From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lappi.waldorf-gmbh.de (cacc-18.uni-koblenz.de [141.26.131.18]) by mailhost.uni-koblenz.de (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id TAA02369 for ; Sat, 18 Sep 1999 19:02:52 +0200 (MET DST) Date: Sat, 18 Sep 1999 13:57:55 +0200 From: Ralf Baechle Subject: Re: Need ammo against BSD Fud Message-ID: <19990918135755.B12208@uni-koblenz.de> References: <199909172159.XAA01101@agnes.faerie.monroyaume> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <199909172159.XAA01101@agnes.faerie.monroyaume>; from JF Martinez on Fri, Sep 17, 1999 at 11:59:21PM +0200 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: JF Martinez Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: On Fri, Sep 17, 1999 at 11:59:21PM +0200, JF Martinez wrote: > BSD people are writing tons of articles saying how superior BSD is > respective to Linux. There is a danger they will impregnate people > with the idea: Linux=second rate system. The Linux people tend to > know little about BSD so we are at pain to fire back. And BSD people > tend to "forget" to mention those features Linux had years before BSD > like modules or ELF support. I would really appreciate info about > features the Linux kernel has and BSDs haven't or about areas where > Linux outperforms BSDs. Ignore them. Saves alot of nerves. The Linux market is so explosive that BSD is already more or less meaningless and it will become even more meaningless in the future. This is not about technical arguments. Ralf -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://humbolt.geo.uu.nl/Linux-MM/