linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org,
	Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@linux.intel.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>,
	Arun KS <arunks@codeaurora.org>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
	Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@c-s.fr>,
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
	Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@de.ibm.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>,
	Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Jun Yao <yaojun8558363@gmail.com>,
	Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>,
	"Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@infradead.org>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
	Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>,
	Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>,
	Pavel Tatashin <pavel.tatashin@microsoft.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>, Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw>,
	Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>,
	Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	Steve Capper <steve.capper@arm.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
	Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
	Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>,
	Wei Yang <richardw.yang@linux.intel.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>,
	Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] mm/memory_hotplug: Consider all zones when removing memory
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2019 17:43:47 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <194da076-364e-267d-0d51-64940925e2e4@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87pnksm0zx.fsf@linux.ibm.com>

On 26.08.19 16:53, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> writes:
> 
>> Working on virtio-mem, I was able to trigger a kernel BUG (with debug
>> options enabled) when removing memory that was never onlined. I was able
>> to reproduce with DIMMs. As far as I can see the same can also happen
>> without debug configs enabled, if we're unlucky and the uninitialized
>> memmap contains selected garbage .
>>
>> The root problem is that we should not try to derive the zone of memory we
>> are removing from the first PFN. The individual memory blocks of a DIMM
>> could be spanned by different ZONEs, multiple ZONES (after being offline and
>> re-onlined) or no ZONE at all (never onlined).
>>
>> Let's process all applicable zones when removing memory so we're on the
>> safe side. In the long term, we want to resize the zones when offlining
>> memory (and before removing ZONE_DEVICE memory), however, that will require
>> more thought (and most probably a new SECTION_ACTIVE / pfn_active()
>> thingy). More details about that in patch #3.
>>
>> Along with the fix, some related cleanups.
>>
>> v1 -> v2:
>> - Include "mm: Introduce for_each_zone_nid()"
>> - "mm/memory_hotplug: Pass nid instead of zone to __remove_pages()"
>> -- Pass the nid instead of the zone and use it to reduce the number of
>>    zones to process
>>
>> --- snip ---
>>
>> I gave this a quick test with a DIMM on x86-64:
>>
>> Start with a NUMA-less node 1. Hotplug a DIMM (512MB) to Node 1.
>> 1st memory block is not onlined. 2nd and 4th is onlined MOVABLE.
>> 3rd is onlined NORMAL.
>>
>> :/# echo "online_movable" > /sys/devices/system/memory/memory41/state
>> [...]
>> :/# echo "online_movable" > /sys/devices/system/memory/memory43/state
>> :/# echo "online_kernel" > /sys/devices/system/memory/memory42/state
>> :/# cat /sys/devices/system/memory/memory40/state
>> offline
>>
>> :/# cat /proc/zoneinfo
>> Node 1, zone   Normal
>>  [...]
>>         spanned  32768
>>         present  32768
>>         managed  32768
>>  [...]
>> Node 1, zone  Movable
>>  [...]
>>         spanned  98304
>>         present  65536
>>         managed  65536
>>  [...]
>>
>> Trigger hotunplug. If it succeeds (block 42 can be offlined):
>>
>> :/# cat /proc/zoneinfo
>>
>> Node 1, zone   Normal
>>   pages free     0
>>         min      0
>>         low      0
>>         high     0
>>         spanned  0
>>         present  0
>>         managed  0
>>         protection: (0, 0, 0, 0, 0)
>> Node 1, zone  Movable
>>   pages free     0
>>         min      0
>>         low      0
>>         high     0
>>         spanned  0
>>         present  0
>>         managed  0
>>         protection: (0, 0, 0, 0, 0)
>>
>> So all zones were properly fixed up and we don't access the memmap of the
>> first, never-onlined memory block (garbage). I am no longer able to trigger
>> the BUG. I did a similar test with an already populated node.
>>
> 
> I did report a variant of the issue at
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20190514025354.9108-1-aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com/
> 
> This patch series still doesn't handle the fact that struct page backing
> the start_pfn might not be initialized. ie, it results in crash like
> below

Okay, that's a related but different issue I think.

I can see that current shrink_zone_span() might read-access the
uninitialized struct page of a PFN if

1. The zone has holes and we check for "zone all holes". If we get
pfn_valid(pfn), we check if "page_zone(pfn_to_page(pfn)) != zone".

2. Via find_smallest_section_pfn() / find_biggest_section_pfn() find a
spanned pfn_valid(). We check
- pfn_to_nid(start_pfn) != nid
- zone != page_zone(pfn_to_page(start_pfn)

So we don't actually use the zone/nid, only use it to sanity check. That
might result in false-positives (not that bad).

It all boils down to shrink_zone_span() not working only on active
memory, for which the PFN is not only valid but also initialized
(something for which we need a new section flag I assume).

Which access triggers the issue you describe? pfn_to_nid()?

> 
>     pc: c0000000004bc1ec: shrink_zone_span+0x1bc/0x290
>     lr: c0000000004bc1e8: shrink_zone_span+0x1b8/0x290
>     sp: c0000000dac7f910
>    msr: 800000000282b033
>   current = 0xc0000000da2fa000
>   paca    = 0xc00000000fffb300   irqmask: 0x03   irq_happened: 0x01
>     pid   = 1224, comm = ndctl
> kernel BUG at /home/kvaneesh/src/linux/include/linux/mm.h:1088!
> Linux version 5.3.0-rc6-17495-gc7727d815970-dirty (kvaneesh@ltc-boston123) (gcc version 7.4.0 (Ubuntu 7.4.0-1ubuntu1~18.04.1)) #183 SMP Mon Aug 26 09:37:32 CDT 2019
> enter ? for help

Which exact kernel BUG are you hitting here? (my tree doesn't seem t
have any BUG statement around  include/linux/mm.h:1088)

> [c0000000dac7f980] c0000000004bc574 __remove_zone+0x84/0xd0
> [c0000000dac7f9d0] c0000000004bc920 __remove_section+0x100/0x170
> [c0000000dac7fa30] c0000000004bec98 __remove_pages+0x168/0x220
> [c0000000dac7fa90] c00000000007dff8 arch_remove_memory+0x38/0x110
> [c0000000dac7fb00] c00000000050cb0c devm_memremap_pages_release+0x24c/0x2f0
> [c0000000dac7fb90] c000000000cfec00 devm_action_release+0x30/0x50
> [c0000000dac7fbb0] c000000000cffe7c release_nodes+0x24c/0x2c0
> [c0000000dac7fc20] c000000000cf8988 device_release_driver_internal+0x168/0x230
> [c0000000dac7fc60] c000000000cf5624 unbind_store+0x74/0x190
> [c0000000dac7fcb0] c000000000cf42a4 drv_attr_store+0x44/0x60
> [c0000000dac7fcd0] c000000000617d44 sysfs_kf_write+0x74/0xa0


-- 

Thanks,

David / dhildenb


  reply	other threads:[~2019-08-26 15:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-08-26 10:10 David Hildenbrand
2019-08-26 10:10 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] mm/memory_hotplug: Exit early in __remove_pages() on BUGs David Hildenbrand
2019-08-26 10:10 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] mm: Exit early in set_zone_contiguous() if already contiguous David Hildenbrand
2019-08-26 10:10 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] mm/memory_hotplug: Process all zones when removing memory David Hildenbrand
2019-08-29 15:39   ` Michal Hocko
2019-08-29 15:54     ` David Hildenbrand
2019-08-29 16:27       ` Michal Hocko
2019-08-29 16:59         ` David Hildenbrand
2019-08-30  6:01           ` Michal Hocko
2019-08-30  6:20             ` David Hildenbrand
2019-08-30  6:47               ` Michal Hocko
2019-08-30  7:07                 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-08-30  8:31                   ` Michal Hocko
2019-08-26 10:10 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] mm/memory_hotplug: Cleanup __remove_pages() David Hildenbrand
2019-08-26 10:10 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] mm: Introduce for_each_zone_nid() David Hildenbrand
2019-08-26 10:10 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] mm/memory_hotplug: Pass nid instead of zone to __remove_pages() David Hildenbrand
2019-08-27 10:49   ` Robin Murphy
2019-08-26 14:53 ` [PATCH v2 0/6] mm/memory_hotplug: Consider all zones when removing memory Aneesh Kumar K.V
2019-08-26 15:43   ` David Hildenbrand [this message]
2019-08-26 16:01     ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2019-08-26 16:20       ` David Hildenbrand
2019-08-26 16:44         ` David Hildenbrand
2019-08-27  5:46           ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2019-08-27  7:06             ` David Hildenbrand
2019-08-28  9:33             ` David Hildenbrand
2019-08-29  8:38   ` Michal Hocko
2019-08-29 11:55     ` David Hildenbrand
2019-08-29 12:20       ` Michal Hocko
2019-08-29  8:36 ` Michal Hocko
2019-08-29 11:39   ` David Hildenbrand

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=194da076-364e-267d-0d51-64940925e2e4@redhat.com \
    --to=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=alexander.h.duyck@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
    --cc=arunks@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=cai@lca.pw \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=christophe.leroy@c-s.fr \
    --cc=dalias@libc.org \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
    --cc=gerald.schaefer@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
    --cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=logang@deltatee.com \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=osalvador@suse.de \
    --cc=pasha.tatashin@soleen.com \
    --cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=pavel.tatashin@microsoft.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=richard.weiyang@gmail.com \
    --cc=richardw.yang@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=rppt@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=steve.capper@arm.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    --cc=yamada.masahiro@socionext.com \
    --cc=yaojun8558363@gmail.com \
    --cc=ysato@users.sourceforge.jp \
    --cc=yuzhao@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox