linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: JF Martinez <jfm2@club-internet.fr>
To: neil@nc.com
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: Need ammo against BSD Fud
Date: Sat, 18 Sep 1999 22:22:32 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <199909182022.WAA00850@agnes.faerie.monroyaume> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <37E2FEBB.4ED76BF0@nc.com> (neil@nc.com)

> 
> JF Martinez wrote:
> 
> > BSD people are writing tons of articles saying how superior BSD is
> > respective to Linux.  There is a danger they will impregnate people
> > with the idea: Linux=second rate system.  The Linux people tend to
> > know little about BSD so we are at pain to fire back.  And BSD people
> > tend to "forget" to mention those features Linux had years before BSD
> > like modules or ELF support.  I would really appreciate info about
> > features the Linux kernel has and BSDs haven't or about areas where
> > Linux outperforms BSDs.
> 
> Maybe it does, maybe it doesn't. The best thing to do is end most of
> these silly advocacy wars, and neither 'side' retaliating is the best
> way to do this. As a regular user of many of both systems, the constant
> FUD from everyone and anyone is just pathetically annoying.
> 

One of my fears is that BSD one day becomes the "saviour" of
proprietary software due to the fact BSD licensed software can be
reused legally and without provokinhg a scandal who isbad for PR).  So
one day those attacks could be coordinated by companies wanting people
switching from Linux to BSD and then issue a proprietary BSD with
additional bells and whistles.  First step would be in making people
believe that BSD is superior to Linux

> The more ammo that gets sent, the more the other side will just send
> ammo back again. It's an endless cycle that will never end.
> 

No I don't want to start an "editors war" but I need info in order to
restablish truth: I fear co,nsequences of one sided propaganda.  I
catched the BSD people in a couple of occasions while lying by
omission.

I think BSD is probably suprior in some fields but I can't beleieve
there is nothing wheere Linux doesn't beat the pants of BSD.  There is
alw that nothing is superior in every field.

-- 
			Jean Francois Martinez

Project Independence: Linux for the Masses
http://www.independence.seul.org

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://humbolt.geo.uu.nl/Linux-MM/

  reply	other threads:[~1999-09-18 20:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
1999-09-17 21:59 JF Martinez
1999-09-18  2:53 ` Neil A. Carson
1999-09-18 20:22   ` JF Martinez [this message]
1999-09-18 11:57 ` Ralf Baechle
1999-09-19 12:29 ` Rik van Riel
1999-09-19 15:13   ` James Simmons
1999-09-21 20:53   ` SV: " Hans Eric Sandström 
1999-09-25 14:27     ` Andrea Arcangeli
1999-09-25 16:28       ` James Simmons
1999-09-25 19:05         ` David Mentr'e

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=199909182022.WAA00850@agnes.faerie.monroyaume \
    --to=jfm2@club-internet.fr \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=neil@nc.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox