linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "John Stoffel" <john@stoffel.org>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: John Stoffel <john@stoffel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Lee Schermerhorn <lee.schermerhorn@hp.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com,
	eric.whitney@hp.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, npiggin@suse.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/25] Vm Pageout Scalability Improvements (V8) - continued
Date: Fri, 30 May 2008 10:36:05 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <18496.4309.393775.511382@stoffel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080530102917.45cbca64@bree.surriel.com>


Rik> On Fri, 30 May 2008 09:52:48 -0400
Rik> "John Stoffel" <john@stoffel.org> wrote:

>> I haven't seen any performance numbers talking about how well this
>> stuff works on single or dual CPU machines with smaller amounts of
>> memory, or whether it's worth using on these machines at all?
>> 
>> The big machines with lots of memory and lots of CPUs are certainly
>> becoming more prevalent, but for my home machine with 4Gb RAM and dual
>> core, what's the advantage?  
>> 
>> Let's not slow down the common case for the sake of the bigger guys if
>> possible.

Rik> I wouldn't call your home system with 4GB RAM "small".

*grin* me either in some ways.  But my other main linux box, which
acts as an NFS server has 2Gb of RAM, but a pair of PIII Xeons at
550mhz.  This is the box I'd be worried about in some ways, since it
handles a bunch of stuff like backups, mysql, apache, NFS server,
etc.  

Rik> After all, the VM that Linux currently has was developed mostly
Rik> on machines with less than 1GB of RAM and later encrusted in
Rik> bandaids to make sure the large systems did not fail too badly.

Sure, I understand.  

Rik> As for small system performance, I believe that my patch series
Rik> should cause no performance regressions on those systems and has
Rik> a framework that allows us to improve performance on those
Rik> systems too.

Great!  It would be nice to just be able to track this nicely.

Rik> If you manage to break performance with my patch set somehow,
Rik> please let me know so I can fix it.  Something like the VM is
Rik> very subtle and any change is pretty much guaranteed to break
Rik> something, so I am very interested in feedback.

What are you using to test/benchmark your changes as you develop this
patchset?  What would you suggest as a test load to help check
performance?

John

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2008-05-30 14:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-05-29 19:50 Lee Schermerhorn
2008-05-29 19:50 ` [PATCH 13/25] Noreclaim LRU Infrastructure Lee Schermerhorn
2008-05-29 19:50 ` [PATCH 14/25] Noreclaim LRU Page Statistics Lee Schermerhorn
2008-05-29 19:50 ` [PATCH 15/25] Ramfs and Ram Disk pages are non-reclaimable Lee Schermerhorn
2008-05-29 19:50 ` [PATCH 16/25] SHM_LOCKED " Lee Schermerhorn, Lee Schermerhorn
2008-05-29 19:51 ` [PATCH 17/25] Mlocked Pages " Lee Schermerhorn
2008-05-29 19:51 ` [PATCH 18/25] Downgrade mmap sem while populating mlocked regions Lee Schermerhorn, Lee Schermerhorn
2008-05-29 19:51 ` [PATCH 19/25] Handle mlocked pages during map, remap, unmap Lee Schermerhorn
2008-05-29 19:51 ` [PATCH 20/25] Mlocked Pages statistics Lee Schermerhorn, Nick Piggin
2008-05-29 19:51 ` [PATCH 21/25] Cull non-reclaimable pages in fault path Lee Schermerhorn, Lee Schermerhorn
2008-05-29 19:51 ` [PATCH 22/25] Noreclaim and Mlocked pages vm events Lee Schermerhorn, Lee Schermerhorn
2008-05-29 19:51 ` [PATCH 23/25] Noreclaim LRU scan sysctl Lee Schermerhorn, Lee Schermerhorn
2008-05-29 19:51 ` [PATCH 24/25] Mlocked Pages: count attempts to free mlocked page Lee Schermerhorn
2008-05-29 19:51 ` [PATCH 25/25] Noreclaim LRU and Mlocked Pages Documentation Lee Schermerhorn
2008-05-29 20:16 ` [PATCH 00/25] Vm Pageout Scalability Improvements (V8) - continued Andrew Morton
2008-05-29 20:20   ` Rik van Riel
2008-05-30  1:56     ` MinChan Kim
2008-05-30 13:52     ` John Stoffel
2008-05-30 14:29       ` Rik van Riel
2008-05-30 14:36         ` John Stoffel [this message]
2008-05-30 15:27           ` Rik van Riel
2008-05-30  9:27 ` KOSAKI Motohiro

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=18496.4309.393775.511382@stoffel.org \
    --to=john@stoffel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=eric.whitney@hp.com \
    --cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=lee.schermerhorn@hp.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=npiggin@suse.de \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox