linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>, torvalds@linux-foundation.org
Cc: corbet@lwn.net, will@kernel.org, boqun.feng@gmail.com,
	mark.rutland@arm.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com, dennis@kernel.org,
	tj@kernel.org, cl@linux.com, hca@linux.ibm.com,
	gor@linux.ibm.com, agordeev@linux.ibm.com,
	borntraeger@linux.ibm.com, svens@linux.ibm.com,
	tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de,
	dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, x86@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com,
	joro@8bytes.org, suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com,
	robin.murphy@arm.com, dwmw2@infradead.org,
	baolu.lu@linux.intel.com, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
	davem@davemloft.net, penberg@kernel.org, rientjes@google.com,
	iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	roman.gushchin@linux.dev, 42.hyeyoo@gmail.com,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
	iommu@lists.linux.dev, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 09/11] mm/slub: Fold slab_update_freelist()
Date: Wed, 24 May 2023 13:58:24 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <18c33bf0-0c7e-7584-5149-33cf77b50b8a@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230515080554.520976397@infradead.org>

On 5/15/23 09:57, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> The two functions slab_update_freelist() and __slab_update_freelist()
> are nearly identical, fold and add a boolean argument and rely on
> constant propagation.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>

Something like that has been tried before and the result:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAHk-=wiJLqL2cUhJbvpyPQpkbVOu1rVSzgO2=S2jC55hneLtfQ@mail.gmail.com/

Your parameter is not called 'locked' but 'irq_save' which is better, but
that's just one detail.

After your refactoring in 08/11 which puts most of the code into
__update_freelist_fast() and _slow() I'd say the result is not so bad already.

BTW I have some suspicion that some SLUB code is based on assumptions that
are no longer true these days. IIRC I've seen some microbenchmark results a
while ago that showed that disabling/enabling irqs is surprisingly (to me)
very cheap today, so maybe it's not so useful to keep doing the
this_cpu_cmpxchg128 for the struct kmem_cache_cpu operations (less so for
struct slab cmpxchg128 where actually different cpus may be involved). But
it needs a closer look.

> ---
>  mm/slub.c |   80 +++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------------------------
>  1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 52 deletions(-)
> 
> --- a/mm/slub.c
> +++ b/mm/slub.c
> @@ -559,53 +559,29 @@ __update_freelist_slow(struct slab *slab
>   * allocation/ free operation in hardirq context. Therefore nothing can
>   * interrupt the operation.
>   */
> -static inline bool __slab_update_freelist(struct kmem_cache *s, struct slab *slab,
> -		void *freelist_old, unsigned long counters_old,
> -		void *freelist_new, unsigned long counters_new,
> -		const char *n)
> +static __always_inline
> +bool slab_update_freelist(struct kmem_cache *s, struct slab *slab,
> +			  void *freelist_old, unsigned long counters_old,
> +			  void *freelist_new, unsigned long counters_new,
> +			  bool irq_save, const char *n)
>  {
>  	bool ret;
>  
> -	if (USE_LOCKLESS_FAST_PATH())
> +	if (!irq_save && USE_LOCKLESS_FAST_PATH())
>  		lockdep_assert_irqs_disabled();
>  
>  	if (s->flags & __CMPXCHG_DOUBLE) {
>  		ret = __update_freelist_fast(slab, freelist_old, counters_old,
>  				            freelist_new, counters_new);
>  	} else {
> -		ret = __update_freelist_slow(slab, freelist_old, counters_old,
> -				            freelist_new, counters_new);
> -	}
> -	if (likely(ret))
> -		return true;
> -
> -	cpu_relax();
> -	stat(s, CMPXCHG_DOUBLE_FAIL);
> -
> -#ifdef SLUB_DEBUG_CMPXCHG
> -	pr_info("%s %s: cmpxchg double redo ", n, s->name);
> -#endif
> -
> -	return false;
> -}
> -
> -static inline bool slab_update_freelist(struct kmem_cache *s, struct slab *slab,
> -		void *freelist_old, unsigned long counters_old,
> -		void *freelist_new, unsigned long counters_new,
> -		const char *n)
> -{
> -	bool ret;
> -
> -	if (s->flags & __CMPXCHG_DOUBLE) {
> -		ret = __update_freelist_fast(slab, freelist_old, counters_old,
> -				            freelist_new, counters_new);
> -	} else {
>  		unsigned long flags;
>  
> -		local_irq_save(flags);
> +		if (irq_save)
> +			local_irq_save(flags);
>  		ret = __update_freelist_slow(slab, freelist_old, counters_old,
>  				            freelist_new, counters_new);
> -		local_irq_restore(flags);
> +		if (irq_save)
> +			local_irq_restore(flags);
>  	}
>  	if (likely(ret))
>  		return true;
> @@ -2250,10 +2226,10 @@ static inline void *acquire_slab(struct
>  	VM_BUG_ON(new.frozen);
>  	new.frozen = 1;
>  
> -	if (!__slab_update_freelist(s, slab,
> -			freelist, counters,
> -			new.freelist, new.counters,
> -			"acquire_slab"))
> +	if (!slab_update_freelist(s, slab,
> +				  freelist, counters,
> +				  new.freelist, new.counters,
> +				  false, "acquire_slab"))
>  		return NULL;
>  
>  	remove_partial(n, slab);
> @@ -2577,9 +2553,9 @@ static void deactivate_slab(struct kmem_
>  
>  
>  	if (!slab_update_freelist(s, slab,
> -				old.freelist, old.counters,
> -				new.freelist, new.counters,
> -				"unfreezing slab")) {
> +				  old.freelist, old.counters,
> +				  new.freelist, new.counters,
> +				  true, "unfreezing slab")) {
>  		if (mode == M_PARTIAL)
>  			spin_unlock_irqrestore(&n->list_lock, flags);
>  		goto redo;
> @@ -2633,10 +2609,10 @@ static void __unfreeze_partials(struct k
>  
>  			new.frozen = 0;
>  
> -		} while (!__slab_update_freelist(s, slab,
> -				old.freelist, old.counters,
> -				new.freelist, new.counters,
> -				"unfreezing slab"));
> +		} while (!slab_update_freelist(s, slab,
> +					       old.freelist, old.counters,
> +					       new.freelist, new.counters,
> +					       false, "unfreezing slab"));
>  
>  		if (unlikely(!new.inuse && n->nr_partial >= s->min_partial)) {
>  			slab->next = slab_to_discard;
> @@ -3072,10 +3048,10 @@ static inline void *get_freelist(struct
>  		new.inuse = slab->objects;
>  		new.frozen = freelist != NULL;
>  
> -	} while (!__slab_update_freelist(s, slab,
> -		freelist, counters,
> -		NULL, new.counters,
> -		"get_freelist"));
> +	} while (!slab_update_freelist(s, slab,
> +				       freelist, counters,
> +				       NULL, new.counters,
> +				       false, "get_freelist"));
>  
>  	return freelist;
>  }
> @@ -3666,9 +3642,9 @@ static void __slab_free(struct kmem_cach
>  		}
>  
>  	} while (!slab_update_freelist(s, slab,
> -		prior, counters,
> -		head, new.counters,
> -		"__slab_free"));
> +				       prior, counters,
> +				       head, new.counters,
> +				       true, "__slab_free"));
>  
>  	if (likely(!n)) {
>  
> 
> 



  reply	other threads:[~2023-05-24 11:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-05-15  7:56 [PATCH v3 00/11] Introduce cmpxchg128() -- aka. the demise of cmpxchg_double() Peter Zijlstra
2023-05-15  7:57 ` [PATCH v3 01/11] cyrpto/b128ops: Remove struct u128 Peter Zijlstra
2023-05-15  7:57 ` [PATCH v3 02/11] types: Introduce [us]128 Peter Zijlstra
2023-05-15  7:57 ` [PATCH v3 03/11] arch: Introduce arch_{,try_}_cmpxchg128{,_local}() Peter Zijlstra
2023-05-15  7:57 ` [PATCH v3 04/11] instrumentation: Wire up cmpxchg128() Peter Zijlstra
2023-05-15  7:57 ` [PATCH v3 05/11] percpu: Wire up cmpxchg128 Peter Zijlstra
2023-05-25 12:49   ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-05-25 22:59     ` Petr Tesařík
2023-05-15  7:57 ` [PATCH v3 06/11] x86,amd_iommu: Replace cmpxchg_double() Peter Zijlstra
2023-05-15  7:57 ` [PATCH v3 07/11] x86,intel_iommu: " Peter Zijlstra
2023-05-15  7:57 ` [PATCH v3 08/11] slub: " Peter Zijlstra
2023-05-24  9:32   ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-05-24 10:13     ` Vlastimil Babka
2023-05-25 10:29     ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-05-25 10:52       ` Arnd Bergmann
2023-05-25 13:10         ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-05-30 14:22     ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-05-30 19:32       ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-05-15  7:57 ` [PATCH v3 09/11] mm/slub: Fold slab_update_freelist() Peter Zijlstra
2023-05-24 11:58   ` Vlastimil Babka [this message]
2023-05-15  7:57 ` [PATCH v3 10/11] arch: Remove cmpxchg_double Peter Zijlstra
2023-05-15  8:52   ` Heiko Carstens
2023-05-15  7:57 ` [PATCH v3 11/11] s390/cpum_sf: Convert to cmpxchg128() Peter Zijlstra
2023-05-15  9:42 ` [PATCH v3 00/11] Introduce cmpxchg128() -- aka. the demise of cmpxchg_double() Arnd Bergmann
2023-05-24  9:39   ` Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=18c33bf0-0c7e-7584-5149-33cf77b50b8a@suse.cz \
    --to=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=42.hyeyoo@gmail.com \
    --cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=cl@linux.com \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dennis@kernel.org \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=penberg@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
    --cc=suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com \
    --cc=svens@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox