linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: kanoj@google.engr.sgi.com (Kanoj Sarcar)
To: Ralf Baechle <ralf@oss.sgi.com>
Cc: manfreds@colorfullife.com, sct@redhat.com, viro@math.psu.edu,
	andrea@suse.de, linux-kernel@vger.rutgers.edu,
	mingo@chiara.csoma.elte.hu, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com, linux-mips@fnet.fr,
	linux-mips@vger.rutgers.edu
Subject: Re: locking question: do_mmap(), do_munmap()
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 1999 10:50:11 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <199910151750.KAA99441@google.engr.sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <19991015115816.B948@uni-koblenz.de> from "Ralf Baechle" at Oct 15, 99 11:58:16 am

> 
> On Wed, Oct 13, 1999 at 09:32:54AM +0200, Manfred Spraul wrote:
> 
> > Kanoj Sarcar wrote:
> > > Here's a primitive patch showing the direction I am thinking of. I do not
> > > have any problem with a spinning lock, but I coded this against 2.2.10,
> > > where insert_vm_struct could go to sleep, hence I had to use sleeping
> > > locks to protect the vma chain.
> > 
> > I found a few places where I don't know how to change them.
> > 
> > 1) arch/mips/mm/r4xx0.c:
> > their flush_cache_range() function internally calls find_vma().
> > flush_cache_range() is called by proc/mem.c, and it seems that this
> > function cannot get the mmap semaphore.
> > Currently, every caller of flush_cache_range() either owns the kernel
> > lock or the mmap_sem.
> > OTHO, this function contains a race anyway [src_vma can go away if
> > handle_mm_fault() sleeps, src_vma is used at the end of the function.]
> 
> The sole reason for fiddling with the VMA is that we try to optimize
> icache flushing for non-VM_EXEC vmas.  This optimization is broken
> as the MIPS hardware doesn't make a difference between read and execute
> in page permissions, so the icache might be dirty even though the vma
> has no exec permission.  So I'll have to re-implement this whole things
> anyway.  The other problem is an efficience problem.  A call like
> flush_cache_range(some_mm_ptr, 0, TASK_SIZE) would take a minor eternity
> and for MIPS64 a full eternity ...
> 
>   Ralf

Ralf,

Looking in 2.3.21, all the find_vma's in arch/mips/mm/r4xx0.c are used to 
set a flag called "text" which is not used at all. Also, if the find_vma
returns null, the code basically does nothing. So the optimized icache
flushing is probably not implemented yet? Then, the only reason to 
do the flush_vma currently is to check whether the lower level flush 
routine should be called. Without holding some locks, this is always
tricky to do on a third party mm.

Btw, this probably belongs to linux-mips, but what do you mean by saying
the icache might be dirty? Its been a while since I worked on the
older mips chips, but as far as I remember, the icache can not hold 
dirty lines.

Kanoj
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://humbolt.geo.uu.nl/Linux-MM/

  reply	other threads:[~1999-10-15 17:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <Pine.LNX.4.10.9910101713010.364-100000@alpha.random>
1999-10-10 15:52 ` Manfred Spraul
1999-10-10 16:07   ` Alexander Viro
1999-10-10 16:25     ` Alexander Viro
1999-10-10 16:45       ` Manfred Spraul
1999-10-10 17:25         ` Alexander Viro
1999-10-10 17:12       ` Andrea Arcangeli
1999-10-10 17:48         ` Alexander Viro
1999-10-10 18:42           ` Manfred Spraul
1999-10-10 19:03             ` Alexander Viro
1999-10-10 21:31               ` Manfred Spraul
1999-10-10 21:53               ` Andrea Arcangeli
1999-10-10 22:34                 ` Alexander Viro
1999-10-10 23:28                   ` Andrea Arcangeli
1999-10-11 15:50               ` Stephen C. Tweedie
1999-10-11 16:05                 ` Alexander Viro
1999-10-11 18:02                   ` Manfred Spraul
1999-10-11 19:07                     ` Kanoj Sarcar
1999-10-11 22:23                       ` Stephen C. Tweedie
1999-10-13  1:25                         ` Kanoj Sarcar
1999-10-13  7:32                           ` Manfred Spraul
1999-10-15  9:58                             ` Ralf Baechle
1999-10-15 17:50                               ` Kanoj Sarcar [this message]
1999-10-13 10:45                           ` Stephen C. Tweedie
1999-10-11 20:15                     ` Stephen C. Tweedie
1999-10-11 21:14                       ` Manfred Spraul
1999-10-11 21:37                     ` Alexander Viro
1999-10-11 22:13                       ` Manfred Spraul
1999-10-11 22:22                     ` Stephen C. Tweedie
1999-10-11 23:01                       ` Alexander Viro
1999-10-12 14:06                         ` [more fun] " Alexander Viro
1999-10-13  7:35                           ` Manfred Spraul
1999-10-13 18:34                             ` Kanoj Sarcar
1999-10-13 10:16                         ` Stephen C. Tweedie
1999-10-11 20:13                   ` Stephen C. Tweedie
1999-10-11 21:40                     ` Alexander Viro
1999-10-11 22:20                       ` Stephen C. Tweedie
1999-10-11 22:31                         ` Alexander Viro
1999-10-13 10:25                           ` Stephen C. Tweedie
1999-10-11 15:47             ` Stephen C. Tweedie
1999-10-11 15:43         ` Stephen C. Tweedie
1999-10-10 16:56     ` Andrea Arcangeli
1999-10-11 15:41     ` Stephen C. Tweedie
1999-10-11 15:52       ` Alexander Viro
1999-10-09 12:48 Manfred Spraul
1999-10-09 13:12 ` Alexander Viro
1999-10-09 13:17   ` Manfred Spraul
1999-10-09 13:38     ` Alexander Viro
1999-10-09 16:01   ` Andrea Arcangeli
1999-10-10 13:05     ` Manfred Spraul
1999-10-11 15:09       ` Stephen C. Tweedie
1999-10-11 15:05     ` Stephen C. Tweedie

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=199910151750.KAA99441@google.engr.sgi.com \
    --to=kanoj@google.engr.sgi.com \
    --cc=andrea@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.rutgers.edu \
    --cc=linux-mips@fnet.fr \
    --cc=linux-mips@vger.rutgers.edu \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com \
    --cc=manfreds@colorfullife.com \
    --cc=mingo@chiara.csoma.elte.hu \
    --cc=ralf@oss.sgi.com \
    --cc=sct@redhat.com \
    --cc=viro@math.psu.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox