From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@kernel.org>
To: "Yunsheng Lin" <linyunsheng@huawei.com>,
"Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@redhat.com>,
davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com
Cc: zhangkun09@huawei.com, fanghaiqing@huawei.com,
liuyonglong@huawei.com, Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@gmail.com>,
IOMMU <iommu@lists.linux.dev>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team <kernel-team@cloudflare.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 3/3] page_pool: fix IOMMU crash when driver has already unbound
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2024 16:11:46 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <17a24d69-7bf0-412c-a32a-b25d82bb4159@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <40c9b515-1284-4c49-bdce-c9eeff5092f9@huawei.com>
On 18/11/2024 10.08, Yunsheng Lin wrote:
> On 2024/11/12 22:19, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
>>>
>>> Yes, there seems to be many MM system internals, like the CONFIG_SPARSEMEM*
>>> config, memory offline/online and other MM specific optimization that it
>>> is hard to tell it is feasible.
>>>
>>> It would be good if MM experts can clarify on this.
>>>
>>
>> Yes, please. Can Alex Duyck or MM-experts point me at some code walking
>> entire system page table?
>>
>> Then I'll write some kernel code (maybe module) that I can benchmark how
>> long it takes on my machine with 384GiB. I do like Alex'es suggestion,
>> but I want to assess the overhead of doing this on modern hardware.
>>
>
> After looking more closely into MM subsystem, it seems there is some existing
> pattern or API to walk the entire pages from the buddy allocator subsystem,
> see the kmemleak_scan() in mm/kmemleak.c:
> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.12/source/mm/kmemleak.c#L1680
>
> I used that to walk the pages in a arm64 system with over 300GB memory,
> it took about 1.3 sec to do the walking, which seems acceptable?
Yes, that seems acceptable to me.
I'll also do a test on one of my 384 GB systems.
- It took approx 0.391661 seconds.
I just deref page->pp_magic and counted the pages, not many page were
in-use (page_count(page) > 0) as machine has just been rebooted into
this kernel:
- pages=100592572 in-use:2079607
--Jesper
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-18 15:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20241022032214.3915232-1-linyunsheng@huawei.com>
2024-10-22 3:22 ` Yunsheng Lin
2024-10-22 16:40 ` Simon Horman
2024-10-22 18:14 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2024-10-23 8:59 ` Yunsheng Lin
2024-10-24 14:40 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2024-10-25 3:20 ` Yunsheng Lin
2024-10-25 11:16 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2024-10-25 14:07 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2024-10-26 7:33 ` Yunsheng Lin
2024-11-06 13:25 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2024-11-06 15:57 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2024-11-06 19:55 ` Alexander Duyck
2024-11-07 11:10 ` Yunsheng Lin
2024-11-07 11:09 ` Yunsheng Lin
2024-11-11 11:31 ` Yunsheng Lin
2024-11-11 18:51 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2024-11-12 12:22 ` Yunsheng Lin
2024-11-12 14:19 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2024-11-13 12:21 ` Yunsheng Lin
[not found] ` <40c9b515-1284-4c49-bdce-c9eeff5092f9@huawei.com>
2024-11-18 15:11 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer [this message]
2024-10-26 7:32 ` Yunsheng Lin
2024-10-29 13:58 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2024-10-30 11:30 ` Yunsheng Lin
2024-10-30 11:57 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2024-10-31 12:17 ` Yunsheng Lin
2024-10-31 16:18 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2024-11-01 11:11 ` Yunsheng Lin
2024-11-05 20:11 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2024-11-06 10:56 ` Yunsheng Lin
2024-11-06 14:17 ` Robin Murphy
2024-11-07 8:41 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=17a24d69-7bf0-412c-a32a-b25d82bb4159@kernel.org \
--to=hawk@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alexander.duyck@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=fanghaiqing@huawei.com \
--cc=ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=kernel-team@cloudflare.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linyunsheng@huawei.com \
--cc=liuyonglong@huawei.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=toke@redhat.com \
--cc=zhangkun09@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox