From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from dax.scot.redhat.com (sct@dax.scot.redhat.com [195.89.149.242]) by kvack.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id LAA23888 for ; Mon, 21 Dec 1998 11:39:12 -0500 Date: Mon, 21 Dec 1998 16:37:47 GMT Message-Id: <199812211637.QAA02759@dax.scot.redhat.com> From: "Stephen C. Tweedie" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: New patch (was Re: [PATCH] swapin readahead v3 + kswapd fixes) In-Reply-To: References: <199812191709.RAA01245@dax.scot.redhat.com> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: Andrea Arcangeli Cc: "Stephen C. Tweedie" , Linus Torvalds , Rik van Riel , Linux MM , Alan Cox List-ID: Hi, On Mon, 21 Dec 1998 10:53:35 +0100 (CET), Andrea Arcangeli said: > The good point of 132-pre2 is that you' ll never see a thread on linux > kernel that will say "132-pre2 VM performance jerky". I haven't seen that for the current ac patches, either. > It could be not the best but sure will work well for everybody out > there on every hardware. Of course, you've tested this, haven't you? pre2 works OK on low memory for me but its performance on 64MB sucks here. pre3 works fine on 64MB but its performance on 8MB sucks even more. You simply CANNOT tell from looking at the code that it "will work well for everybody out there on every hardware". --Stephen -- This is a majordomo managed list. To unsubscribe, send a message with the body 'unsubscribe linux-mm me@address' to: majordomo@kvack.org