From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from dax.scot.redhat.com (sct@dax.scot.redhat.com [195.89.149.242]) by kvack.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id MAA18272 for ; Wed, 13 Jan 1999 12:48:41 -0500 Date: Wed, 13 Jan 1999 17:48:13 GMT Message-Id: <199901131748.RAA06406@dax.scot.redhat.com> From: "Stephen C. Tweedie" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: MM deadlock [was: Re: arca-vm-8...] In-Reply-To: References: <87d84kl49u.fsf@atlas.CARNet.hr> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: Andrea Arcangeli Cc: Zlatko Calusic , Linus Torvalds , "Stephen C. Tweedie" , "Eric W. Biederman" , Savochkin Andrey Vladimirovich , steve@netplus.net, brent verner , "Garst R. Reese" , Kalle Andersson , Ben McCann , Alan Cox , bredelin@ucsd.edu, linux-kernel@vger.rutgers.edu, Rik van Riel , linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: Hi, On Tue, 12 Jan 1999 20:05:21 +0100 (CET), Andrea Arcangeli said: > On 12 Jan 1999, Zlatko Calusic wrote: >> Could somebody spare a minute to explain why is that so, and what >> needs to be done to make SHM swapping asynchronous? > Maybe because nobody care about shm? I think shm can wait for 2.3 to be > improved. "Nobody"? Oracle uses large shared memory regions for starters. --Stephen -- This is a majordomo managed list. To unsubscribe, send a message with the body 'unsubscribe linux-mm me@address' to: majordomo@kvack.org