linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hao Ge <hao.ge@linux.dev>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
	Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	Hao Ge <gehao@kylinos.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/alloc_tag: add the ARCH_NEEDS_WEAK_PER_CPU macro when statically defining the percpu variable alloc_tag_counters.
Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2025 14:08:03 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <177e1f6b-50f0-4c0a-bb0b-514283e009a2@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250529073537.563107-1-hao.ge@linux.dev>


On 2025/5/29 15:35, Hao Ge wrote:
> From: Hao Ge <gehao@kylinos.cn>
>
> Recently discovered this entry while checking kallsyms on ARM64:
> ffff800083e509c0 D _shared_alloc_tag
>
> If ARCH_NEEDS_WEAK_PER_CPU is not defined,there's no need to statically
> define the percpu variable alloc_tag_counters.
>
> Therefore,add therelevant macro guards at the appropriate location.
>
> Fixes: 22d407b164ff ("lib: add allocation tagging support for memory allocation profiling")
> Signed-off-by: Hao Ge <gehao@kylinos.cn>
> ---
>   lib/alloc_tag.c | 2 ++
>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/lib/alloc_tag.c b/lib/alloc_tag.c
> index c7f602fa7b23..d1dab80b70ad 100644
> --- a/lib/alloc_tag.c
> +++ b/lib/alloc_tag.c
> @@ -24,8 +24,10 @@ static bool mem_profiling_support;
>   
>   static struct codetag_type *alloc_tag_cttype;
>   
> +#ifdef ARCH_NEEDS_WEAK_PER_CPU
>   DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct alloc_tag_counters, _shared_alloc_tag);
>   EXPORT_SYMBOL(_shared_alloc_tag);
> +#endif /* ARCH_NEEDS_WEAK_PER_CPU */
>   
>   DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_MAYBE(CONFIG_MEM_ALLOC_PROFILING_ENABLED_BY_DEFAULT,
>   			mem_alloc_profiling_key);

Hi Suren


I'm sorry to bother you. As mentioned in my commit message,

in fact, on the ARM64 architecture, the _shared_alloc_tag percpu 
variable is not needed.

In my understanding, it will create a copy for each CPU.

  The alloc_tag_counters variable will occupy 16 bytes,

and as the number of CPUs increases, more and more memory will be wasted 
in this segment.

I realized that this modification was a mistake. It resulted in a build 
error, and the link is as follows:

https://lore.kernel.org/all/202506080448.KWN8arrX-lkp@intel.com/

After I studied the comments of DECLARE_PER_CPU_SECTION, I roughly 
understood why this is the case.

But so far, I haven't come up with a good way to solve this problem. Do 
you have any suggestions?


Thanks

Best Regards

Hao






  reply	other threads:[~2025-06-09  6:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-05-29  7:35 Hao Ge
2025-06-09  6:08 ` Hao Ge [this message]
2025-06-09 16:39   ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2025-06-11  5:26     ` Hao Ge
2025-06-11 15:24       ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2025-06-12  1:38         ` Hao Ge

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=177e1f6b-50f0-4c0a-bb0b-514283e009a2@linux.dev \
    --to=hao.ge@linux.dev \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=gehao@kylinos.cn \
    --cc=kent.overstreet@linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=surenb@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox