From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: Barry Song <21cnbao@gmail.com>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com, chrisl@kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mhocko@suse.com,
ryan.roberts@arm.com, shy828301@gmail.com, surenb@google.com,
v-songbaohua@oppo.com, willy@infradead.org, ying.huang@intel.com,
yosryahmed@google.com, yuzhao@google.com,
Shuai Yuan <yuanshuai@oppo.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] mm: remove folio_test_anon(folio)==false path in __folio_add_anon_rmap()
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2024 11:55:38 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <171f18ed-3fc7-47c8-8aef-d4ab31f55be0@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240617231137.80726-4-21cnbao@gmail.com>
On 18.06.24 01:11, Barry Song wrote:
> From: Barry Song <v-songbaohua@oppo.com>
>
> The folio_test_anon(folio)==false cases has been relocated to
> folio_add_new_anon_rmap(). Additionally, four other callers
> consistently pass anonymous folios.
>
> stack 1:
> remove_migration_pmd
> -> folio_add_anon_rmap_pmd
> -> __folio_add_anon_rmap
>
> stack 2:
> __split_huge_pmd_locked
> -> folio_add_anon_rmap_ptes
> -> __folio_add_anon_rmap
>
> stack 3:
> remove_migration_pmd
> -> folio_add_anon_rmap_pmd
> -> __folio_add_anon_rmap (RMAP_LEVEL_PMD)
>
> stack 4:
> try_to_merge_one_page
> -> replace_page
> -> folio_add_anon_rmap_pte
> -> __folio_add_anon_rmap
>
> __folio_add_anon_rmap() only needs to handle the cases
> folio_test_anon(folio)==true now.
> We can remove the !folio_test_anon(folio)) path within
> __folio_add_anon_rmap() now.
>
> Suggested-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Barry Song <v-songbaohua@oppo.com>
> Tested-by: Shuai Yuan <yuanshuai@oppo.com>
> ---
> mm/rmap.c | 17 +++--------------
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/rmap.c b/mm/rmap.c
> index 2b19bb92eda5..ddcdda752982 100644
> --- a/mm/rmap.c
> +++ b/mm/rmap.c
> @@ -1297,23 +1297,12 @@ static __always_inline void __folio_add_anon_rmap(struct folio *folio,
> {
> int i, nr, nr_pmdmapped = 0;
>
> + VM_WARN_ON_FOLIO(!folio_test_anon(folio), folio);
> +
> nr = __folio_add_rmap(folio, page, nr_pages, level, &nr_pmdmapped);
>
> - if (unlikely(!folio_test_anon(folio))) {
> - VM_WARN_ON_FOLIO(!folio_test_locked(folio), folio);
> - /*
> - * For a PTE-mapped large folio, we only know that the single
> - * PTE is exclusive. Further, __folio_set_anon() might not get
> - * folio->index right when not given the address of the head
> - * page.
> - */
> - VM_WARN_ON_FOLIO(folio_test_large(folio) &&
> - level != RMAP_LEVEL_PMD, folio);
> - __folio_set_anon(folio, vma, address,
> - !!(flags & RMAP_EXCLUSIVE));
> - } else if (likely(!folio_test_ksm(folio))) {
> + if (likely(!folio_test_ksm(folio)))
> __page_check_anon_rmap(folio, page, vma, address);
> - }
>
> __folio_mod_stat(folio, nr, nr_pmdmapped);
>
Lovely!
Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
--
Cheers,
David / dhildenb
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-18 9:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-17 23:11 [PATCH v2 0/3] mm: clarify folio_add_new_anon_rmap() and __folio_add_anon_rmap() Barry Song
2024-06-17 23:11 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] mm: extend rmap flags arguments for folio_add_new_anon_rmap Barry Song
2024-06-22 3:02 ` Barry Song
2024-06-17 23:11 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] mm: use folio_add_new_anon_rmap() if folio_test_anon(folio)==false Barry Song
2024-06-18 9:54 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-06-20 7:46 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-06-20 8:33 ` Barry Song
2024-06-20 8:49 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-06-20 9:59 ` Barry Song
2024-06-21 9:18 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-06-22 3:20 ` Barry Song
2024-06-24 23:25 ` Andrew Morton
2024-06-24 23:42 ` Barry Song
2024-06-17 23:11 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] mm: remove folio_test_anon(folio)==false path in __folio_add_anon_rmap() Barry Song
2024-06-18 9:55 ` David Hildenbrand [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=171f18ed-3fc7-47c8-8aef-d4ab31f55be0@redhat.com \
--to=david@redhat.com \
--cc=21cnbao@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=chrisl@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=shy828301@gmail.com \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=v-songbaohua@oppo.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
--cc=yosryahmed@google.com \
--cc=yuanshuai@oppo.com \
--cc=yuzhao@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox