From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1D09C28B20 for ; Fri, 28 Mar 2025 20:08:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id F41D3280166; Fri, 28 Mar 2025 16:08:29 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id EF344280165; Fri, 28 Mar 2025 16:08:29 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id DBC81280166; Fri, 28 Mar 2025 16:08:29 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from relay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0010.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.10]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9CB6280165 for ; Fri, 28 Mar 2025 16:08:29 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin26.hostedemail.com (a10.router.float.18 [10.200.18.1]) by unirelay10.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96033C0728 for ; Fri, 28 Mar 2025 20:08:29 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 83272047138.26.C6D0A3B Received: from nyc.source.kernel.org (nyc.source.kernel.org [147.75.193.91]) by imf03.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 084702000B for ; Fri, 28 Mar 2025 20:08:27 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: imf03.hostedemail.com; dkim=none; spf=pass (imf03.hostedemail.com: domain of cmarinas@kernel.org designates 147.75.193.91 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=cmarinas@kernel.org; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed), No valid DKIM" header.from=arm.com (policy=none) ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hostedemail.com; s=arc-20220608; t=1743192508; h=from:from:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=ba6lvn8ltamF09a6lRx96RVxouF7iHdEIq/90uICs/8=; b=45onnrF2WrHPmhAKB/5AUOX/FasOTun06n8U17JMfjq5XOySj2HRK1BnlH6f+BCSU/YxQ9 98C43LuL4D6juJaBKQpfGbYgJm7/O0RtBz+dkU7zjWYFgvx2uNLT2QrmtumwjYlodGJHlX SJBm6Cw1uCIM5Q9PSym3xIieqWaFOU4= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; imf03.hostedemail.com; dkim=none; spf=pass (imf03.hostedemail.com: domain of cmarinas@kernel.org designates 147.75.193.91 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=cmarinas@kernel.org; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed), No valid DKIM" header.from=arm.com (policy=none) ARC-Seal: i=1; s=arc-20220608; d=hostedemail.com; t=1743192508; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=arGM/1DQQVhAOWn0NXuJc1566aYHEtrVe75QlFKDOJOBiCxz/czhOZx/EIMLWoTWkzVE6i wkasgRnki4s9+LxFzVDT7l8Ja0SquT/3aMl+7AEBSCOx8bW82g40p5gj6rQVoJRekVsYnr PspyN43Crma/vyrRG4mtdWCDuAspvns= Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by nyc.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75949A40CDC; Fri, 28 Mar 2025 20:02:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0BA77C4CEE4; Fri, 28 Mar 2025 20:08:23 +0000 (UTC) From: Catalin Marinas To: anshuman.khandual@arm.com, david@redhat.com, will@kernel.org, ryan.roberts@arm.com, mark.rutland@arm.com, ardb@kernel.org, yangyicong@hisilicon.com, joey.gouly@arm.com, quic_cgoldswo@quicinc.com, quic_sudaraja@quicinc.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, Zhenhua Huang Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, quic_tingweiz@quicinc.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: mm: Correct the update of max_pfn Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2025 20:08:21 +0000 Message-Id: <174319246799.4193737.10993641019327469518.b4-ty@arm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.5 In-Reply-To: <20250321070019.1271859-1-quic_zhenhuah@quicinc.com> References: <20250321070019.1271859-1-quic_zhenhuah@quicinc.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 084702000B X-Rspam-User: X-Rspamd-Server: rspam02 X-Stat-Signature: dmi9om7aiuyn81g4ts9heukm7ifdtuty X-HE-Tag: 1743192507-346005 X-HE-Meta: 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 xuQhd2uO 0Pd7YIclM+N6qCq1e6Wq3aRXclspn7wqWm1jsnY7gCWVqj0t2web3E6x3w00fib5RAOwxmOpLRxWti+GUezh+7XQ3kfv2/qmP4XdxTPAe9jKmSLyfDPlY5dl77U8cZM2I9NX6vH0SY+cawq5KDgxqskkFEivCSyYYIRWApZIX3fh1rHdp304ORv4oQgUsHI9TFBC41hqcuGZ6wdHYVixjknd6V81mZsORaOA6fLU9Mcp6a0asrdMgQnTNAvAwZNEqaY1Rg98ioZFB79Q4XgYO0GC9pwvz+VDupmGWE62a5vWPAPUTZCvnUb42wE+Y3//5Qm+kGrgV4glH2nb0MCp0n6aOV4illp0MEJYPEInzpYw7Qo/H1TTu2g241hpJa/1cEc1etNbMKYP8G39oEOBBRHP04Qadf8tIrmHiT+OrZwPwzCU= X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On Fri, 21 Mar 2025 15:00:19 +0800, Zhenhua Huang wrote: > Hotplugged memory can be smaller than the original memory. For example, > on my target: > > root@genericarmv8:~# cat /sys/kernel/debug/memblock/memory > 0: 0x0000000064005000..0x0000000064023fff 0 NOMAP > 1: 0x0000000064400000..0x00000000647fffff 0 NOMAP > 2: 0x0000000068000000..0x000000006fffffff 0 DRV_MNG > 3: 0x0000000088800000..0x0000000094ffefff 0 NONE > 4: 0x0000000094fff000..0x0000000094ffffff 0 NOMAP > max_pfn will affect read_page_owner. Therefore, it should first compare and > then select the larger value for max_pfn. > > [...] Applied to arm64 (for-next/core), thanks! [1/1] arm64: mm: Correct the update of max_pfn https://git.kernel.org/arm64/c/89f43e1ce6f6 -- Catalin