From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-12.6 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 196DEC47420 for ; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 22:51:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B59DA23600 for ; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 22:51:57 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.b="fnWeMmJQ" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org B59DA23600 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=reject dis=none) header.from=google.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 5AB1E900003; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 18:51:57 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 55B668E0001; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 18:51:57 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 421E2900003; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 18:51:57 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0102.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.102]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 289968E0001 for ; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 18:51:57 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin01.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay01.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB657180AD801 for ; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 22:51:56 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 77299454232.01.sofa15_1e17c7527162 Received: from filter.hostedemail.com (10.5.16.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.16.251]) by smtpin01.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDA0A1004F62A for ; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 22:51:56 +0000 (UTC) X-HE-Tag: sofa15_1e17c7527162 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 7448 Received: from mail-wr1-f74.google.com (mail-wr1-f74.google.com [209.85.221.74]) by imf42.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 22:51:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wr1-f74.google.com with SMTP id b7so291752wrn.6 for ; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 15:51:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=sender:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:subject :from:to:cc; bh=DwY0XJ+mNp8uQtCgvLTc+GHO/ICbiZZuKiMqQmp5BSw=; b=fnWeMmJQLU3oHbLupDqgsMX/MJf3lZiB+lnG53XCUujmVOZcdrJp66+A9acbYwSThA mc164WQR4vPd2o3XvQV+uU78vuCdjqIMWpWVaaN5lVZA8MRAmKWW9MmsmBCh7WuxTQst abxJ1iVQhRwt+7CJgK9aYS+wKveaF0X72gmUNVykFvalcDAAIHrgnlQqr0xtuIQ1rWlG DKrWHeceS4xeqsWvi9VmEQoIZTsf4oR0a/OT4P/ILTuPZgcAAyGibhSueg8aTDLFexfJ TozxDIGw1y402M4caZQ5Sf4ifcNVIlbJ3JEYGQQA50hfZkQ9zVcwlokslQf7wadlAe+f nT7Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:subject:from:to:cc; bh=DwY0XJ+mNp8uQtCgvLTc+GHO/ICbiZZuKiMqQmp5BSw=; b=tNdD5BE2w81X9KhKUasEGBLY3sgT1MBo2FNlxQhmXGhAF9zTfdVevbXCtnitwm44ze hCU3WMWz6ogk6WseeKd6L/Ri6/Bbw9pS90ySnaC/0rA8csrUvYPfTB7D0fe7FtBTHAID wNWIsC8PFVJy2Zvsv2704ilR07OU5pu7Mp/Nv4JUj8YibK30oArDxvTkRMItAMAjox6x uMsyAQ8J2wXQIFAzvNqxabYxGgP4INgXyZ+tl+F+ZKHQjXEZ/WCIHfYSsZFdP8g1LqYx rnxKbGh/BGZM9ppuxny+Ylh9YlRpxjylUFh/e9kwIDjvNCRpc26IIRW0Gn1s3beSb4FX eZNA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5306y1AD8Xqp58nN4LG/ca61eBvbGT1zBP3prd1ZTWki+9c1SkAS 1u6qlukUuV7UnqiK6l4UUdUiSmA6Wxwxhdks X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxBwcfk6F/JbL9VArMBFeE13MUrJlwy29q40146eCD6EncjS3WbBk4yofyDTqASykbTAZtetSw5cOH2ohnN X-Received: from andreyknvl3.muc.corp.google.com ([2a00:79e0:15:13:7220:84ff:fe09:7e9d]) (user=andreyknvl job=sendgmr) by 2002:a7b:c14f:: with SMTP id z15mr113wmi.1.1600987914792; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 15:51:54 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2020 00:50:33 +0200 In-Reply-To: Message-Id: <17ec8af55dc0a4d3ade679feb0858f0df4c80d27.1600987622.git.andreyknvl@google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 References: X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.28.0.681.g6f77f65b4e-goog Subject: [PATCH v3 26/39] arm64: mte: Add in-kernel tag fault handler From: Andrey Konovalov To: Dmitry Vyukov , Vincenzo Frascino , Catalin Marinas , kasan-dev@googlegroups.com Cc: Andrey Ryabinin , Alexander Potapenko , Marco Elver , Evgenii Stepanov , Elena Petrova , Branislav Rankov , Kevin Brodsky , Will Deacon , Andrew Morton , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrey Konovalov Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: From: Vincenzo Frascino Add the implementation of the in-kernel fault handler. When a tag fault happens on a kernel address: * MTE is disabled on the current CPU, * the execution continues. When a tag fault happens on a user address: * the kernel executes do_bad_area() and panics. The tag fault handler for kernel addresses is currently empty and will be filled in by a future commit. Signed-off-by: Vincenzo Frascino Co-developed-by: Andrey Konovalov Signed-off-by: Andrey Konovalov --- Change-Id: I9b8aa79567f7c45f4d6a1290efcf34567e620717 --- arch/arm64/include/asm/uaccess.h | 23 +++++++++++++++++++ arch/arm64/mm/fault.c | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- 2 files changed, 60 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/uaccess.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/uaccess.h index 991dd5f031e4..c7fff8daf2a7 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/uaccess.h +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/uaccess.h @@ -200,13 +200,36 @@ do { \ CONFIG_ARM64_PAN)); \ } while (0) +/* + * The Tag Check Flag (TCF) mode for MTE is per EL, hence TCF0 + * affects EL0 and TCF affects EL1 irrespective of which TTBR is + * used. + * The kernel accesses TTBR0 usually with LDTR/STTR instructions + * when UAO is available, so these would act as EL0 accesses using + * TCF0. + * However futex.h code uses exclusives which would be executed as + * EL1, this can potentially cause a tag check fault even if the + * user disables TCF0. + * + * To address the problem we set the PSTATE.TCO bit in uaccess_enable() + * and reset it in uaccess_disable(). + * + * The Tag check override (TCO) bit disables temporarily the tag checking + * preventing the issue. + */ static inline void uaccess_disable(void) { + asm volatile(ALTERNATIVE("nop", SET_PSTATE_TCO(0), + ARM64_MTE, CONFIG_KASAN_HW_TAGS)); + __uaccess_disable(ARM64_HAS_PAN); } static inline void uaccess_enable(void) { + asm volatile(ALTERNATIVE("nop", SET_PSTATE_TCO(1), + ARM64_MTE, CONFIG_KASAN_HW_TAGS)); + __uaccess_enable(ARM64_HAS_PAN); } diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c b/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c index a3bd189602df..d110f382dacf 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c @@ -33,6 +33,7 @@ #include #include #include +#include #include #include #include @@ -294,6 +295,11 @@ static void die_kernel_fault(const char *msg, unsigned long addr, do_exit(SIGKILL); } +static void report_tag_fault(unsigned long addr, unsigned int esr, + struct pt_regs *regs) +{ +} + static void __do_kernel_fault(unsigned long addr, unsigned int esr, struct pt_regs *regs) { @@ -641,10 +647,40 @@ static int do_sea(unsigned long addr, unsigned int esr, struct pt_regs *regs) return 0; } +static void do_tag_recovery(unsigned long addr, unsigned int esr, + struct pt_regs *regs) +{ + static bool reported = false; + + if (!READ_ONCE(reported)) { + report_tag_fault(addr, esr, regs); + WRITE_ONCE(reported, true); + } + + /* + * Disable MTE Tag Checking on the local CPU for the current EL. + * It will be done lazily on the other CPUs when they will hit a + * tag fault. + */ + sysreg_clear_set(sctlr_el1, SCTLR_ELx_TCF_MASK, SCTLR_ELx_TCF_NONE); + isb(); +} + + static int do_tag_check_fault(unsigned long addr, unsigned int esr, struct pt_regs *regs) { - do_bad_area(addr, esr, regs); + /* + * The tag check fault (TCF) is per EL, hence TCF0 affects + * EL0 and TCF affects EL1. + * TTBR0 address belong by convention to EL0 hence to correctly + * discriminate we use the is_ttbr0_addr() macro. + */ + if (is_ttbr0_addr(addr)) + do_bad_area(addr, esr, regs); + else + do_tag_recovery(addr, esr, regs); + return 0; } -- 2.28.0.681.g6f77f65b4e-goog