From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.1 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E98BBC433EF for ; Thu, 16 Sep 2021 13:51:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0F926124D for ; Thu, 16 Sep 2021 13:51:23 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org A0F926124D Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 131146B0071; Thu, 16 Sep 2021 09:51:23 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 0E0826B0072; Thu, 16 Sep 2021 09:51:23 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id EEA706B0073; Thu, 16 Sep 2021 09:51:22 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0062.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.62]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1E736B0071 for ; Thu, 16 Sep 2021 09:51:22 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin01.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay03.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8728582499A8 for ; Thu, 16 Sep 2021 13:51:22 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 78593573604.01.D4594E7 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by imf15.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46986D0000A1 for ; Thu, 16 Sep 2021 13:51:22 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1631800281; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=4lVrPdsoP5O/cM/OSAIFtewkyqRFucE9aREXO9piQ+4=; b=ggemZuBk+kMGJrsxLIgzNQ7aBWNaPzD2SoU63quAODI/JEC311SPu7G5BVTCY7NApJqLMe KeBLlhhVYATBgTxNpJyeUF1rpdo6g/ozW3PAzrG5fwWAHVPaW796aZV7B8YG9Ep7UjOlPa 2BsBPp9F6E7tH0GeAXzB00NyKwb6qwk= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-416-wINEPB07OC23uIxFVwSC_g-1; Thu, 16 Sep 2021 09:51:18 -0400 X-MC-Unique: wINEPB07OC23uIxFVwSC_g-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 88A48100C660; Thu, 16 Sep 2021 13:51:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from warthog.procyon.org.uk (unknown [10.33.36.44]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CB6E5D9C6; Thu, 16 Sep 2021 13:51:12 +0000 (UTC) Organization: Red Hat UK Ltd. Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SI4 1TE, United Kingdom. Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 3798903 From: David Howells In-Reply-To: References: <17242A0C-3613-41BB-84E4-2617A182216E@fb.com> To: "Theodore Ts'o" Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, James Bottomley , Chris Mason , Johannes Weiner , Kent Overstreet , Matthew Wilcox , Linus Torvalds , "linux-mm@kvack.org" , linux-fsdevel , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Andrew Morton , "Darrick J. Wong" , Christoph Hellwig , "ksummit@lists.linux.dev" Subject: Re: [MAINTAINER SUMMIT] Folios as a potential Kernel/Maintainers Summit topic? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <1763246.1631800271.1@warthog.procyon.org.uk> Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2021 14:51:11 +0100 Message-ID: <1763247.1631800271@warthog.procyon.org.uk> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.14 X-Rspamd-Server: rspam01 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 46986D0000A1 Authentication-Results: imf15.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=ggemZuBk; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=redhat.com; spf=none (imf15.hostedemail.com: domain of dhowells@redhat.com has no SPF policy when checking 170.10.133.124) smtp.mailfrom=dhowells@redhat.com X-Stat-Signature: 8964ntym1ofcxzxx9nqpka7ibd1jyidf X-HE-Tag: 1631800282-951384 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: Theodore Ts'o wrote: > > My reading of the email threads is that they're iterating to an actual > > conclusion (I admit, I'm surprised) ... or at least the disagreements > > are getting less. Since the merge window closed this is now a 5.16 > > thing, so there's no huge urgency to getting it resolved next week. > > My read was that it was more that people were just getting exhausted, > and not necessarily that folks were converging. The problem, from where I sit, is that I'd started rebasing my stuff on top of Willy's patches and making use of them in the expectation that they were likely to go in - and I think other people might have been doing that too based on some of the comments. However, that's all been thrown up in the air. Not only did they not get merged in this window, it's not currently looking certain that they'd get merged in the next window either. So what do I do? Do I defoliate my patches - which then risks merge conflicts with the folio patches? Or do I stick with the foliation and hope that Willy's goes in next time? Some guidance as to what's likely to happen to the folio patches would be really appreciated! David