:58 ` Ralf Baechle
1999-10-15 17:50 ` Kanoj Sarcar [this message]
1999-10-13 10:45 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
1999-10-11 20:15 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
1999-10-11 21:14 ` Manfred Spraul
1999-10-11 21:37 ` Alexander Viro
1999-10-11 22:13 ` Manfred Spraul
1999-10-11 22:22 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
1999-10-11 23:01 ` Alexander Viro
1999-10-12 14:06 ` [more fun] " Alexander Viro
1999-10-13 7:35 ` Manfred Spraul
1999-10-13 18:34 ` Kanoj Sarcar
1999-10-13 10:16 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
1999-10-11 20:13 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
1999-10-11 21:40 ` Alexander Viro
1999-10-11 22:20 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
1999-10-11 22:31 ` Alexander Viro
1999-10-13 10:25 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
1999-10-11 15:47 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
1999-10-11 15:43 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
1999-10-10 16:56 ` Andrea Arcangeli
1999-10-11 15:41 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
1999-10-11 15:52 ` Alexander Viro
1999-10-09 12:48 Manfred Spraul
1999-10-09 13:12 ` Alexander Viro
1999-10-09 13:17 ` Manfred Spraul
1999-10-09 13:38 ` Alexander Viro
1999-10-09 16:01 ` Andrea Arcangeli
1999-10-10 13:05 ` Manfred Spraul
1999-10-11 15:09 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
1999-10-11 15:05 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=199910151750.KAA99441@google.engr.sgi.com \
--to=kanoj@google.engr.sgi.com \
--cc=andrea@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.rutgers.edu \
--cc=linux-mips@fnet.fr \
--cc=linux-mips@vger.rutgers.edu \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com \
--cc=manfreds@colorfullife.com \
--cc=mingo@chiara.csoma.elte.hu \
--cc=ralf@oss.sgi.com \
--cc=sct@redhat.com \
--cc=viro@math.psu.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox