From: "Stephen C. Tweedie" <sct@redhat.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>
Cc: "Stephen C. Tweedie" <sct@redhat.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@e-mind.com>,
Rik van Riel <H.H.vanRiel@phys.uu.nl>,
Linux MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Alan Cox <number6@the-village.bc.nu>
Subject: Re: New patch (was Re: [PATCH] swapin readahead v3 + kswapd fixes)
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 1998 18:59:05 GMT [thread overview]
Message-ID: <199812211859.SAA02961@dax.scot.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.95.981221095438.6187B-100000@penguin.transmeta.com>
Hi,
On Mon, 21 Dec 1998 09:58:10 -0800 (PST), Linus Torvalds
<torvalds@transmeta.com> said:
> I'm testing it now - the problem is probably just due to my mixing up the
> pre-2 and pre-3 patches, and pre-3 got the "timid" memory freeing
> parameters even though the whole point of the pre-3 approach is that it
> isn't needed any more.
Yep, and although things did improve when I restored some of that
aggressiveness (initial priority = 6 again), it was still mondo slow
on 8MB. I also restored the swapout loop (so that the foreground
try_to_free_page() takes a swap cluster argument again, rather than
always freeing just one page at a time); still no improvement (which
actually surprised me --- I guess that kswapd is doing clustering for
swapout well enough on its own).
>> You simply CANNOT tell from looking at the code that it "will
>> work well for everybody out there on every hardware".
> Agreed.
> However, I very much believe that tweaking comes _after_ the basic
> arhictecture is right.
Right.
> As such, your "current != kswapd" tweak gave a whopping good hint about
> what the architecture _should_ be. And we'll be zeroing in on something
> that has both the performance and the architecture right.
Sure: I think we can agree that the most important principle in this
respect is that the foreground and background swapping tasks may be
similar but they do not _need_ to be the same, and they may well have
different requirements.
Linus, would it help at all if I just sat down and recoded the VM I'm
running now in a manner which makes the design obvious? In other
words, clearly separate out the foreground and background paths as you
have done, with the "current != kswapd" test removed and the
foreground-specific code in its own, identifiable code path, but
preserving the actual algorithm?
--Stephen
--
This is a majordomo managed list. To unsubscribe, send a message with
the body 'unsubscribe linux-mm me@address' to: majordomo@kvack.org
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1998-12-21 18:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1998-12-01 6:55 [PATCH] swapin readahead v3 + kswapd fixes Rik van Riel
1998-12-01 8:15 ` Andrea Arcangeli
1998-12-01 15:28 ` Rik van Riel
1998-12-17 1:24 ` Linus Torvalds
1998-12-19 17:09 ` New patch (was Re: [PATCH] swapin readahead v3 + kswapd fixes) Stephen C. Tweedie
1998-12-19 18:41 ` Linus Torvalds
1998-12-19 19:41 ` Linus Torvalds
1998-12-19 22:01 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
1998-12-20 3:05 ` Linus Torvalds
1998-12-20 14:18 ` Linus Torvalds
1998-12-21 13:03 ` Andrea Arcangeli
1998-12-21 13:39 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
1998-12-21 14:08 ` Andrea Arcangeli
1998-12-21 16:42 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
1998-12-21 9:53 ` Andrea Arcangeli
1998-12-21 16:37 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
1998-12-21 17:58 ` Linus Torvalds
1998-12-21 18:59 ` Stephen C. Tweedie [this message]
1998-12-21 19:38 ` Linus Torvalds
1998-12-22 7:56 ` Eric W. Biederman
1998-12-22 10:49 ` Andrea Arcangeli
1998-12-22 15:32 ` Eric W. Biederman
1998-12-22 15:40 ` Andrea Arcangeli
1998-12-22 16:26 ` Linus Torvalds
1998-12-22 19:55 ` Eric W. Biederman
1998-12-22 20:25 ` Rik van Riel
1998-12-22 21:56 ` Linus Torvalds
1998-12-22 20:10 ` Rik van Riel
1998-12-22 22:35 ` Andrea Arcangeli
1998-12-23 8:45 ` Rik van Riel
1998-12-22 20:03 ` Rik van Riel
1998-12-22 17:23 ` [patch] swap_out now really free (the right) pages [Re: New patch (was Re: [PATCH] swapin readahead v3 + kswapd fixes)] Andrea Arcangeli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=199812211859.SAA02961@dax.scot.redhat.com \
--to=sct@redhat.com \
--cc=H.H.vanRiel@phys.uu.nl \
--cc=andrea@e-mind.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=number6@the-village.bc.nu \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox