From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Lance Yang <ioworker0@gmail.com>
Cc: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>,
willy@infradead.org, sj@kernel.org, maskray@google.com,
ziy@nvidia.com, ryan.roberts@arm.com, 21cnbao@gmail.com,
mhocko@suse.com, fengwei.yin@intel.com, zokeefe@google.com,
shy828301@gmail.com, xiehuan09@gmail.com, libang.li@antgroup.com,
wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com, songmuchun@bytedance.com,
peterx@redhat.com, minchan@kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] mm/rmap: integrate PMD-mapped folio splitting into pagewalk loop
Date: Tue, 7 May 2024 19:33:05 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <19645506-f17d-4202-807e-f0e5c99af742@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240507102241.0a09db69afd62efb5ce84f17@linux-foundation.org>
On 07.05.24 19:22, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 7 May 2024 16:38:07 +0800 Lance Yang <ioworker0@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>>> Yep, I'll also set pvmw.ptl to NULL here if any corner cases arise.
>>>>
>>>
>>> This series already resides in mm-stable. I asked Andrew to remove it
>>> for now. If that doesn't work, we'll need fixup patches to address any
>>> review feedback.
>>
>> I'll patiently wait Andrew's response, and then submit the next version or
>> fixup patches accordingly.
>
> Well, which series are we talking about? "mm/madvise: enhance
> lazyfreeing with mTHP in madvise_free v10" or ""Reclaim lazyfree THP
> without splitting v4" or both?
See my other mail, "mm/madvise: enhance lazyfreeing with mTHP in
madvise_free v10" is all acked/reviewed and good to go.
>
> And how significant are the needed fixup patches?
>
> And what is our confidence level after those fixups are in place?
I'm afraid I won't have time to review this series this/next week, so I
cannot tell. I already assumed this would not be 6.10 material.
--
Cheers,
David / dhildenb
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-07 17:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-01 4:26 [PATCH v4 0/3] Reclaim lazyfree THP without splitting Lance Yang
2024-05-01 4:26 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] mm/rmap: remove duplicated exit code in pagewalk loop Lance Yang
2024-05-07 14:51 ` Zi Yan
2024-05-07 14:53 ` Lance Yang
2024-05-01 4:26 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] mm/rmap: integrate PMD-mapped folio splitting into " Lance Yang
2024-05-07 3:40 ` Baolin Wang
2024-05-07 4:37 ` Lance Yang
2024-05-07 8:17 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-05-07 8:38 ` Lance Yang
2024-05-07 17:22 ` Andrew Morton
2024-05-07 17:33 ` David Hildenbrand [this message]
2024-05-07 17:38 ` Andrew Morton
2024-05-07 18:30 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-05-07 15:26 ` Zi Yan
2024-05-08 5:43 ` Lance Yang
2024-05-08 14:07 ` Zi Yan
2024-05-08 14:35 ` Lance Yang
2024-05-08 14:48 ` Zi Yan
2024-05-08 14:56 ` Zi Yan
2024-05-08 15:52 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-05-08 16:22 ` Zi Yan
2024-05-08 16:35 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-05-09 8:21 ` Lance Yang
2024-05-09 14:53 ` Zi Yan
2024-05-09 8:56 ` Lance Yang
2024-05-01 4:27 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] mm/vmscan: avoid split lazyfree THP during shrink_folio_list() Lance Yang
2024-05-07 4:00 ` Baolin Wang
2024-05-07 6:32 ` Lance Yang
2024-05-07 8:26 ` Lance Yang
2024-05-07 9:33 ` Baolin Wang
2024-05-07 11:37 ` Lance Yang
2024-05-09 9:36 ` Baolin Wang
2024-05-09 12:17 ` Lance Yang
2024-05-07 16:20 ` Zi Yan
2024-05-08 5:14 ` Lance Yang
2024-05-01 16:08 ` [PATCH v4 0/3] Reclaim lazyfree THP without splitting SeongJae Park
2024-05-02 0:30 ` Lance Yang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=19645506-f17d-4202-807e-f0e5c99af742@redhat.com \
--to=david@redhat.com \
--cc=21cnbao@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=fengwei.yin@intel.com \
--cc=ioworker0@gmail.com \
--cc=libang.li@antgroup.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=maskray@google.com \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=minchan@kernel.org \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=shy828301@gmail.com \
--cc=sj@kernel.org \
--cc=songmuchun@bytedance.com \
--cc=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=xiehuan09@gmail.com \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
--cc=zokeefe@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox