From: Jan Stancek <jstancek@redhat.com>
To: Yang Shi <yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: kirill@shutemov.name, willy@infradead.org,
kirill shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
vbabka@suse.cz, Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>,
Jan Stancek <jstancek@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [bug] aarch64: userspace stalls on page fault after dd2283f2605e ("mm: mmap: zap pages with read mmap_sem in munmap")
Date: Mon, 6 May 2019 17:35:48 -0400 (EDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1928544225.21255545.1557178548494.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a9d5efea-6088-67c5-8711-f0657a852813@linux.alibaba.com>
----- Original Message -----
>
>
> On 5/5/19 7:10 AM, Jan Stancek wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm seeing userspace program getting stuck on aarch64, on kernels 4.20 and
> > newer.
> > It stalls from seconds to hours.
> >
> > I have simplified it to following scenario (reproducer linked below [1]):
> > while (1):
> > spawn Thread 1: mmap, write, munmap
> > spawn Thread 2: <nothing>
> >
> > Thread 1 is sporadically getting stuck on write to mapped area. User-space
> > is not
> > moving forward - stdout output stops. Observed CPU usage is however 100%.
> >
> > At this time, kernel appears to be busy handling page faults (~700k per
> > second):
> >
> > # perf top -a -g
> > - 98.97% 8.30% a.out [.] map_write_unmap
> > - 23.52% map_write_unmap
> > - 24.29% el0_sync
> > - 10.42% do_mem_abort
> > - 17.81% do_translation_fault
> > - 33.01% do_page_fault
> > - 56.18% handle_mm_fault
> > 40.26% __handle_mm_fault
> > 2.19% __ll_sc___cmpxchg_case_acq_4
> > 0.87% mem_cgroup_from_task
> > - 6.18% find_vma
> > 5.38% vmacache_find
> > 1.35% __ll_sc___cmpxchg_case_acq_8
> > 1.23% __ll_sc_atomic64_sub_return_release
> > 0.78% down_read_trylock
> > 0.93% do_translation_fault
> > + 8.30% thread_start
> >
> > # perf stat -p 8189 -d
> > ^C
> > Performance counter stats for process id '8189':
> >
> > 984.311350 task-clock (msec) # 1.000 CPUs utilized
> > 0 context-switches # 0.000 K/sec
> > 0 cpu-migrations # 0.000 K/sec
> > 723,641 page-faults # 0.735 M/sec
> > 2,559,199,434 cycles # 2.600 GHz
> > 711,933,112 instructions # 0.28 insn per
> > cycle
> > <not supported> branches
> > 757,658 branch-misses
> > 205,840,557 L1-dcache-loads # 209.121 M/sec
> > 40,561,529 L1-dcache-load-misses # 19.71% of all
> > L1-dcache hits
> > <not supported> LLC-loads
> > <not supported> LLC-load-misses
> >
> > 0.984454892 seconds time elapsed
> >
> > With some extra traces, it appears looping in page fault for same address,
> > over and over:
> > do_page_fault // mm_flags: 0x55
> > __do_page_fault
> > __handle_mm_fault
> > handle_pte_fault
> > ptep_set_access_flags
> > if (pte_same(pte, entry)) // pte: e8000805060f53, entry:
> > e8000805060f53
> >
> > I had traces in mmap() and munmap() as well, they don't get hit when
> > reproducer
> > hits the bad state.
> >
> > Notes:
> > - I'm not able to reproduce this on x86.
> > - Attaching GDB or strace immediatelly recovers application from stall.
> > - It also seems to recover faster when system is busy with other tasks.
> > - MAP_SHARED vs. MAP_PRIVATE makes no difference.
> > - Turning off THP makes no difference.
> > - Reproducer [1] usually hits it within ~minute on HW described below.
> > - Longman mentioned that "When the rwsem becomes reader-owned, it causes
> > all the spinning writers to go to sleep adding wakeup latency to
> > the time required to finish the critical sections", but this looks
> > like busy loop, so I'm not sure if it's related to rwsem issues
> > identified
> > in:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190428212557.13482-2-longman@redhat.com/
>
> It sounds possible to me. What the optimization done by the commit ("mm:
> mmap: zap pages with read mmap_sem in munmap") is to downgrade write
> rwsem to read when zapping pages and page table in munmap() after the
> vmas have been detached from the rbtree.
>
> So the mmap(), which is writer, in your test may steal the lock and
> execute with the munmap(), which is the reader after the downgrade, in
> parallel to break the mutual exclusion.
>
> In this case, the parallel mmap() may map to the same area since vmas
> have been detached by munmap(), then mmap() may create the complete same
> vmas, and page fault happens on the same vma at the same address.
>
> I'm not sure why gdb or strace could recover this, but they use ptrace
> which may acquire mmap_sem to break the parallel inadvertently.
>
> May you please try Waiman's patch to see if it makes any difference?
I don't see any difference in behaviour after applying:
[PATCH-tip v7 01/20] locking/rwsem: Prevent decrement of reader count before increment
Issue is still easily reproducible for me.
I'm including output of mem_abort_decode() / show_pte() for sample PTE, that
I see in page fault loop. (I went through all bits, but couldn't find anything invalid about it)
mem_abort_decode: Mem abort info:
mem_abort_decode: ESR = 0x92000047
mem_abort_decode: Exception class = DABT (lower EL), IL = 32 bits
mem_abort_decode: SET = 0, FnV = 0
mem_abort_decode: EA = 0, S1PTW = 0
mem_abort_decode: Data abort info:
mem_abort_decode: ISV = 0, ISS = 0x00000047
mem_abort_decode: CM = 0, WnR = 1
show_pte: user pgtable: 64k pages, 48-bit VAs, pgdp = 0000000067027567
show_pte: [0000ffff6dff0000] pgd=000000176bae0003
show_pte: , pud=000000176bae0003
show_pte: , pmd=000000174ad60003
show_pte: , pte=00e80008023a0f53
show_pte: , pte_pfn: 8023a
>>> print bin(0x47)
0b1000111
Per D12-2779 (ARM Architecture Reference Manual),
ISS encoding for an exception from an Instruction Abort:
IFSC, bits [5:0], Instruction Fault Status Code
0b000111 Translation fault, level 3
---
My theory is that TLB is getting broken.
I made a dummy kernel module that exports debugfs file, which on read triggers:
flush_tlb_all();
Any time reproducer stalls and I read debugfs file, it recovers
immediately and resumes printing to stdout.
>
> > - I tried 2 different aarch64 systems so far: APM X-Gene CPU Potenza A3 and
> > Qualcomm 65-LA-115-151.
> > I can reproduce it on both with v5.1-rc7. It's easier to reproduce
> > on latter one (for longer periods of time), which has 46 CPUs.
> > - Sample output of reproducer on otherwise idle system:
> > # ./a.out
> > [00000314] map_write_unmap took: 26305 ms
> > [00000867] map_write_unmap took: 13642 ms
> > [00002200] map_write_unmap took: 44237 ms
> > [00002851] map_write_unmap took: 992 ms
> > [00004725] map_write_unmap took: 542 ms
> > [00006443] map_write_unmap took: 5333 ms
> > [00006593] map_write_unmap took: 21162 ms
> > [00007435] map_write_unmap took: 16982 ms
> > [00007488] map_write unmap took: 13 ms^C
> >
> > I ran a bisect, which identified following commit as first bad one:
> > dd2283f2605e ("mm: mmap: zap pages with read mmap_sem in munmap")
> >
> > I can also make the issue go away with following change:
> > diff --git a/mm/mmap.c b/mm/mmap.c
> > index 330f12c17fa1..13ce465740e2 100644
> > --- a/mm/mmap.c
> > +++ b/mm/mmap.c
> > @@ -2844,7 +2844,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(vm_munmap);
> > SYSCALL_DEFINE2(munmap, unsigned long, addr, size_t, len)
> > {
> > profile_munmap(addr);
> > - return __vm_munmap(addr, len, true);
> > + return __vm_munmap(addr, len, false);
> > }
> >
> > # cat /proc/cpuinfo | head
> > processor : 0
> > BogoMIPS : 40.00
> > Features : fp asimd evtstrm aes pmull sha1 sha2 crc32 cpuid asimdrdm
> > CPU implementer : 0x51
> > CPU architecture: 8
> > CPU variant : 0x0
> > CPU part : 0xc00
> > CPU revision : 1
> >
> > # numactl -H
> > available: 1 nodes (0)
> > node 0 cpus: 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23
> > 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45
> > node 0 size: 97938 MB
> > node 0 free: 95732 MB
> > node distances:
> > node 0
> > 0: 10
> >
> > Regards,
> > Jan
> >
> > [1]
> > https://github.com/jstancek/reproducers/blob/master/kernel/page_fault_stall/mmap5.c
> > [2]
> > https://github.com/jstancek/reproducers/blob/master/kernel/page_fault_stall/config
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-05-06 21:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <820667266.20994189.1557058281210.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com>
2019-05-05 14:10 ` Jan Stancek
2019-05-06 19:04 ` Yang Shi
2019-05-06 21:35 ` Jan Stancek [this message]
2019-05-06 23:07 ` Yang Shi
2019-05-06 23:15 ` Yang Shi
2019-05-07 11:51 ` Jan Stancek
2019-05-07 16:42 ` Yang Shi
2019-05-07 17:19 ` Jan Stancek
2019-05-07 19:55 ` Yang Shi
2019-05-07 21:04 ` Yang Shi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1928544225.21255545.1557178548494.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com \
--to=jstancek@redhat.com \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kirill@shutemov.name \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox