linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: kanoj@google.engr.sgi.com (Kanoj Sarcar)
To: "Stephen C. Tweedie" <sct@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, torvalds@transmeta.com, andrea@suse.de
Subject: Re: [RFC] [RFT] [PATCH] kanoj-mm9-2.2.10 simplify swapcache/shm code interaction
Date: Mon, 21 Jun 1999 10:17:10 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <199906211717.KAA67065@google.engr.sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <14190.16136.552955.557245@dukat.scot.redhat.com> from "Stephen C. Tweedie" at Jun 21, 99 02:32:56 pm

> 
> Hi,
> 
> On Sat, 19 Jun 1999 16:14:26 -0700 (PDT), kanoj@google.engr.sgi.com
> (Kanoj Sarcar) said:
> 
> > There is no reason for shared memory pages to have to be marked
> > PG_swap_cache to fool the underlying swap io routines. 
> 
> That code was never intended to "fool" anyone: the swap IO code is able
> to do read/write swap even in the absense of swap cache entries for the
> page.  Only recently have we forced all swap to go through the swap
> cache, but the IO routines are still capable of doing it both ways.
> 
> > -	if (PageSwapCache(page)) {
> > +	if (!shmfs) {
> >  		/* Make sure we are the only process doing I/O with this swap page. */
> >  		while (test_and_set_bit(offset,p->swap_lockmap)) {
> >  			run_task_queue(&tq_disk);
> 
> This looks wrong, conceptually.  I'd prefer to see us do the locking any
> time the page happens to have an appropriate swap lock map bit.
> PageSwapCache() is the right test in this case: the rw_swap_page stuff
> shouldn't care about whether it is shmfs calling it or not.  It should
> just care about doing the swap cache locking correctly if that happens
> to be required.
> 
> --Stephen
> 

Okay, wrong choice of name on the parameter "shmfs". Would it help
to think of the new last parameter to rw_swap_page_base as "dolock",
which the caller has to pass in to indicate whether there is a 
swap lock map bit?

I am reposting the patch with this change, specially since there
is a page reference count problem on the original patch.

Thanks.

Kanoj
kanoj@engr.sgi.com



--- mm/page_io.old	Mon Jun  7 13:49:17 1999
+++ mm/page_io.c	Mon Jun 21 09:09:33 1999
@@ -35,7 +35,7 @@
  * that shared pages stay shared while being swapped.
  */
 
-static void rw_swap_page_base(int rw, unsigned long entry, struct page *page, int wait)
+static void rw_swap_page_base(int rw, unsigned long entry, struct page *page, int wait, int dolock)
 {
 	unsigned long type, offset;
 	struct swap_info_struct * p;
@@ -84,7 +84,7 @@
 		return;
 	}
 
-	if (PageSwapCache(page)) {
+	if (dolock) {
 		/* Make sure we are the only process doing I/O with this swap page. */
 		while (test_and_set_bit(offset,p->swap_lockmap)) {
 			run_task_queue(&tq_disk);
@@ -162,7 +162,7 @@
 		/* Do some cleaning up so if this ever happens we can hopefully
 		 * trigger controlled shutdown.
 		 */
-		if (PageSwapCache(page)) {
+		if (dolock) {
 			if (!test_and_clear_bit(offset,p->swap_lockmap))
 				printk("swap_after_unlock_page: lock already cleared\n");
 			wake_up(&lock_queue);
@@ -174,7 +174,7 @@
  		set_bit(PG_decr_after, &page->flags);
  		atomic_inc(&nr_async_pages);
  	}
- 	if (PageSwapCache(page)) {
+ 	if (dolock) {
  		/* only lock/unlock swap cache pages! */
  		set_bit(PG_swap_unlock_after, &page->flags);
  	}
@@ -256,7 +256,7 @@
 		printk ("swap entry mismatch");
 		return;
 	}
-	rw_swap_page_base(rw, entry, page, wait);
+	rw_swap_page_base(rw, entry, page, wait, 1);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -270,7 +270,7 @@
 	page = mem_map + MAP_NR((unsigned long) buffer);
 	wait_on_page(page);
 	set_bit(PG_locked, &page->flags);
-	if (test_and_set_bit(PG_swap_cache, &page->flags)) {
+	if (test_bit(PG_swap_cache, &page->flags)) {
 		printk ("VM: read_swap_page: page already in swap cache!\n");
 		return;
 	}
@@ -278,13 +278,8 @@
 		printk ("VM: read_swap_page: page already in page cache!\n");
 		return;
 	}
-	page->inode = &swapper_inode;
 	page->offset = entry;
-	atomic_inc(&page->count);	/* Protect from shrink_mmap() */
-	rw_swap_page(rw, entry, buffer, 1);
-	atomic_dec(&page->count);
-	page->inode = 0;
-	clear_bit(PG_swap_cache, &page->flags);
+	rw_swap_page_base(rw, entry, page, 1, 1);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -305,5 +300,5 @@
 		printk ("VM: rw_swap_page_nolock: page in swap cache!\n");
 		return;
 	}
-	rw_swap_page_base(rw, entry, page, wait);
+	rw_swap_page_base(rw, entry, page, wait, 0);
 }
--- /usr/tmp/p_rdiff_a005UY/swap.h	Sat Jun 19 16:05:33 1999
+++ include/linux/swap.h	Sat Jun 19 15:05:43 1999
@@ -144,13 +144,6 @@
 extern unsigned long swap_cache_find_success;
 #endif
 
-extern inline unsigned long in_swap_cache(struct page *page)
-{
-	if (PageSwapCache(page))
-		return page->offset;
-	return 0;
-}
-
 /*
  * Work out if there are any other processes sharing this page, ignoring
  * any page reference coming from the swap cache, or from outstanding
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://humbolt.geo.uu.nl/Linux-MM/

  reply	other threads:[~1999-06-21 17:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
1999-06-19 23:14 Kanoj Sarcar
1999-06-21 13:32 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
1999-06-21 17:17   ` Kanoj Sarcar [this message]
1999-06-21 17:51     ` Stephen C. Tweedie
1999-06-21 18:31       ` Andrea Arcangeli
1999-06-21 19:12         ` [RFC] [RFT] [PATCH] kanoj-mm9-2.2.10 simplify swapcache/shm code Kanoj Sarcar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=199906211717.KAA67065@google.engr.sgi.com \
    --to=kanoj@google.engr.sgi.com \
    --cc=andrea@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=sct@redhat.com \
    --cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox