linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	Wen Congyang <wency@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>,
	Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
	Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch v5 0/7] acpi,memory-hotplug: implement framework for hot removing memory
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2012 02:28:14 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1819346.BWGqmHiiPA@vostro.rjw.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50A591E5.9080906@jp.fujitsu.com>

On Friday, November 16, 2012 10:07:49 AM Yasuaki Ishimatsu wrote:
> Hi Rafael,
> 
> 2012/11/16 9:28, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Thursday, November 15, 2012 02:59:30 PM Wen Congyang wrote:
> >> The memory device can be removed by 2 ways:
> >> 1. send eject request by SCI
> >> 2. echo 1 >/sys/bus/pci/devices/PNP0C80:XX/eject
> >>
> >> In the 1st case, acpi_memory_disable_device() will be called.
> >> In the 2nd case, acpi_memory_device_remove() will be called.
> >> acpi_memory_device_remove() will also be called when we unbind the
> >> memory device from the driver acpi_memhotplug or a driver initialization
> >> fails.
> >>
> >> acpi_memory_disable_device() has already implemented a code which
> >> offlines memory and releases acpi_memory_info struct . But
> >> acpi_memory_device_remove() has not implemented it yet.
> >>
> >> So the patch prepares the framework for hot removing memory and
> >> adds the framework into acpi_memory_device_remove().
> >>
> >> We may hotremove the memory device by this 2 ways at the same time.
> >> So we remove the function acpi_memory_disable_device(), and use
> >> acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() which is used by 2nd case to implement it.
> >> We lock device in acpi_bus_hot_remove_device(), so there is no
> >> need to add lock in acpi_memhotplug.
> >>
> >> The last version of this patchset is here:
> >> https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/11/8/121
> >>
> >> Note:
> >> 1. The following commit in pm tree can be dropped now(The other two patches
> >>     are already dropped):
> >>     54c4c7db6cb94d7d1217df6d7fca6847c61744ab
> >> 2. This patchset requires the following patch(It is in pm tree now)
> >>     https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/11/1/225
> >>
> >> Changes from v4 to v5:
> >> 1. patch2: new patch. use acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() to implement memory
> >>     device hotremove.
> >>
> >> Changes from v3 to v4:
> >> 1. patch1: unlock list_lock when removing memory fails.
> >> 2. patch2: just rebase them
> >> 3. patch3-7: these patches are in -mm tree, and they conflict with this
> >>     patchset, so Adrew Morton drop them from -mm tree. I rebase and merge
> >>     them into this patchset.
> >>
> >> Wen Congyang (6):
> >>    acpi,memory-hotplug: deal with eject request in hotplug queue
> >>    acpi_memhotplug.c: fix memory leak when memory device is unbound from
> >>      the module acpi_memhotplug
> >>    acpi_memhotplug.c: free memory device if acpi_memory_enable_device()
> >>      failed
> >>    acpi_memhotplug.c: don't allow to eject the memory device if it is
> >>      being used
> >>    acpi_memhotplug.c: bind the memory device when the driver is being
> >>      loaded
> >>    acpi_memhotplug.c: auto bind the memory device which is hotplugged
> >>      before the driver is loaded
> >>
> >> Yasuaki Ishimatsu (1):
> >>    acpi,memory-hotplug : add memory offline code to
> >>      acpi_memory_device_remove()
> >
> > Well, I have tried _really_ hard to apply this patchset, but pretty much
> > none of the patches except for [1/7] applied for me.  I have no idea what
> > tree they are against, but I'm pretty sure it's not my tree.
> >
> > I _have_ applied patches [1-4/7] and pushed them to linux-pm.git/linux-next.
> 
> I checked your tree and found a mistake.
> You merged a following patch into your tree.
> 
> commitid:2ba281f1
> ACPI / memory-hotplug: introduce a mutex lock to protect the list
> in acpi_memory_device
> 
> But it is wrong.
> 
> [1/7] patch is "acpi,memory-hotplug : add memory offline code to
> acpi_memory_device_remove()". So we would like you to merge it
> instead of commitid:2ba281f1.

Yes, I've found it too.

Now applied patches [1-6/7], because I agree with Toshi Kani that patch [7/7]
goes too far, so I'm not going to apply it.

Thanks,
Rafael


-- 
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2012-11-16  1:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-11-15  6:59 Wen Congyang
2012-11-15  6:59 ` [Patch v5 1/7] acpi,memory-hotplug : add memory offline code to acpi_memory_device_remove() Wen Congyang
2012-11-15 23:03   ` David Rientjes
2012-11-15  6:59 ` [Patch v5 2/7] acpi,memory-hotplug: deal with eject request in hotplug queue Wen Congyang
2012-11-15  9:13   ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-11-15 22:09   ` Toshi Kani
2012-11-15 23:32   ` David Rientjes
2012-11-16  1:54     ` Wen Congyang
2012-11-15  6:59 ` [Patch v5 3/7] acpi_memhotplug.c: fix memory leak when memory device is unbound from the module acpi_memhotplug Wen Congyang
2012-11-15  9:15   ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-11-15 23:34   ` David Rientjes
2012-11-15  6:59 ` [Patch v5 4/7] acpi_memhotplug.c: free memory device if acpi_memory_enable_device() failed Wen Congyang
2012-11-15  9:17   ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-11-15 23:36   ` David Rientjes
2012-11-15  6:59 ` [Patch v5 5/7] acpi_memhotplug.c: don't allow to eject the memory device if it is being used Wen Congyang
2012-11-15  9:20   ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-11-15 23:39   ` David Rientjes
2012-11-29 13:15   ` andywu106建国
2012-11-15  6:59 ` [Patch v5 6/7] acpi_memhotplug.c: bind the memory device when the driver is being loaded Wen Congyang
2012-11-15  9:22   ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-11-15 23:40   ` David Rientjes
2012-11-15  6:59 ` [Patch v5 7/7] acpi_memhotplug.c: auto bind the memory device which is hotplugged before the driver is loaded Wen Congyang
2012-11-15  9:57   ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-11-15 22:45   ` Toshi Kani
2012-11-15 22:51 ` [Patch v5 0/7] acpi,memory-hotplug: implement framework for hot removing memory David Rientjes
2012-11-15 23:22   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-15 23:33     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-16  0:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-16  0:40   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-16  0:40     ` Toshi Kani
2012-11-16  1:02       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-16  1:07   ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-11-16  1:28     ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2012-11-16  1:31       ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1819346.BWGqmHiiPA@vostro.rjw.lan \
    --to=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=jiang.liu@huawei.com \
    --cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
    --cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=len.brown@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=minchan.kim@gmail.com \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=toshi.kani@hp.com \
    --cc=wency@cn.fujitsu.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox