From: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
To: "Andrzej Hajda" <andrzej.hajda@intel.com>,
"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
"Christoph Hellwig" <hch@lst.de>,
"Jonathan Cavitt" <jonathan.cavitt@intel.com>,
"Linux MM" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"Maciej Patelczyk" <maciej.patelczyk@intel.com>,
"Mika Kuoppala" <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 14/26] drm/xe/eudebug: implement userptr_vma access
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2024 16:12:42 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <173444476233.58433.15197725556816943129@jlahtine-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <173392197322.40386.12252741494998606453@jlahtine-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com>
Quoting Joonas Lahtinen (2024-12-11 14:59:33)
> Quoting Christian König (2024-12-10 16:03:14)
<SNIP>
> > If you really want to expose an interface to userspace which walks the process
> > page table, installs an MMU notifier, kmaps the resulting page and then memcpy
> > to/from it then you absolutely *must* run that by guys like Christoph Hellwig,
> > Andrew and even Linus.
> > I'm pretty sure that those guys will note that a device driver should
> > absolutely not mess with such stuff.
<SNIP>
> > But that seems like a high-overhead thing to do due to the overhead of
> > setting up a transfer per data word and going over the PCI bus twice
> > compared to accessing the memory directly by CPU when it trivially can.
> >
> >
> > Understandable, but that will create another way of accessing process memory.
Based on this feedback and some further discussion, we now have an alternative
implementation for this interface via access_process_vm function posted by Mika:
https://lore.kernel.org/dri-devel/20241216141721.2051279-1-mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com/
It's a couple of dozen lines don't need to do any open-coded kmapping, only utilizing
the pre-existing memory access functions.
Hopefully that would address the above concerns?
Regards, Joonas
PS. It could still be optimized further to directly use the struct mm
from within the mm notifier, and go with access_remote_vm using that,
but would require new symbol export.
For demonstration it is implemented by grabbing the task_struct and using
the already exported access_process_vm function.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-12-17 14:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20241209133318.1806472-1-mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
[not found] ` <20241209133318.1806472-15-mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
2024-12-09 14:03 ` Christian König
2024-12-09 14:56 ` Joonas Lahtinen
2024-12-09 15:31 ` Simona Vetter
2024-12-09 15:42 ` Christian König
2024-12-09 15:45 ` Christian König
2024-12-10 9:33 ` Joonas Lahtinen
2024-12-10 10:00 ` Christian König
2024-12-10 11:57 ` Joonas Lahtinen
2024-12-10 14:03 ` Christian König
2024-12-11 12:59 ` Joonas Lahtinen
2024-12-17 14:12 ` Joonas Lahtinen [this message]
2024-12-20 12:47 ` Mika Kuoppala
2024-12-10 11:17 ` Simona Vetter
2024-12-12 8:49 ` Thomas Hellström
2024-12-12 10:12 ` Simona Vetter
2024-12-13 19:39 ` Matthew Brost
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=173444476233.58433.15197725556816943129@jlahtine-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com \
--to=joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=andrzej.hajda@intel.com \
--cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jonathan.cavitt@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=maciej.patelczyk@intel.com \
--cc=mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox