On Friday, May 2, 2025 at 1:49:08 am +02:00, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote: > On (25/04/23 21:53), Vitaly Wool wrote: > [..] > > > * zsmalloc/zstd/make -j32 bzImage > > real 8m0.594s > > user 39m37.783s > > sys 8m24.262s > > Zswap: 200600 kB <-- after build completion > > Zswapped: 854072 kB <-- after build completion > > zswpin 309774 > > zswpout 1538332 > > > > * zblock/zstd/make -j32 bzImage > > real 7m35.546s > > user 38m03.475s > > sys 7m47.407s > > Zswap: 250940 kB <-- after build completion > > Zswapped: 870660 kB <-- after build completion > > zswpin 248606 > > zswpout 1277319 > > > I'm sorry but what does this test test? That under memory pressure the > kernel swaps out different pages with different compression characteristics? > This test illustrates that zblock is faster than zsmalloc. No rocket science here. ~Vitaly