linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "David Hildenbrand (Arm)" <david@kernel.org>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Lorenzo Stoakes <ljs@kernel.org>,
	"Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>,
	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@kernel.org>,
	Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
	Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: Aishwarya TCV <aishwarya.tcv@arm.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] selftests/mm: Specify requirement for PROC_MEM_ALWAYS_FORCE=y
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2026 21:05:11 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <17ea54b2-d43f-49a9-9dd4-d2330a8daa92@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260416-selftests-mm-proc-mem-always-force-v1-1-3f5865153c67@kernel.org>

On 4/16/26 20:40, Mark Brown wrote:
> Several of the mm selftests made use of /proc/pid/mem as part of their
> operation but we do not specify this in the config fragment for them, at
> least mkdirty and ksm_functional_tests have this requirement.
> 
> This has been working fine in practice since PROC_MEM_ALWAYS_FORCE was the
> default setting but commit 599bbba5a36f ("proc: make PROC_MEM_FORCE_PTRACE
> the Kconfig default") that is no longer the case, meaning that tests run
> on kernels built based on defconfigs have started having the new more
> restrictive default and failing. Add PROC_MEM_ALWAYS_FORCE to the config
> fragment for the mm selftests.
> 
> Thanks to Aishwarya TCV for spotting the issue and identifying the commit
> that introduced it.
> 
> Reported-by: Aishwarya TCV <aishwarya.tcv@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
> ---

I guess we could teach most tests to SKIP if /proc/pid/mem is unusable.

Acked-by: David Hildenbrand (Arm) <david@kernel.org>

-- 
Cheers,

David


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-04-16 19:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-04-16 18:40 Mark Brown
2026-04-16 18:56 ` Mike Rapoport
2026-04-16 19:05 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm) [this message]
2026-04-16 19:10   ` Mark Brown
2026-04-16 19:28     ` Mike Rapoport
2026-04-17  2:56       ` Anshuman Khandual
2026-04-17  4:36       ` Dev Jain
2026-04-17 11:24       ` Mark Brown
2026-04-17  2:57 ` Anshuman Khandual
2026-04-17  4:37 ` Dev Jain

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=17ea54b2-d43f-49a9-9dd4-d2330a8daa92@kernel.org \
    --to=david@kernel.org \
    --cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
    --cc=aishwarya.tcv@arm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=ljs@kernel.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=surenb@google.com \
    --cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox