From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.1 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52397C433FE for ; Thu, 16 Sep 2021 21:58:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0B6460EE4 for ; Thu, 16 Sep 2021 21:58:14 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org D0B6460EE4 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 48F49900002; Thu, 16 Sep 2021 17:58:14 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 43E116B0072; Thu, 16 Sep 2021 17:58:14 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 353E3900002; Thu, 16 Sep 2021 17:58:14 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0154.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.154]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2999A6B0071 for ; Thu, 16 Sep 2021 17:58:14 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin39.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay01.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7526180ACEFB for ; Thu, 16 Sep 2021 21:58:13 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 78594800466.39.075750D Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by imf16.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 753B5F00009D for ; Thu, 16 Sep 2021 21:58:13 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1631829492; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=S7+YMmIXw9LQayHd2lCNryDpntnlyqVSMgHcgd/qI8Y=; b=LNn9UwcqXSC0tABIv6z738cxKLe3V5RQzOpfboLuAPllFcYB5GVKIowntweZdsQKVyf9z7 nGugZU+usIMw2JdZAmq03+CIH1Tg7pZQr10CXfjKlO6UOpvydhA5tXjgT8fIaYjm1Ubu9t RhQxmXnn99nJ7vNUt3X3QawYIePA1Ck= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-472-xq4bETqxNqyM7wgCNTkOHw-1; Thu, 16 Sep 2021 17:58:11 -0400 X-MC-Unique: xq4bETqxNqyM7wgCNTkOHw-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 18DD2801B3D; Thu, 16 Sep 2021 21:58:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from warthog.procyon.org.uk (unknown [10.33.36.44]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E299C5FCA6; Thu, 16 Sep 2021 21:58:07 +0000 (UTC) Organization: Red Hat UK Ltd. Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SI4 1TE, United Kingdom. Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 3798903 From: David Howells In-Reply-To: References: <20210916025854.GE34899@magnolia> To: Johannes Weiner Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, "Darrick J. Wong" , Kent Overstreet , Matthew Wilcox , Linus Torvalds , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: Folio discussion recap MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <1791362.1631829486.1@warthog.procyon.org.uk> Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2021 22:58:07 +0100 Message-ID: <1791363.1631829487@warthog.procyon.org.uk> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.12 X-Rspamd-Server: rspam04 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 753B5F00009D X-Stat-Signature: m3in6opkqi4ms8sub9pjyb5y317737js Authentication-Results: imf16.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=LNn9Uwcq; spf=none (imf16.hostedemail.com: domain of dhowells@redhat.com has no SPF policy when checking 170.10.133.124) smtp.mailfrom=dhowells@redhat.com; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=redhat.com X-HE-Tag: 1631829493-496983 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: Johannes Weiner wrote: > I know Kent was surprised by this. I know Dave Chinner suggested to > call it "cache page" or "cage" early on, which also suggests an > understanding of a *dedicated* cache page descriptor. If we are aiming to get pages out of the view of the filesystem, then we should probably not include "page" in the name. "Data cache" would seem obvious, but we already have that concept for the CPU. How about something like "struct content" and rename i_pages to i_content? David